It is a very dark day for Great Britain. Tommy Robinson has just been released from prison, and that’s good news. The bad news is, as anyone can see in this interview given to Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, that Robinson has apparently suffered from some kind of psychological damage or trauma as a consequence of his imprisonment. Will that damage be permanent? Nobody knows but the British government bears responsibility. During the interview, Robinson recalls that he was placed in solitary confinement in a prison with a large representation of Muslims and that those Muslims used to throw feces through his open window, among other things. He was arrested on very disputable grounds, his rights were not respected, due process was not followed, etc. The whole thing seemed like a kangaroo court-type of procedure. The look of horror on Tucker Carlson’s face while Robinson tells his story is worth the trip because it says it all. What country on Earth, supposedly a democratic one, would treat one of its citizens like that, especially a patriot who, beside a few minor things, does nothing wrong and is beyond reproach? Great Britain apparently.
But why, would you ask yourself. Let me provide my own explanation. Robinson was arrested simply because he was protesting in front of a court building where a specific case that interested him was held. Authorities used the pretext that he was already in the vicinity of a court building to bring him in, if you know what I mean, before a judge. Again why? Probably because they wanted to punish him for doing the unthinkable: speaking his mind, courageously, in public. In effect, he was the one who read the famous speech at Speaker’s Corner that Martin Sellner, in the company of Brittany Pettibone and Lauren Southern, was supposed to give there. You see, it has been a long time since Great Britain is no longer a democracy. Remember that both George Orwell’ 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World see their action taking place in Great Britain. It is not an accident. Also, the famous cult TV series The Prisoner, starring Patrick McGoohan, was a british production. These three artistic productions were trying to portray reality as it is, not the fantasy world that the media would like us to believe. And by the way, Canada is a former british colony (they took over from the French in 1760) and curiously, I have seen before these kind of tactics. I can recognize the modus operandi. They are used regularly here against individuals with a strong mind a strong personality, so I am not surprised. Business as usual in the British Empire.
However here, contrary to the life of relative comfort and abundance that Patrick McGoohan’s character enjoyed in The Prisoner, Tommy Robinson was given a treatment reminiscent more of the ‘room 101′ treatment in George Orwell’ 1984. In that novel, room 101 was the room where the prisoners were interrogated and tortured to break their will and their mind. And I think this whole episode with Tommy Robinson has to be considered like that. The powers that be in Great Britain are trying to break him psychologically, and to a certain degree, they seem to have succeeded at least partially and temporarily, judging by the non-verbal signals and language given in this interview. We have to denounce that vigorously because if we don’t, tomorrow, it could be anyone of us going down the same road. Yes, it is a dark for Great Britain. The least the government could do would be to apologize to him and drop charges. Will they do it? Don’t hold your breath…
Recently, Lauren Southern, Brittany Pettibone and Martin Sellner were barred from entering the UK. While Lauren Southern was stopped in Calais, France, Pettibone and Sellner were arrested and detained in Britain where they were expecting to deliver a speech at the famous Speakers Corner in London. Tommy Robinson, the well-known British patriot and nationalist decided, in reaction, to deliver himself a few days later the speech that Sellner was supposed to give there. So, in order, the analysis of the whole incident by Mark Collett on Red Ice TV, followed by interviews made by Robinson with the political activists after their ordeal. Finally, you can watch a short video of the event. Apparently, the three activists are planning to sue the UK, so it will be interesting to see what follows from this.
Après la décision de Youtube de clôturer le compte de Boris Le Lay, ce dernier a décidé de changer de plateforme pour diffuser ses vidéos. Le site PewTube a la prétention de ne pas censurer les vidéos qu’elle publie en fonction de leur contenu politique. Espérons qu’ils ne feront pas marche arrière. Compte tenu du niveau de censure auquel les patriotes sont confrontés, c’est certainement une plateforme qu’ils peuvent utiliser pour diffuser leurs idées, tant que celle-ci restera libre et ouverte. Voici donc deux nouvelles vidéos de Boris Le Lay, publiées sur PewTube, où il explique et commente son exclusion de YouTube.
Dans cette conférence de presse, Marine Le Pen nous apprenait que certains comptes bancaires du Front National ont été fermés par les autorités de la Société Générale. De plus, elles nous apprenait également qu’au moins un de ses comptes personnels a été fermé par la HSBC. Ce qu’elle qualifie ici de «fatwa bancaire» est totalement inacceptable. Ce qui motive ces fermetures de compte est, évidemment, l’orientation politique. C’est carrément de la discrimination basée sur les idées politiques, alors que l’on réserve souvent la notion de discrimination seulement pour la race, le sexe ou la religion. Or, les services bancaires, comme le gaz, l’eau courante, l’électricité, le téléphone, et maintenant l’internet, est un service d’utilité publique. C’est un service essentiel sans lequel aucun citoyen ne peut fonctionner normalement. Priver un citoyen d’un de ses services est une atteinte directe à ses droits et à sa dignité. Ces décisions respectives de la Société Générale et de la HSBC mettent non seulement la démocratie en danger en France mais elles mettent en danger aussi directement les droits fondamentaux des citoyens. Si on peut priver un citoyen de son compte bancaire, en toute impunité, alors demain c’est le gaz, l’électricité, l’eau courante, le téléphone ou l’internet que l’on lui coupera sous prétexte qu’il ou elle n’a pas les bonnes idées politiques.
Franchement, je ne vois pas comment les Français peuvent accepter cela. En effet, un fait essentiel demeure. Dans le monde entier, et c’est universel, les organisations criminelles sont bien obligées de lessiver les profits de leur activités en utilisant le système bancaire. Elles ne peuvent tout de même pas garder des milliards de dollars sous le matelas, cela tombe sous le sens. Tout le monde le sait, les banquiers le savent aussi. Or, d’après ce que nous pouvons en juger, les banques ferment tout simplement les yeux ou regardent ailleurs lorsque cela se produit. En d’autres termes, si les banques ne refusent pas de donner accès à leurs systèmes à des individus ou à des organisations qui sont douteuses, pourquoi faudrait-il qu’elles le fassent pour des individus qui ont des activités légitimes? Après tout, l’activité politique fait partie intégrante de nos institutions. Avec ce genre de dérive, on pourra se retrouver bientôt dans une situation où des Français se retrouveront sans compte bancaire, sans électricité et sans eau courante alors que quelques portes plus loin des trafiquants en tous genres pourront profiter pleinement des largesses de notre société.
De toute évidence, on a affaire ici à la goutte qui fait déborder le vase. C’est assez. Les Français ne peuvent plus accepter de faire rire d’eux comme cela. Depuis quelques années, beaucoup de gens se sont levés pour dénoncer le démantèlement de la République française mais le problème c’est que, sur le terrain, rien ne se passe. Du côté des institutions, comme dans l’Armée par exemple, la plupart des généraux restent bien tranquilles et la vie continue. Pour ce qui est du système électoral, il est complètement pipé, puisque la proportionnelle n’a toujours pas été adoptée, d’une part, et d’autre part parce que la votation aux deux tours fait en sorte que tous les partis s’unissent contre le FN au deuxième tour. Il ne reste donc au Français qu’une seule option et c’est de prendre la rue pour faire entendre leur voix. Si la première Révolution Française a pu commencer parce qu’il n’y avait plus de pain, peut-être qu’une nouvelle Révolution pourrait commencer parce qu’on s’attaque à nos droits fondamentaux, comme celui d’avoir un compte bancaire. Les mêmes causes entraînent les mêmes effets. Si on peut se permettrent dans une société de fermer le compte bancaire de quelqu’un pour des raisons politiques, alors ce n’est pas plus compliqué de le dépouiller des tous ses biens et de l’envoyer dans une camp de concentration. C’est le sort qui attend les Français et tous les peuples d’Europe s’ils ne réagissent pas. L’Europe est sous occupation. Il serait grand temps, chers cousins, que vous le réalisiez, avant qu’il ne soit trop tard.
We are passing through extremely dark times. The recent solar eclipse is a mind-blowing expression of that. Decent and honest people are being attacked and destroyed while crooks and killers get away with almost anything. Why is that? It is difficult to give a definitive answer as this problem is multifaceted. The hacking of Red Ice TV website is a good example of what we are going through. The website is owned and run by a young couple, Henrik Palmgren and Lana Lokteff. They belong to a fringe movement of the political right, called the Alt-Right. You probably heard of that movement. Their website was taken down during the events of the Charlottesville rally called Unite the Right in which one person died and several people were injured after clashes between participants and protesters. I can say that although there are things that I would phrase differently, I do support the work that they do. They do an important service to the community by providing a platform to political dissidents and free thinkers in the United States and worldwide. Their resource is absolutely indispensable in these terrible times we are getting through. Yet their website was hacked, supposedly by the ‘antifa’, but it remains to be seen who did it. Here are some of my reflections on the subject.
First, anybody that took a look at their material could see that more than often they provide opportunities to people who are extremely critical of not only Muslims but also of Jews and⁄or Israel, and of non-white ethnic groups in particular. I believe that nobody is above critical thinking. If somebody has something to say about a certain group or a certain category of individuals, if it is sound and rational, we should celebrate that as a great contribution to society. But clearly, there are people who don’t think this way.
Second, and this is a crucial point, their website provide what we could call ‘free TV’. In effect, they often livestream political gatherings on their website, events that they participate in or that represent important milestones in the political sphere. As such, they may be seen as an unjust competition. There is absolutely no publicity on their website. Their activities are funded by their listeners and viewers through voluntary contributions. It goes without saying that big TV networks are probably frustrated and angry about Red Ice TV and other websites of the same type such as The Rebel, etc. Put yourself in the shoes of the big TV networks for a moment. They pump up millions and millions of dollars into their channels. But the more money they put in, the crappier the content gets. When I was a kid, there was only four channels on TV and for today’s standards, it was rather good. Now you have 500 channels and the content is terrible most of the time. Marshall McLuhan has written extensively on the nature of the media. ‘The medium in the message’, he was saying. Well, that’s the point. TV is like a bottle of sauce. The amount of sauce in it is finite. If you take that sauce and try to put into more bottles, it only dilutes the sauce more and more. At one point, there is no sauce anymore but water that’s what is happening with TV. Playing directly in this phenomenon is the obsession of specialization. When zapping, you can fall on a channel dedicated to the preparation of omelettes on July sunday mornings every Year of the Dragon. Well…I am joking but does it need to be that specialized? Probably not. As I have said, TV was much better when there was only a handful of channels and that was before specialization occurred.
So again, put yourself in the shoes of big TV network producers. You have a bunch of kids or young adults creating excellent TV, almost for free, and offering it for free to the world! Big TV is certainly not happy about that. The shows that independent media offer on the web are far better than the ones that you get from the ‘official’ TV. I am not saying that they are the ones who hacked Red Ice TV but let’s say that they wouldn’t mind, really. Independent media content creators make their own TV, film themselves with regular cameras and cellphones, and livestream or upload their shows on the web at a fraction of the cost…It is often said that big newspapers are losing readership, that it is falling year after year and that certain ones are on the path to bankruptcy. But it is also true for TV. It is very expensive to put on the air and the viewers are dropping it in favor of the internet that offers content that is interactive, new, bold and edgy. Personally, I don’t see any solution for big TV networks. They will continue to fall apart. TV, in its present form, is a medium that belongs to the past.
Another part of the problem is censorship and control. Just take a look at the number of hosts that have lost their jobs recently at Fox News for example. Fox News is good TV network, of right-wing orientation, that provides a platform for people that you don’t hear on the other networks. Guests come from the right-wing in general, they are Republicans, libertarians, conservatives, etc. But the content is made for a general public, not a smaller fringe like the Alt-Right or some other orientation. You have to be blind not to see that a certain ‘purge’ is going on at Fox that seems to follow the purge that is happening also at the same time in the Trump Administration. Those who were supporting Trump the most enthusiastically, such as Andrea Tantaros and Bill O’Reilly are no longer there. I am not getting into the specific reasons about why these hosts were fired or have resigned, I don’t work at Fox News so I don’t know what is going on there, all I am just saying is that a lot of them were supporting Trump and that is not a coincidence.
To come back at the hacking of Red Ice TV website, the hacking happened on the very day of the Unite the Right rally when they were en route to the event or just on arrival. I already talked about the rally itself so you can read my analysis in this previous article. We know that the State of Emergency was declared rather early as the event was starting. And that’s rather relevant here because in any standard State of Emergency law, or martial law, you may have provisions that allow the government to take control of communications. You don’t need a big IQ to figure out that somebody used the State of Emergency as a pretext to take down the site, or that somebody just waited for them to leave their apartment as the two hosts were departing for Charlottesville. I am joining two Youtube videos in which they themselves talk about the incident as they went through it and the possible leads of investigations that they have.
Why am I writing about that subject? Because although you may think that ‘it doesn’t concern me’ or ‘it is good for them if they did something wrong’ or ‘I am not getting involved’ or ‘it is not my concern’ you are next. If our elites can do that to a young couple, with a young baby, destroy their business and their livelihood and you don’t come to their defense, who is gonna take your defense when it is your turn? What happened to Red Ice TV and at the Charlottesville rally is unacceptable. What happened to the Jews during World War Two was a test-run. It is obvious that our globalist elites are preparing that same fate for all of us. Master crooks and thieves, of a caliber never seen, are at work. Regardless of the color of our skin, regardless of our religion, our values, our ethnic background, we will be subjected to the most brutal totalitarian regime that the Earth has ever known, unless we make a serious course correction. In effect, you have to understand that Hitler and Stalin didn’t have the technology that we have today. That technology gives the power to take total control. We have embraced technologies that allow our elites to know everything about every single individual anywhere on the planet. Our civilizational ship is a Titanic on a collision course and when the impact occurs, you are going to feel it, believe me. A few days ago, North Korea was able to launch a missile that flew over Japan and it was not taken down. But yet, we find the time and the energy to take down some websites and Youtube channels that express hate and racism…Don’t you think that our priorities are not the good ones? I will write a follow up on that article, focussing on tips and advice. For the moment, I will leave you with Henrik and Lana. Listen to what they have to say. Again, I repeat that the fact that you agree or disagree with them and their political ideas is not the issue. The issue is freedom of speech and our future as free men and women. If we don’t fight back against these very dangerous people who are trying to take control of the planet, our children and grandchildren will only have a life of misery and pain in slave labor camps. That’s what is looming on the horizon, folks.
Le cofondateur de l’organisation English Defence League et leader de PEGIDA, Tommy Robinson, ferait l’objet de harcèlement d’état en Grande-Bretagne, par le biais notamment de la police et du système judiciaire. Diana West commente ce cas qui est tout à fait orwellien. Malheureusement Robinson n’est pas le seul. Des milliers de patriotes font l’objet d’un harcèlement similaire en Occident depuis quelques années. Si cette forme d’intimidation existe depuis longtemps dans nos pays dits « démocratiques », il s’est fortement accru depuis que l’Administration Obama-Clinton est entré en fonction. Il faudrait être aveugle pour ne pas voir cela. Notons également que l’Angleterre est le théâtre des deux principaux romans d’ « anticipation » où la société totalitaire idéale est représentée: 1984 et Le meilleur des mondes. Cela ne peut être un hasard. Il est évident que les forces qui poussent au socialisme en Grande-Bretagne sont telles que l’on se demande si elle a une chance de demeurer une démocratie. L’élite socialiste britannique semble avoir un plan bien établi, préparé depuis longtemps et ces deux romans en témoignent largement. Retrouvez l’entrevue au troisième segment.