The Special Counsel Investigation: A witch-hunt that is turning into a witchcraft…

This article is rather difficult to write. I will struggle with many things at the same time so bear with me. We are going through some very troubled times and things are often very complicated to sort out correctly. Let’s begin. The Special Counsel Investigation into Russian interference has become a real witch-hunt against President Trump, anybody can see that. The investigation is leaded by Robert Mueller who was the head of the FBI when 9/11 happened. What does it have to do with the investigation on Trump, you might ask? Probably a lot. I find it particularly curious that the officer in charge of that witch-hunt against Trump was in that job when the attacks on the World Trade Center occurred on September 11th 2001. After all, among all the responsibilities that the FBI has remains the duty to protect the homeland from terrorist attacks. The Bureau didn’t prove very good on that day and neither the other agencies by the way. How that a bunch of mercenaries from Afghanistan were capable of pulling out something like 9/11 without being detected long before the attacks and wrapped up is completely beyond logic.

During the Presidential campaign, Trump made allusions to 9/11 as something that could have been preventable and he also showed signs, if you read between the lines, that he would like the light being shed on 9/11. Americans and citizens of the world have the right to know the truth about the attacks on the World Trade Center. The official version of 9/11 makes certainly a very nice plot for a movie but that is not what happened in the real world. The facts that are presented to us about 9/11 are misleading and don’t present a picture of events that is credible. No need to say that if such light should be shed on 9/11 one day, Robert Mueller would be among the first people to lose and to lose a lot.

Also, again during the Presidential campaign, Trump promised to ‘drain the swamp’. The Washington swamp is certainly very resilient and they have a lot of power and will to protect their interests, which are very often not compatible with those of the American people. When you observe the kind of shenanigans and gambits that the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation are involved in and the people who are associated with these enterprises, you realize that the elites of this country don’t give a damn about what happens to the little people. The technical term for that is ‘nepotism’. Nepotism happens in a country when the political elites give the jobs, the privileges and so forth to their friends and relatives and not to the people who are either qualified or based on merit. And here, please don’t worry: that nepotism seems to be contagious in the West. It is present in a lot of countries, not just in the U.S.

One of my greatest disappointment with the Trump Presidency is the performance of Attorney General Jeff Sessions. He recused himself in the investigation on Russia interference in U.S. elections. It was a terrible decision of very grave consequences. That paved the way for Rod Rosenstein to take charge of the investigation and nominate Robert Mueller to lead it. That investigation, as we know, as turned into a witch-hunt against President Trump. It now has nothing to do anymore with Russia. It’s all about Trump.

That brings me to talk about the swamp again but a little more precisely this time. I know exactly what is going on with that investigation because what Trump is going through is greatly similar with what I had to endure since I created this blog back in 2010. And I am not the only one here. Thousands of people like me throughout the world had to go through a similar experience. You see, democracy is gone. Now throughout the West, you have these nepotist regimes, disguised as democracies, that use everything they can find to enrich their officials and clients. And one of the most powerful tool they can use is, of course, the judicial system. So they weaponize the police, the courts, the investigation processes and so forth in order to put pressure on the people who are deemed not to be part of their circle of friends, relatives or clients. Concretely, that means that they can put anybody of their political opponents under investigation and, reversely, put off the hook anybody who belongs to their clique.

For President Trump, who promised to drain the swamp and who doesn’t belong with the people who let us down on 9/11, it is clear that it implies this: the swamp has decided that he is guilty and they will investigate him until they find something. That is the modus operandi of the swamp. It is fair to assume, throughout the West, that the local swamp of a country has a black list of individuals to be framed as criminals or/and terrorists. Obviously, if an individual is put under surveillance 24/7, recorded, filmed, tracked, etc, something may come out at some point. It could go as far as planting false evidence to incriminate somebody. When you know what somebody is doing and where he/she is 24/7, it is not complicated to do. But that is not constitutional. The job of the police and the judicial system is to investigate crime and punish crime, not to fabricate crime. The whole purpose, the real purpose in the real world, of the Special Counsel Investigation is to transform President Trump into a criminal. I can say that with a lot of confidence since, as I said earlier, I have been subjected to that same kind of procedure. As a blogger, a political activist and a political dissident, I am not part of the canadian nepotist swamp, to say the least, and every day is a fight to stay alive.

For Trump, it is very easy to predict how it is going to end. After months of being smeared and framed as a criminal, he will be impeached. So President Trump now must act quickly. Two options present themselves here. The first option involves Jeff Sessions. He could terminate Mueller’s investigation with or without firing Rod Rosenstein and Robert Mueller. That would allow him to save his job and the President. Option number two involves Trump. The inaction of Jeff Sessions will force the President to fire Sessions and probably Rosenstein and Mueller to make a clean slate and have a new start. Time is running out. The White House must make a decision. With so much important work to be done on security and on the economy, the Special Counsel Investigation has become a distraction and a drain on resources that must end now. I am wondering what the White House would think about Rudy Giuliani as Attorney General. Let’s see.

Learn more about Operation Golden Lily with Dave Emory on For the Record

FTR #451 Petals from the Golden Lily

Learn more about Operation Diamondback with Sander Hicks and Allan Duncan on For The Record

Excerpt from the broadcast:

At the meet­ing, Abbas made a chill­ing dis­clo­sure: that the World Trade Cen­ter tow­ers were “com­ing down.” “The tony Tribeca Grill, owned by Robert DeNiro, was just north of the World Trade Cen­ter in 1999. Abbas boasted to his din­ner com­pan­ions that he wouldn’t have any prob­lem tak­ing out the entire down­town restau­rant. ‘Because it’s full of Amer­i­cans.’ Towards the end of the meal, he ges­tured out towards the Twin Tow­ers. ‘Those tow­ers are com­ing down.’[Empha­sis added.]” (Ibid.; p. 2.)

Conversation with Sander Hicks and Allan Duncan

Documentary Islam Vs Islamists, featuring Tarek Fatah and Zuhdi Jasser

The investigation of Rita Katz on Operation Green Quest

This radio show by Dave Emory explores the heroic investigation of private citizen Rita Katz on Operation Green Quest that led to the Holy Land Foundation trial. Her work allowed us to unveil the deep penetration of the GOP and of the Bush Administration by islamist elements from the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Al-Qaeda. However, her research was eventually subverted and neutralized by members of the CIA and FBI. Among several things, Dave Emory explores the role eventually played by the Ptech firm, owned and controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, on the day of 9/11. In effect, the fact that it is Ptech that developped the threat assessment software used by the Air Force, the FAA and Norad could account for the confusion experienced on the morning of 9/11, which facilitated the attacks and delivered New York and Washington D.C. to hostile forces. Also, the role played by the Safa Trust and the SAAR network on the economic side of it is also explored, among other elements. Rita Katz has written a book titled Terrorist Hunter in which she chronicles the whole story.

FTR #569: The triumph of treason

Dave Emory: Fifth Column, Part III, the Subversion of Operation Green Quest

FTR #462 Fifth Column Part III: The Subversion of Operation Green Quest

Debunking the fifth column, part 1: Controlled-demolishing the Truthers

Since 9/11, anti-fascist researcher and radio host Dave Emory has made considerable efforts to convince people not to join the « Truthers ». For those who don’t know, the Truthers are these political activists who try to convince America and the world that 9/11 was an « inside job » and that explosives or missiles were used to bring down the WTC. Of course, everything Truthers present is just an amount of B.S. Real science and just pure good common sense prove it rather quickly. However, there are still people drawn to these bogus explanations. And for reason. Their media representatives are good, talented and they manage to convince at least a part of the crowd. After studying them for several years, I came to the conclusion that the Truthers were in fact the media apparatus of a fifth column in waiting in the U.S. to overthrow the goverment. Their job is to cover the tracks of the real perpetrators of 9/11. Their rhetoric is overtly fascist, if you take the time to listen. FTR #599 show that follows is one the best presentation made to debunk the fallacious claims of the Truthers. Emory accessed various documents and studies produced by indus­try pro­fes­sion­als expert in the field of con­trolled demo­li­tion (italics mine: L.d.). These must not be mistaken for the so-called « Engineers for Truth » about 9/11, who are as bogus as their claims. Brent Blanchard of Protec Documentation Services company has produced a document that is controlled-demolishing piece by piece the assertions of the Truthers.

In a nushell, what I want you to realize is that this line of rhetoric is the product of a fifth column ready to and trying to seize power. Don’t listen to their sirens. Because once you kiss them, you will realize that they are sharks in fact, and it could be too late. I have added another blog post by Dave Emory dealing with this topic and a second website you can visit, besides all the above mentioned, hoping that it will convince you to flush this so-called « truth » about 9/11.

FTR #599: Update on September 11 and Related Matters

No, No Nano-Thermite

Brent Blanchard’s document

Progress Report on the Analysis Red/Gray Chips in WTC Dust

Debunking 911

Interview with Robert Parry on For The Record: The Bushes and the bin Ladens helped each other

This great interview with Robert Parry of the Consortiumnews website by anti-fascist researcher Dave Emory must be listened to. For lots of reasons but especially because we never get to hear the full story in the mainstream media, as well as in the so-called « alternative » media, on anything. It is always one side of the coin only, if ever one side is covered correctly without ideological biases, preconceptions, prejudices, etc. The received rhetorical line concerning 9/11 and its aftermath goes like this: « The evil Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda warriors have attacked America. George W. Bush, as a true Commander-in-Chief, has stood up against these bloodthirsty terrorists and he is making sure that America stays safe and secure. He has struck back at them by going to war in Afghanistan and in Iraq ». That’s the way it goes.

Well…like it is often the case in life, it is not that simple. To begin with, let me remind you of a couple of things. First, in 2001, the Bushes and the bin Ladens were on the board of directors of the Carlyle Group, which Dave Emory has studied and presented in For The Record # 347. The Carlyle Group is one of the most influential investment firms of the world. Only the greatest of all get the chance to sit on that precious panel. And on the day of September 11th 2001, they just happened to hold their annual investment conference. Probably only just a coincidence, one could say. Members could then watch live the events unfolding in Manhattan. Among others, Frank Carlucci and James Baker III were present. Second, let me remind you as well that on September 12th, when nobody else could fly in the U.S., 12 members of the bin Laden family were flown out of the country. Third, both the chief of intelligence for Saudi Arabia and the head of the FBI were replaced in the weeks just prior to 9/11, which is rather curious and frightening, to say the least.

All things considered, the « war on terror » has been good for both the Bushes and the bin Ladens. For George W. Bush, this war has allowed him to be in the spotlight and be admired as the great defender of America, to acquire additional powers for his presidency and finally to shout out all those who were contesting (rightfully) the validity of his election at the detriment of Al Gore. And for the bin Ladens, the war on terror allowed Osama to strengthen the cause of Al Qaeda and recruit new warriors. In 2004, only four days before the presidential election, Osama bin Laden released a video in which he denounced George W. Bush. Intelligence analysts at the CIA were of the opinion that Osama bin Laden was in fact trying to help George W. getting reelected. In effect, such a virulent attack against Bush by Osama before the election was obviously recuperated by the Republican team as an endorsement of John Kerry. That was enough to swing the vote in favor of George W. And why would Osama do such a thing, would you ask? Because Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda didn’t want the U.S. out of Iraq, U.S. troops being too good for the cause of Al Qaeda.

Mr Parry talks about a lot of other different relevant points. One of them is the obvious biased coverage by the press of the performance of Democrat politicians. Robert Parry explains that a game of professional credibility assessment was at play in the media, as Conservative politicians were quite often accusing journalists of being « liberal ». Reporters reacted to these accusations by becoming harder and tougher on Democrats, unfairly most of the times, to establish their credibility, with the unfortunate consequence that Al Gore was treated miserably. Parry gives many examples. This is a great show. In order to listen to the audio archive, you must have Realaudio installed.

Interview with Robert Parry on For The Record #575