Julian Von Abele took the opportunity to defend white and western civilization on a college campus when he was confronted by a crowd of angry leftists. The scene was recorded and posted on Twitter. He stood up for himself, for the white race and for our civilization and we owe him a debt of gratitude. In this interview with Alex Jones, he explains the context of the event and shares his thoughts about it. Thank you, man. You have been terrific. Two thumbs up!
In this episode of Week-End Warrior, Lana and Henrik of Red Ice TV discuss the latest film form Dinesh D’Souza, Death of a Nation. To make things brief, D’Souza tries to sell us the idea that the Democrats were the real Nazis and fascists and that the Democrat Party was the party of slavery, etc. Although this thesis has certain merits, I agree with Lana and Henrik that Dinesh D’Souza twists reality in order to propagandize against the Democrat Party and that is wrong. There were partisans of slavery and of nazism in both parties. But I want to cover another aspect of D’Souza’s view of things that they don’t talk about (not directly). It is the question of White supremacy. Dinesh D’Souza covered the subject of White supremacy in an interview given to Frank Gaffney on the air of Secure Freedom Radio (the audio files are below). During the interview, he explains to Gaffney that fascism and Nazism were left-wing ideologies and that is an argument that can be made if we look at their doctrine. He says that the Left put the blame on the Right for the crimes of Nazism and fascism and that is true. Right-wingers don’t commit mass murder and try to reduce the rights of the citizens. But he fails to see that, in that regard, the so-called White supremacy is a concept that was invented by the same Left to try to portray patriots in a bad light. During the interview, he makes references to figures of the Alt-Right like Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer and says that they are wrong, etc, etc. People in the patriotic and/or nationalist movement are not ‘White supremacists’. They are activists or advocates for the white race. That means that they want the best conditions for the white race, to thrive, to be prosperous, to grow, etc, and there is nothing ‘supremacist’ about that. And that is done not at the expense of others. Every race and ethnic group has the right to be free and live in an environment favorable to its development. Dinesh D’Souza falls into the trap of calling ‘supremacist’ good men and women who simply want to protect us from harm and avoid the catastrophe of totalitarianism. Dinesh D’Souza is trying to have it both ways. He wants the public to believe that those who call right-wingers ‘fascists’ and ‘nazis’ are wrong when they do that, but on the other hand, that they are right when they call certain right-wingers ‘white supremacists’. According to Dinesh D’Souza those so-called ‘White supremacists’ are not really right-wingers. The truth is that they are really right-wingers but they are not White supremacists. They are trying to protect us.
To visit the page of the show on SFR: Interview with Dinesh D’Souza on Death of a Nation
Lana Lokteff responds to accusations that white people would like to mass murder non-whites, while it is the opposite that is true. The current trend shows an increasing danger for the lives and well-being of whites. The case of South Africa, where white farmers are being killed regularly, is certainly the most extreme. But we can see the threat growing in the western world as well as non-whites become increasingly aggressive and impolite toward whites, on top of predatory moves made on their property, their wealth and resources.
In this video, Lana asks her viewers why is that interracial relationships are pushed on white women. Effectively, everywhere in the media we constantly see couples made of a black guy and of a white woman. That translates into the real world as well. Look around you and you will notice these couples everywhere you go. So why is that this type of relationship is pushed on white women? Lana Lokteff gives a lot of good reasons here, like the intention to erase the white race by mixing it with other races. But the main reason she doesn’t mention (not in plain terms) is that this type of relationship is designed to signify to the white man that he has been conquered by the black man. Following the conquest of a territory, men of the victorious tribe always take the women of the conquered ones. It is a constant in history. So, if black males appropriate white females for themselves, leaving white males to be alone or to watch porn, that can only mean that they have, or at least that they consider that they have, conquered our western territory, home of the white men. You see, that type of relationship has nothing to do with love or desire. It is engineered to make the white man feel subdued and conquered by depreciating him before his peers, before the women of his tribe and before himself. Again, unfortunately, that is another thing that we can add to the legacy of Barack Obama. No one in the history of the United States has done more to divide people among themselves.
With the first link, please listen to Ronnie Crouse in the second segment on the Secure Freedom Radio show. Then, in order, please listen as well to Simon Roche on Red Ice Radio and Clare on Radio 3Fourteen with the second and third links. To finish, here is also a small documentary showing how white people are being gradually replaced, often with violence, in western countries.