The President in great shape and at his best!
Like in many other western countries, Sweden has turned over to foreigners the task of defining who we are as people, cultures and societies. Henrik Palmgren presents us here the head of a governmental institution in Sweden, the Swedish National Heritage Board, a fellow by the name of Qaisar Mahmood, a man of pakistani origin. It is curious how our fellow nationals see the world. Everything that exists in Europe or the Americas has been built by people of European descent (before we used to say Indo-European). Roads, bridges, farms, lands for agriculture, schools, institutions, everything was done by us. To take the example of Canada, when the French and British colonists came (note here the use of the term ‘colonists’ and not ‘immigrants’) there was nothing. The land was an immense forest and they had to cut all the trees and build the roads to create a country out of these woods. When it was time to work hard, with a lot of sweat, immigrants and refugees were nowhere to see, with the exception of course of Africans who were brought by force. But now that our societies are fully developed, with plenty of resources, wealth, food, services, women and land, they all want to come here and teach us how to live, while plundering our resources. I am sorry but we have built these countries and we don’t have to take lessons from anyone from these so-called third-world countries. These dubious characters are trying to rewrite our history in an effort to replace our culture, religion and traditions by their own. One of the most comical attempt to rewrite western history is made by certain Arab or Muslim activists when they try to make the case that Vikings were Muslims! So, in supplement to Henrik Palmgren’s presentation of Qaisar Mahmood, I also join an earlier show of Red Ice TV where the theory of the Muslim Vikings was explored.
Recently the White House presented its Framework on Immigration Reform and Border Security. Basically, this framework is an attempt by President Trump to get the funding necessary to build a wall between Mexico and the U.S. In order to convince the Democrats into accepting to support the funding of the wall, President Trump has proposed to legalize 1.8 million illegal aliens who came or who can be brought under the program known as DACA. No need to say that this proposal has angered, disappointed, astonished, horrified a great number of conservatives, right-wingers, alt-righters, patriots and nationalists. This seems like a total 180 degree-turn from one of his major campaign promises, that is to end illegal immigration into the U.S. Certainly, to offer a path to citizenship to 1.8 million illegal aliens sends the wrong message. If that goes through and becomes a reality, it is one of these decisions that President Trump will undoubtedly regret for the rest of his Administration and probably for the rest of his life.
One thing needs to be understood here. Nothing will please the Democrats. They hate Trump. Nothing he will do, say, sing or dance will be beautiful or fancy enough for them. President Trump is wasting his time trying to get the Democrats on board with his project of building a wall. And it is not a question of numbers. Providing amnesty to 1.8 million, billion or trillion illegal aliens is not the issue. The issue is political. In this context, I think it is important to put things into perspective and to understand what is at stake here. A physical wall is needed between Mexico and the U.S. and providing a path to citizenship to people who came illegally into the country is irresponsible, unacceptable and foolish. So what can be done? It is pretty simple actually. There is a loophole here that would be interesting to investigate. We know that President Trump has promised to have Mexico pay for the wall. Then, if that happens, technically, it won’t be the U.S. paying for the wall but Mexico. And that’s where it becomes interesting. Briefly put, Congress and Senate have to vote on and approve spending bills that fund the different operations of the government. In other terms, before any of the tax-payers’ dollars is spent on anything, Congress and Senate have to authorize their spending and that is absolutely normal in any free country.
But the fact that Trump has said several times that it is Mexico that will pay for the wall changes things. In effect, if it is Mexico that pays for the wall, then the funding of the wall doesn’t really come from the U.S. but from Mexico… In turn, that implies that the President doesn’t need the approval of the House and Senate to have the wall built. He can give the order for the construction of the wall and when it is finished, send the bill to Mexico directly or raise a tariff at the border that would serve to cover the cost. This way, President Trump can abandon this very dangerous idea of providing citizenship to 1.8 million illegal alien, since he only suggested that to bring Democrats to support his wall project. By following this game plan, President Trump would be able to both have the wall built AND terminate DACA, which would be directly in line with his campaign promises and with the platform he ran on. I strongly encourage President Trump and the Administration to reconsider what they are about to do with the DACA recipients. I feel that a terrible mistake is about to be made but it is not too late. Sometimes, the way out of a difficult situation can be narrow, small and tough but it is worth trying it if you consider the payback that is awaiting. Let’s Make America Great Again one step at a time. The House Intelligence Committee memo has been finally published last week and the truth is coming out about the extend to which the Deep State has tried to undermine and destroy Trump. We will learn more as things evolve. But in the meantime, we have another very important milestone to reach. Now it is time for the construction of the wall and for the illegal aliens to get back where they came from, finally.
Excellente analyse d’Alexandre Cormier-Denis sur la récupération politique de ce triste événement faite par les politiciens locaux.