The information available here in these two interviews confirms and supplements the state of things presented by both Kevin Mottus and Dr Paul Héroux on the air of Secure Freedom Radio that I have shared with you in this previous article. Among other things, safety and security concerns as well as health issues are looked at. A must listen.
Dans la première vidéo de Nomos-TV présentée ci-dessous, l’animateur Alexandre Cormier-Denis, en compagnie de son invité Richard Le Hir, commente la suspension des procédures dans le cadre du procès intenté contre Nathalie Normandeau et Marc-Yvan Côté, deux figures importantes du Parti Libéral du Québec. Ils font ici une excellente analyse de la situation. Personnellement, je dois dire que je ne suis pas du tout surpris que les procédures aient été suspendues. C’est plutôt logique en fait. Comme le dit si bien Richard Le Hir, «c’est la preuve que nous ne sommes plus en démocratie». Nous vivons sous un régime Libéral depuis 2003, mise à part la brève pause du gouvernement Marois. Il n’y a donc rien qui va se passer dans quelque dossier que ce soit impliquant des haut gradés du Parti Libéral tant que ce régime ne sera pas défait.
Mais j’aimerais élargir ici la lecture de la situation afin que nous puissions bien comprendre la nature du problème auquel on fait face. Voyez-vous, le problème…c’est aux États-Unis qu’il se trouve. Lorsqu’on parle des partis Libéraux du Canada et du Parti Démocrate américain, on parle en fait de la même élite politique. Ce sont des libéraux avec un ‘l’ minuscule. Malgré l’élection de Donald Trump, les patriotes américains attendent toujours que des accusations soient déposées contre Hillary Clinton dans plusieurs dossiers, dont notamment ceux des courriels classifiés et de la transation impliquant Uranium One. Le Procureur Général des États-Unis, Jeff Sessions, semble un peu lent à procéder et plusieurs se demandent qu’est-ce qui se passe au juste. Le Président Trump a commencé à faire le ménage dans son cabinet, un ménage qui n’est sans doute pas terminé. Songe-t-il à remplancer Jeff Sessions? Peut-être. Toujours est-il que l’on a pas besoin d’être un grand spécialiste en analyse politique pour comprendre que tant que le dossier de Hillary Clinton ne sera pas réglé aux États-Unis, il n’y a rien qui va se passer dans ceux des nos bons Libéraux de ce côté-ci de la frontière. Comme je le disais, il s’agit de la même élite politique. Tant qu’ils seront au pouvoir, ils continueront d’agir en toute impunité. Le President Trump doit agir afin de tourner la situation en notre faveur. La deuxième vidéo de Nomos-TV traite du parti de Québec Solidaire. J’ai pensé les publier ensemble, puisque ces deux partis politiques, le Parti Libéral du Québec et Québec Solidaire, ont en commun une chose essentielle: la détestation (sans le dire ni l’avouer publiquement) des Québécois de souche. Toutes leurs politiques et leurs programmes le démontrent amplement. Bonne écoute.
Following this episode of Norse News, I also join a promotional video from a new and very promising political party in Sweden called Alternative for Sweden.
This week’s shooting at Youtube was certainly a very tragic and sad event. Curiously, the media has not talked about it a lot, for reasons that are still unclear. Personally, to the contrary, I think that this very sad event presents us with a wonderful opportunity to reflect on the ways to take back control of the steering wheel of our numerous electronic platforms and devices.
So let me plunge right in by saying that Big Tech companies have gone way too far in the way they handle our personal information, in the way they are tracking us 24/7 and in the way they treat their «users». Since these companies are american ones, it is the responsibility of the U.S. government to make sure that they comply with the most basic values and principles of the United States. That is why I think that the time has come to give these Big Tech companies the status of public utilities, in the same category as the phone, the gas and the electricity. Electronic services have become so entrenched in our lives that now it is impossible for anyone to live and function without them. I know that President Trump is not keen on regulation. However, there are circumstances where regulation is the only solution. Social media and internet companies are absolutely incapable of minding their own stores. They don’t have the discipline, the clear-eye that is necessary to do that and most especially, until now, they had a de facto carte blanche to do whatever they wanted. This has got to stop. Presently, this is the far west in the world of electronics. Anything goes. Regulation seems to me like the only solution because, if we wait for these companies to come with some sort of arrangement, they never will.
The other thing is what I would call the burden of proof. Presently, the burden of proof is on the shoulders or the «users». Users have to behave in a way that is more and more in line with political correctness, diversity and the agenda of the Left in general. Companies like Facebook, Twitter, Google/Youtube, Apple can terminate your account or your monetization at any time arbitrarily for any reason and you can’t appeal their decision. They have the absolute power over you…because their services are free. Users don’t pay for the service so they are at the complete mercy of these companies and their will. In a normal business relationship, the burden of proof is on the shoulders of the service provider, the company, and it has to please its clientele, which are called not «users» but «customers». The words we use are important. If you are a customer a service provider will have no other choice but to respect your rights and give you satisfaction if the company wants to keep your monthly fee coming in every month. That’s why it is imperative that we start paying for the use of these platforms. It is only this way that we will ever be respected. If millions of people give, let’s say, 25 dollars a month each for their Facebook, Google, Twitter or Apple accounts, it is unlikely that these corporations would suspend or terminate any accounts because there is language used that is not politically correct or opinions that are not approved. They would simply keep going and let the police handle the very heavy cases. Also, the status of public utilities given to these companies would also protect customers against arbitrary decisions to cancel or suspend accounts. Of course, they could still terminate accounts for non-payment but in order to terminate accounts for other reasons, it is reasonable to envision that would be required by law to present their case before a judge in a court of law in order to protect the rights of the customers. And obviously, everything that I have said above also apply to smartphones, since they connect to the internet and record a great quantity of information on theirs users.
You must have heard many times the popular expression that says that «he who pays calls the shots». It was true ten thousand years and it is still true today. Since a couple of years, we have seen a number of conservative voices, bloggers and activists being censored, de-platformed, demonetized, etc. It would never have happened if they had been customers instead of just «users» and, on top of that, it would never have been possible in the first place if the companies had been required, by law, to abide by the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, as I have said above. How the protections granted by the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights could be extended to citizens living outside the U.S. will certainly be a very difficult and long legal challenge. Because, in the current situation, it is too easy for the totalitarian states of the world to use our Big Tech companies against us. We are defenseless since these corporations have adopted a business model that makes them perfect tools to attack and undermine our societies. Why should these Big Tech companies do dirty tricks on behalf of China, Russia, North Korea while they could defend and uphold our values and civilization instead? It is not the communists and the terrorists who are kicked out of social media. It is the conservatives and right-wingers. Don’t you see what is going on? I will leave you will a short video of Project Veritas, the fourth part of the Twitter series. It last only two minutes but it says it all.
To begin with, let me say that President Trump knows that he has signed a very bad document with the last 1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill. He should never have signed it and he knows that. He regretted it as soon as he did. He is probably frustrated, angry, disappointed and saddened by that. However, time is running out and we don’t have time to indulge ourselves into emotional reactions while there is so much to do to save western civilization. We have to keep going and continue to fight back. That’s why, on this Easter weekend, I would like to talk strategy a little bit. Everybody knows that the United States, Canada and Mexico are in a process a renegotiating NAFTA. In this article, I will leave aside Mexico since I don’t know much about their situation, besides the fact that it is letting millions of migrants going through their territory to reach the United States without stopping them, which speaks by itself on their mentality and behavior. So I will focus on Canada and the U.S.
Like everybody else you have seen the kind of dirt, lies, hatred and propaganda that was thrown at Trump during the Presidential campaign and since the beginning of his presidency. Question: According to you, how much of that was coming in fact from Canada, from the political elites and their allies in the media and other institutions? There is no way to know but anybody can make an educated guess. It is possible that it was actually coming from Canada, at least in part, with of course the participation of the Democrat Party and their activists. The Liberal Party controls the legislatures in the Province of Quebec and in Ottawa, the national capital, and others throughout the country. And the fact that they are in power in a province or at the federal level gives them the ability to use state powers to do things.
Elections are coming fast. Elections in Quebec are scheduled to take place on October 1st 2018. Elections at the federal level are scheduled to take place on October 21st 2019. My fear is that if Liberals in those two legislatures are respectively re-elected, they would then use state powers to undermine President Trump and maybe even try to unseat him. They may have done that already before. That’s why I think that it would be extremely unwise for President Trump to sign a new NAFTA deal before these crucial elections are held. Why? Precisely because then the Liberals of Philippe Couillard in Quebec and those of Justin Trudeau in Ottawa would use the signing of the deal as a marketing tool to sell their re-election bids to the public. On the contrary, without a new deal to show to the electorate, they would inevitably look incompetent on matters related to the economy, which would render their re-elections difficult. I am sure that with the Coalition Avenir Québec or the Parti Québécois in power in the legislature of Quebec, and with the Conservative Party of Canada in power in the legislature of Ottawa, the United States would find much better partners to conclude a trade deal that would be beneficial for both countries. But not only that. The collaboration with the United States in terms of security, border security, immigration would be greatly improved.
In a civilized world, countries don’t get involved in elections of other countries. But that doesn’t mean that you should let your political enemies get away and do nothing. Trump has a chance to make sure that his political enemies in Canada don’t get a second mandate to continue their misdeeds. And by doing so, he would then give a hand to Canadian patriots who are in desperate need of help. If nationalist parties are elected in both Quebec’s and Ottawa’s legislatures, all conditions would then be reunited to have a brand new NAFTA deal to celebrate, somewhere maybe at the end of 2019 or at the beginning of 2020. That would fall perfectly, by the way, for Trump’s launching of his re-election campaign for the Presidential Elections, don’t you think?