Réaction de Richard Le Hir sur la refonte du journal La Presse comme OSBL sur Nomos-TV

Excellente analyse de Richard Le Hir sur ce dossier. En effet, essayer de ré-emballer le journal La Presse comme un OSBL est ridicule. Tout le monde a compris que si cela devait voir le jour concrètement, cela voudrait dire que la famille Desmarais pourrait continuer à diriger la politique éditoriale du journal mais en faisant payer l’opération par les contribuables. Privatiser les profits et étatiser les pertes, c’est la nouvelle tendance dans nos bons pays démocratiques. Durant l’entrevue, Richard Le Hir en profite pour parler de l’affaire du cimentier LafargeHolcim, dans lequel la famille Desmarais a des investissements. Rappelons que cette compagnie est soupçonnée d’avoir versé des pots-de-vin au groupe armé État islamique pour protéger ses installations en Syrie. Pour appuyer le propos, je joins le journal télévisé de TV Libertés du 18 mai 2018, dont le premier segment traite également de ce sujet.

Why right-wingers should bypass social media…

Instead of losing your time on social media, why don’t you encourage websites that put out good information? That’s what we, in the political right, have to do to bypass censorship. The simplest way to do it would be to write commentaries directly on the websites themselves and not on the facebook or twitter page of these websites. That being said, unfortunately, some websites don’t have an independent comment section that allows you to do so. On some websites, it is possible to publish a commentary but only if you login on some social media first. Web hosts who do that are missing the point. If web users have to login on social media to comment an article of yours, they are not on your platform, they are on the one social media they use. That’s why it is imperative that right-wing web hosts create their own independent comment section on their website, if the one they use links with some social media. This way, comments written and published will stay there as long as you wish. They will not disappear at the will of some censorship czars. By creating networks of blogs and sites that link to each other and by writing commentaries directly on them, we will effectively be able to bypass social media. We have to stop depending on these multinational corporations to express ourselves. The day patriots, nationalists and dissidents understand that, things will start to change. We need to create our own tools and networks. Forget about Facebook and Twitter. The answer is at the tip of our fingers. Concerning video uploading now, PewTube seems to be a nice alternative to Youtube censorship, at least for the moment. We will see how things evolve in the future. Here are an article and a video from Red Ice TV where these issues of censorship on Twitter are discussed and analysed. The Weekend Warrior video features a section on twitter policies starting at 21:50.

Twitter Will Remove Users with Whom They Do Not Agree

The rally in Charlottesville: The ‘coup’ against the Alt-Right and Trump…

It pains me a great deal having to write this article but it is my duty as a responsible citizen to do so, so bear with me. Things are not going well with the Trump Administration. The policies put in place by President Trump are importantly different from those advertised by Candidate Trump and it doesn’t bode well for the future. What we saw in Charlottesville a few weeks ago when the supposed ‘white supremacist’ rally, called Unite The Right, happened was a real circus, a theater of smoke and mirrors to deceive the many. The media lied about it in a way for me that was unprecedented. I knew the media was lying but they surpassed anything I was expecting. Even Fox News, a supposedly right-wing network, lied up to their cheeks. The female host who was describing the events going on live was absolutely horrible, calling rallygoers racists and nazis. She was so completely over the top, unprofessional and dishonest that you were wondering if she was not making a pitch to be hired by some other network. I had to check the station identification logo to be sure.

To set the record straight, here is what happened at Charlottesville, from the facts and witnesses accounts that I could gather. Right-wingers of a variety of school of thought and political philosophy gathered in that town to protest the removal of Confederate monuments, the statue of Robert E. Lee among many. It was also an occasion to meet other right-wingers, to network and create bonds. A lawfull permit was given to the organizers and the police was informed of every detail. Everything was looking good. Rallygoers start to assemble in the morning and the atmosphere was peaceful. The police was monitoring and securing the event. Then the antifa showed up and increased their numbers rapidly. Some of them were armed with clubs and other weapons. Then for some reasons not explained the rally was declared unlawful, the State of Emergency was declared and things deteriorated rapidly. The police, at the request of local authorities clearly not in sync with the ideas and values of rallygoers, pushed Unite the Right participants toward the antifa thugs making them easy targets for injuries of all sorts. What is important to precise here, again according to people who were there such as Richard Spencer and others, is that the perimeter had been set in a way that made rallygoers trapped and had nowhere to go to escape the antifa. So violence broke out between the two groups. That’s a chance that right-wingers brought shields to defend themselves. Then, there was also the incident with the car but we don’t even know if it was intentional. We don’t know the circumstances.

The media portrayed the whole event as a nazi and KKK event while it was nothing of the sort. There might have been a few people with nazi flags but that doesn’t make all rallygoers nazis. Effectively, if your neighbour puts a Bolivian flag on his balcony that doesn’t make the whole neighbourhood Bolivian. You also have to remind yourself that sometimes people in the New Right or the Alt-Right for exemple use nazi paraphernelia as a means of provocation, not because they are real nazis. I agree with Richard Spencer when he says that the Charlottesville rally was a total set up. Everything was ready, the police, local authorities, the media, to be able to present the event as a nazi rally.

But then who was the target of such an extensive operation? Obviously the Alt-Right movement first, which is gaining momentum and in strength rapidly. I think that those who planned this ‘coup’ against the movement wanted to be able to tie in the stain of nazism to the Alt-Right to be able, in turn, to get to President Trump. You see, the media and the Left have been trying unsuccessfully for months to portray Trump as somebody who ‘collude with Russia’. They have been repeating this story over and over again but it doesn’t stick. It is obvious that they have decided to change tactics: If the Russia label doesn’t work maybe the nazi label will. That’s what it was all about. Members of the Alt-Right movement, largely represented at this rally in Charlottesville, were instrumental in providing support to Candidate Trump to assure his victory on November 8. They made the difference, so to speak. So they were targeted to be smeared as nazis in Charlottesville, by the Left and other nefarious forces, to be able to smear Trump himself in a second step as a nazi and discredit him.

Then you have Trump’s response to the events. To be perfectly honest, I am not sure that Trump gets it the way he should. Or maybe he gets it but his entourage don’t let him think besides what Washington expects. In the very dangerous world in which we live, the puck is going very fast. So, in order to survive and win, you have to think fast and act fast. In the aftermath of the rally in Charlottesville, Trump provided a response that was rubber-stamped by the swamp, so to speak. He talked about ‘bigotry, hatred, racism, etc. Then, a few days later, going off script, he provided a much better response when he denounced ‘violence on both sides’. But again that’s not what happened.

It is obvious that Charlottesville was a set up, a very clever, meticulous, articulate information warfare and propaganda operation designed to break Trump’s Presidency. All the signs are there showing that a soft ‘coup’ is under way to overthrow the President and marginalize his supporters. Within the Administration, those who support his agenda and policies are being pushed aside, fired or dismissed. The ousting of Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka are sending the signal that the Trump Presidency will not be about what Candidate Trump made campaign on. Also, those who support or used to support President Trump are being kicked out of social media, they see their videos on Youtube being demonetized, censored, they see their access cut from payments services, etc, in other terms they are being targeted for their political ideas. In that regard, everybody can notice that there seems to be more censorship going on since Trump took office than there was during Obama’s Presidency. Obama transfered the control of the internet to ICANN, the organism that delivers names and numbers for websites. Technically, while that is still a matter of interpretation by legal experts and lawyers, that transfert took off the protection offered by the First Amendment on speech, since now it is no longer the government that is in control of the internet but a non-profit organization.

President Trump could have easily denounced that transfer and proposed to cancel it, bringing it back under the government’s control. Why hasn’t he done that? President Trump said a few times that he would defend ‘religious liberty’. Well…there’s just one problem. Religious liberty and freedom of speech are not compatible. If you look at history, you will notice that very often religions were imposed on populations by force, sometimes by the sword. So religions spread throughout the world thanks to their ability to suppress the freedom of speech of those they wanted to convert. As far as I know, all religions of any importance did it. And today, we have to face the problem of Muslims trying to impose shariah law on non-Muslims. To let the Muslims deliver their propaganda in order for them to impose shariah on us is not ‘liberty’. It is folly and submission. When President Trump made his trip to Saudi Arabia to meet with the leaders of the Muslim and Arab nations, he was received and treated as a king. Personally, I am not sure I like it. Islam is a supremacist religion that tolerates nothing and no one outside its realm. When Muslims don’t like somebody, usually, that’s a good sign, a sign that that person is not submitting to shariah and is actually defending our values and freedoms. In that regard, you could say that Muslims are divided on Trump. Some of them like him, others don’t. Recently, Muslim activitst Linda Sarsour proposed the idea that resisting Trump was a form of jihad. Was the whole circus of Charlottesville part of that jihad?

I would like to finish with this broader question: How far are we willing to go in the West to accommodate the Muslim world before getting destroyed? I suggest that you listen to these two witnesses accounts, those of Richard Spencer and James Allsup.

Marine Le Pen présente son logo et son slogan de campagne présidentielle et l’analyse d’Aldo Sterone

Marine Le Pen, candidate à l’élection présidentielle française, présentait dernièrement son logo et son slogan de campagne, que vous pourrez voir dans la première vidéo qui suit. C’est tout à fait réussi, en plus d’être joli. Néanmoins, la victoire n’est pas gagnée d’avance. Le système électoral à deux tours rend la tache presque impossible aux partis qui ne font pas partie de l’oligarchie. En effet, les partis euro-altantistes ont tendance à se coaliser au deuxième tour pour barrer le passage aux partis non conventionnels. C’est de toute évidence la plus grande faiblesse du système politique français. Je vous présente également ensuite une vidéo du blogueur Aldo Sterone où il fait l’analyse des chances de Marine Le Pen à l’élection de 2017. Je suis d’accord avec lui lorsqu’il dit qu’elle perd son temps à essayer de plaire aux médias français. Les médias français n’aiment pas Marine Le Pen « pour ce qu’elle est, pour ce qu’elle représente » et ne vont jamais l’aimer. Les médias français travaillent pour défendre les intérêts de l’oligarchie, pas pour défendre ceux du peuple. Lorsqu’ils l’invitent en studio, ce n’est jamais pour bien la faire paraître, c’est plutôt l’inverse. C’est pourquoi, il faudrait que la candidate à la présidentielle adopte une stratégie « à la Donald Trump » en s’adressant directement aux électeurs, via des meetings publics ou des conférences en direct sur internet. C’est la meilleure façon de rejoindre ceux qui pourraient voter pour elle. Les grands médias appartiennent au système ploutocratique qui a pris le pouvoir en douce après la Seconde Guerre Mondiale. Comme ils font partie du problème, les patriotes devront apprendre à créer et à développer leurs propres canaux de communication pour prendre le pouvoir malgré et en dépit des grands médias, en les contournant.

Conférence du National Policy Institute de 2016

Cette conférence intitulée « Become Who We Are » a été organisée par le National Policy Institute et a réuni plusieurs des plus éminents penseurs du mouvement politique Alt-Right. Le mouvement Alt-Right prône notamment l’arrêt de toute immigration, la fin de la mondialisation et développe une pensée politique où la race, l’identité et la nation tiennent une place importante. Il combat le multiculturalisme, le progressisme et l’influence de culture non-européennes comme les cultures juive et musulmane. Kevin McDonald, Jared Taylor et Richard Spencer y ont participé, pour ne nommer que quelques-uns. Elle a eu lieu le samedi 19 novembre et a été diffusée sur internet par le média alt-right Red Ice TV. Une conférence de presse y a été tenue, que l’on peut voir vers le milieu de la première partie. Notamment, la question de la liberté d’expression a été abordée lors de la conférence, puisque plusieurs porte-paroles du mouvement Alt-Right ont fait l’objet récemment de censure de la part de Twitter. Pour ma part, je ferais remarquer aux membres de ce mouvement que c’est une perte de temps d’utiliser ces plateformes dites des « médias sociaux ». En effet, elles sont contrôlées essentiellement par les mêmes forces qui contrôlent déjà la télévision, les journaux et la radio. Les patriotes et nationalistes de tous pays, qu’ils se disent Alt-Right ou non, doivent créer leurs propres médias et leurs propres plateformes au lieu de perdre leur temps sur Twitter et Facebook. En gros, je dirais que cette conférence a été très relevée et qu’elle incarne l’avenir. Le mouvement Alt-Right est à l’avant-garde de la pensée politique. Nous avons la chance de voir l’histoire s’écrire sous nos yeux. Profitons-en!