Entrevue avec Trevor Loudon sur les liens entre l’Union Soviétique et l’islam

Cette excellente entrevue avec l’activiste politique et blogueur Trevor Loudon brosse le tableau des liens étroits existant entre les fondamentalistes islamistes et les mouvements, partis, régimes et pays communistes et/ou socialistes. Il a présenté les fruits de sa recherche dans un livre intitulé The Enemies Within: Communists. Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress. La thèse du livre, en gros, est que l’Union Soviétique n’a cessé depuis la fin de Deuxième Guerre Mondiale d’infiltrer l’Occident, en particulier les États-Unis, afin de se livrer à du sabotage de l’intérieur. Depuis la chute du Mur de Berlin, la Russie continuerait de se livrer à cette infiltration et ce sabotage par l’emploi des fondamentalistes islamistes. Durant cette entrevue d’une heure avec Frank Gaffney, l’auteur donne plusieurs exemples pour étayer son propos, notamment l’activité de groupes comme ACLU, le Council for a Livable World, celle d’oligarques comme George Soros et de politiciens comme Barack Obama. Le travail de Loudon complète bien les travaux de Diana West sur l’infiltration communiste des États-Unis, qu’elle a merveilleusement bien campé dans son livre American Betrayal: The Secret Assault on Our Nation’s Character. Ces deux livres donnent l’autre côté de la médaille expliquant l’effondrement de l’Occident. Dernièrement, je vous ai présenté une série d’entrevue avec l’auteur Peter Levenda sur le monde underground nazi de l’après-guerre dans son livre intitulé The Hitler Legacy. Un autre ouvrage du même genre de John Loftus intitulé The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed The Jewish People, présente l’histoire de l’industrie pétrolière et de ses liens avec le renseignement. Il nous amène à comprendre comment ces éléments ont façonné la résolution des conflits et des guerres et pourquoi les idéologies nazie et islamiste ont pu continuer à prospérer malgré la monstruosité de leurs actions.

Ceci m’amène à une réflexion plus générale. Je vous avoue que cela me fatigue depuis longtemps mais on dirait que le moment est venu de faire le point. Comme vous le savez sans doute si vous suivez ce blogue depuis un certain temps, ce site est dédié au combat contre les idéologies totalitaires, quelles qu’elles soient. Or, je remarque que bien peu de mes contemporains sont capables de suivre mes pas. Les activistes antinazis ou antifascistes sont rarement anticommunistes et vice versa. Les gens choisissent un camp ou l’autre sans comprendre qu’il s’agit des deux côtés d’une même médaille. Pour donner l’exemple des États-Unis, pour les Républicains tout est de la faute des Démocrates, et pour les Démocrates, tout est de la faute des Républicains. Si on passe en revue la planète, on voit aussitôt que les protagonistes d’un conflit se blâment l’un l’autre continuellement. Arabes et Juifs, Ukrainiens et Russes, Iraniens et Saoudiens, Chiites et Sunnites, orthodoxes et catholiques, catholiques et protestants, Irlandais et Britanniques, Canadiens-Français et Canadiens-Anglais, etc, etc… C’est toujours la faute de l’autre. Cependant, l’histoire montre toujours qu’il n’y a ni bons ni méchants mais des circonstances qui font en sort que certains peuples ou certains pays prennent des décisions afin de protéger leurs intérêts ou leur survie. Les protagonistes d’un conflit ont à la fois tort et raison, en ce sens qu’ils défendent leurs intérêts et donc, à ce niveau, ils ont tous des choses à se reprocher.

Je suis estomaqué par le fait que beaucoup de mes contemporains ne peuvent pas voir les deux côtés des choses. Pour donner un exemple concret, mes deux émissions de radio préférées, For The Record animée par Dave Emory et Secure Freedom Radio animée par Frank Gaffney, reçoivent régulièrement des excellents invités. Or, les invités de l’une des deux émissions ne sont jamais invités sur l’autre, ce qui fait que le débat d’analyse politique et de renseignement se fait en vase clos, même si le résultat est très bon. Ainsi, en ce qui concerne les excellents livres que j’ai cité précédemment, il faut donc les lire en parallèle. Comme les auteurs ont vraisemblablement des réticences à tenir compte de l’autre côté de la médaille, c’est le lecteur lui-même qui doit le faire. On en est rendu là. Je vous invite donc à livre The Hitler Legacy, The Secret War Against the Jews, American Betrayal et The Enemies Within en parallèle en « remplissant les espaces libres » qui auront été laissés par leurs auteurs. Ce n’est qu’ainsi que nous pourrons reprendre en main notre compréhension de l’histoire. Je vous offre également certains articles précédents où vous pourrez retrouver des entrevues avec les autres auteurs mentionnés.

Trevor Loudon sur Secure Freedom Radio

Entrevues #5, #6 et #7 avec Peter Levenda sur l’héritage hitlérien et le djihad mondial

Entrevue #4 avec Peter Levenda sur l’héritage hitlérien et le djihad mondial

From Communism to Islamism: The Secret Invasion of American Society

Diana West: Des agents soviétiques ont subverti les États-Unis dans les années trente

John Loftus parle de son dernier livre, America’s Nazi Secret

FTR #731 Interview with John Loftus about “America’s Nazi Secret”

La campagne de boycott antisioniste sur la rue St-Denis à Montréal: Une inquisition anti-Québécois et une opération nazie/fasciste

Introduction

Le présent article est le résultat de plusieurs mois de luttes contre le groupe PAJU qui harcèle certains commerçants de la rue St-Denis à Montréal depuis octobre 2010. Je vais donc essayer ici de rassembler les pièces du dossier comme le ferait n’importe enquêteur de police ou d’un autre service. Et je dois dire d’emblée que cet article se révèle à la fois être un résumé, un répertoire, un bottin, le premier d’une série de plusieurs articles ou même l’introduction d’un livre, tant la quantité des liens et des connections est importante à connaître. Tout au long de ces interminables mois durant lesquels je me suis rendu manifester contre le groupe PAJU pour essayer de contrecarrer leurs efforts envers les boutiques Le Marcheur et Naot, et ce parce qu’ils auraient commis l’odieux crime de vendre des souliers fabriqués en Israël selon les dires du PAJU, j’ai toujours eu l’impression que nous n’avions pas les bonnes clés d’interprétation pour comprendre le conflit et, ce faisant, ne nous pouvions alors adopter la bonne stratégie pour gagner la bataille. J’avais l’impression que ce qui se passait dépassait largement les cadres de l’antisémitisme et des dérives de la gauche. Comme pour vaincre une maladie il faut d’abord faire le bon diagnostic, l’honnêteté par rapport aux faits est essentielle. Cette campagne a toutes les allures d’une opération de renseignement de très haut niveau. J’adore les opérations de renseignement, les analyser, les décortiquer…sauf quand elles font paraître mon peuple comme une bande d’idiots ou d’antisémites, ce qui est le cas présentement. J’ai donc décidé de retourner aux sources afin d’avoir une meilleure vue d’ensemble, dans le but de tuer dans l’oeuf ce qui m’apparaît comme une véritable voie de fait contre le peuple québécois. Ce n’est qu’en leur remettant le nez dedans, eux les ingénieurs de cette opération, qu’on pourra la désamorcer. 

J’en profite pour clarifier que je ne reprendrai pas l’argumentaire présenté par Pierre K. Malouf dans son merveilleux livre Les faces cachées d’Amir Khadir (Éditions Accent Grave, 2012, 280 pages). Ce serait inutile. Dans une formule tout à fait appropriée, Malouf a affirmé que Françoise David et Amir Khadir représentait « la vitrine présentable de Québec Solidaire ». En ce qui me concerne, partant de là, je vais plutôt m’attarder sur ce qui se trouve à l’intérieur de la boutique de l’extrême-gauche québécoise, pour ne pas dire dans l’arrière-boutique et peut-être même dans la ruelle, si c’est possible. Je m’intéresse aux conditions sociales, politiques, historiques, idéologiques et financières qui ont rendu possible cette campagne de boycott sur la rue St-Denis pour commencer. Aussi, je veux mentionner que je ne prétends pas que tous les liens présentés ici sont nécessairement fondés et pertinents à notre investigation. Tout enquêteur sérieux et compétent est parfois amené à s’intéresser à de fausses pistes et à de fausses connexions, sans le vouloir. Que voulez-vous, ça fait parti du métier et toutes les hypothèses doivent être regardées systématiquement pour en venir à isoler la plus plausible. Néanmoins, les découvertes que j’ai faites lors de cette enquête sont suffisamment troublantes pour mériter que je vous les présente dans cet article. Mais pour permettre à ceux qui ne seraient pas familiers avec la manifestation du PAJU sur la rue St-Denis d’en connaître les grandes lignes, voici une entrevue de Pierre K. Malouf accordée à l’émission En Direct De Nulle Part.

Lire la suite

Reflections on Memorial Day featuring Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin and Dave Emory

Here is a great interview with Lt. General Jerry Boykin on Secure Freedom Radio, followed by a blog post by Dave Emory. I thought that both a conservative and a progressive point of view were needed in order to grasp the difficulty we are facing. While Jerry Boykin focuses on the need to continue the fight against regimes that threaten freedom, Dave Emory recalls us that the war against Nazism is not over. In effect, it appears that Germany, stealthily and slowly, is in the process of winning the war against the Anglo-American empire.

Lt General Jerry Boykin on Secure Freedom Radio

Memorial Day Post: The Past Isn’t Dead and Buried, It Isn’t even Past

The Muslim Brotherhood in America documentary, Part 3

This is part 3 of a documentary produced by the Center For Security Policy and presented by Frank Gaffney. I also join two radio shows and blog posts by anti-fascist researcher Dave Emory for supplemental and different information, one of them being an interview with previous Justice Department attorney John Loftus. Loftus wrote many great books, such as The Secret War Against the Jews and America’s Nazi Secret, among others. In this interview, he discusses the Muslim Brotherhood as exemplifying what came to be called islamofascism.

FTR #455 Compendium on the Muslim Brotherhood

FTR #564 Interview with John Loftus

Interview with Diana West on Secure Freedom Radio: Bogus « democratic » revolutions, civilization jihad and the subversion of western societies

When the so-called Arab Spring took place last year, very few people actually showed any form of moderation in their analysis of the situation. Heated by the French Revolution-type atmosphere of the events, they displayed emotions ranging from euphoria, joy, happiness, etc, but very little in terms of careful examination of history and in terms of reflexion. A few media personalities and political analysts recommended caution on the contrary, and we have to acknowledge today that they were right. Dave Emory, a radio host and antifascist researcher for more than thirty years, was one of them. In a series of shows starting in FTR #733 through #739, he presented a whole collection of elements and connections that bring anyone studying this event to seriously put into question the official version of things. In effect, a careful examination of the so-called revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya show that there is virtually zero chance that any democracy could come to the light of day in these countries. Why? For a lots of reason, among them history, the type of Islam preached and imposed there, and the absence of significant civilian society structures. In all fairness, we have to recognize that his analysis was correct. You can access these shows below.

Last week, we learned that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood will in the end present a candidate, Khayrat el-Shater, for the Presidential Election, after stating earlier that they would not. On Secure Freedom Radio hosted by Frank Gaffney, Diana West, a member of Team B II and of the Center for Security Policy which produced the marvelous report Shariah: The Threat to America, offered this week a testimony on how the Muslim Brotherhood was not only taking control of societies in the Middle East but was successfully infiltrating and coercing the United States. Parenthetically, we could add that they are doing the same thing virtually in every other western societies. To exemplify this, she brings the example of how the U.S. military is slowly being accustomed and acclimated to Sharia, in order to make it more compliant with all the requirements of Islam, to a point of humiliation. In effect, troops in Afghanistan are asked not to do anything that could « offend » Muslims, at the expense of soldiers’ security, and to turn a blind eye to pedophilia. In other terms, soldiers are expected to show « respect », i.e. obedience and submission to Sharia Law, and the result is an immense feeling of demoralization. (By the way, demoralization is the first step in the process of subversion of a society. For more on this topic, check this earlier post in which Yuri Bezmenov, a defector from the KGB, presents the complete process of subversion.) Lire la suite

Debunking the fifth column, part 1: Controlled-demolishing the Truthers

Since 9/11, anti-fascist researcher and radio host Dave Emory has made considerable efforts to convince people not to join the « Truthers ». For those who don’t know, the Truthers are these political activists who try to convince America and the world that 9/11 was an « inside job » and that explosives or missiles were used to bring down the WTC. Of course, everything Truthers present is just an amount of B.S. Real science and just pure good common sense prove it rather quickly. However, there are still people drawn to these bogus explanations. And for reason. Their media representatives are good, talented and they manage to convince at least a part of the crowd. After studying them for several years, I came to the conclusion that the Truthers were in fact the media apparatus of a fifth column in waiting in the U.S. to overthrow the goverment. Their job is to cover the tracks of the real perpetrators of 9/11. Their rhetoric is overtly fascist, if you take the time to listen. FTR #599 show that follows is one the best presentation made to debunk the fallacious claims of the Truthers. Emory accessed various documents and studies produced by indus­try pro­fes­sion­als expert in the field of con­trolled demo­li­tion (italics mine: L.d.). These must not be mistaken for the so-called « Engineers for Truth » about 9/11, who are as bogus as their claims. Brent Blanchard of Protec Documentation Services company has produced a document that is controlled-demolishing piece by piece the assertions of the Truthers.

In a nushell, what I want you to realize is that this line of rhetoric is the product of a fifth column ready to and trying to seize power. Don’t listen to their sirens. Because once you kiss them, you will realize that they are sharks in fact, and it could be too late. I have added another blog post by Dave Emory dealing with this topic and a second website you can visit, besides all the above mentioned, hoping that it will convince you to flush this so-called « truth » about 9/11.

FTR #599: Update on September 11 and Related Matters

No, No Nano-Thermite

Brent Blanchard’s document

Progress Report on the Analysis Red/Gray Chips in WTC Dust

Debunking 911

Why should we need white slavers when we have Louis Farrakhan?

Louis Farrakhan, the neighbour of Barack Obama and leader of the Nation of Islam, continues to be what he is…an islamo-facist. Last week-end, he spoke before 600 students somewhere in the United States. During the speech, he said to students, and among them black students, « not to be friends with Jews because they are behind black slavery ». This may be not the exact quote but it is the essence of what he said. In fact, what Farrakhan does is covering the tracks of the very people who do engage in black slavery in Africa, i.e. continental Muslims. He simply protects his fellow Muslim brothers. Typical modus operandi of totalitarians of all stripes. Here I propose an interview with Charles Jacobs on Secure Freedom Radio, hosted by Frank Gaffney of the Center For Security Policy, and one radio show and an update blog post by Dave Emory on this charming fellow, Louis Farrakhan. I also join two PDF documents that will allow you to have a better grasp of the « humanitarian » dimension of his political activism.

Charles Jacobs on Secure Freedom Radio

FTR #21 Louis Farrakhan and the Politics of Murder

A Meeting of the Minds: “Truther” Richard Gage and Louis Farrakhan

Louis Farrakhan: Tormenting the Heart of Africa

Genocide and The Slavery in The Sudan

Ayers and Dohrn, Barack Obama, the death of Andrew Breitbart and the rise of Third Position fascism

(06-08-2012) N.B.: Before I let you read the article, here are a couple of points that I posted on SpitfireList.com on May 20th 2012 as a response to some criticism about the article from the website host. These remarks should serve as caveat, precisions, to be able to put into context the core of the text. I admit that this article was a reckless attempt, not necessarily successful, to explain and put into context something rather difficult to conceptualize. In the end, I think Obama is a good man but he is surrended by people who are not and who are trying to seize the occasion to do harm. Here it is:

Thanks for these remarks. I will clar­ify a few points just to be sure we agree on my posi­tions con­cern­ing Obama and the rest. Maybe the writ­ing of my arti­cle could be improved to reflect that.

First, I have never said that OBAMA killed Bre­it­bart or that he wanted to kill him. He nev­er­the­less signed, if I am not mis­taken, an Exec­u­tive Order that legal­izes tar­get­ted assas­si­na­tions of Amer­i­can cit­i­zens. Some­body else could have done it. Maybe.

Sec­ond, I have never said that Obama was third posi­tion. It is rather the crowd sur­round­ing him and with whom he evolved that gives me that impres­sion. For me, the Chicago milieu is bad and breeds rad­i­cals. But the right is not any bet­ter, of course.

Third, I agree, the Weath­er­men were prob­a­bly agent provocateurs.

Fourth, con­cern­ing Israel, reli­gious Zion­ism is prob­a­bly wrong as you say, but we must not for­get that Israelis face anni­hi­la­tion not only since 1922 (that’s 1917 in fact- Ed), year of the Bal­four Dec­la­ra­tion, but since the begin­nings of Chris­tian­ity. John Loftus’s The Secret War Against the Jews remains, for me, the best tool to under­stand the sit­u­a­tion. When the fate of the Jews is secured, the state of Israel is secured, we will have plenty of time to crit­i­cize Zion­ism and Netanyahu or any other politi­cian in place. I don’t like Netanyahu court­ing right-wingers, but there is not much of a choice. Obama is not favor­able toward Israel and the U.S. has only two parties…

Fifth, yes, Obama is very dif­fer­ent from Bush. Ide­aly, if we could com­bine the best of the two in just one can­di­date, that would be great. But unfor­tu­nately, it doesn’t work like that it seems.

I kept it brief and I hope it clar­i­fies things.

———————————-

The recent death of Andrew Breitbart has opened a Pandora’s box. The controversy has raged over the fact that he was very vocal during the whole month of February about releasing, on March 1st, some tapes that would irremediably hurt Barack Obama and seriously undermine his chances to get re-elected. Apparently, the videos show Barack Obama during his college days with radicals. The fact that he died only hours before having the occasion to do so, has led many in political circles to ask themselves whether or not Breitbart could have been eliminated. The sudden heart attack that brought him down is seen by certain people as possibly only the official version of the story. Well, we may never know what really happened. However, this event has opened a rift, so to speak, in the political analysis spectrum, and now certain connections from the past emerge on the surface. A first tape has been released on March 7th. It shows Barack Obama during his college days at Harvard University endorsing and hugging Derrick Bell, a controversial professor who expressed radical leftist ideas about race. The hugging part of the video was censored at the time of the Presidential Election to avoid doing any damage to Obama’s campaign.

A thread is common and I want to present it to you. Kevin Coogan, a marvelous author, has written a book titled Dreamer of the Day: Fran­cis Parker Yockey and the Post­war Fas­cist Inter­na­tional. This book presents the political philosophy of Francis Parker Yockey, a post-war fascist political thinker. In a nutshell, Yockey wanted to breed a new kind of fascism where nazism/fascism, communism and Islam would merge, along with elements characteristic of Third World sensibilities, to create a new form of fascism that didn’t exist before WWII. Uniting the Far-Left and the Far-Right, with the Iran of the Ayatollahs and the Nation of Islam, was a priority and a goal in itself for him. Lire la suite

A Fireside Chat: Get to know more Dave Emory as he explains the concept of the « Underground Reich »

This show by anti-fascist researcher and radio personality Dave Emory is definitely « different » from the other shows. In this broadcast, we get to know more of Dave Emory as he explains a key concept of his political analyses, that of the « Underground Reich ». As a starting point, Emory presents a glimpse into the political  and military strategy of Sun-Tzu, a Chinese general, as he wrote in his manuel, The Art of War. Incidently, these few passages were excerpted in The Service: The Memoirs of General Reinhard Gehlen. Reinhard Gehlen, for those who don’t know, was Hitler’s intelligence chief for the Eastern Front before he was hired by the CIA at the end of the war. Through the Cold War, Gehlen continued to spy on the Soviets but then on for the benefit of the CIA. As Emory explains more in details what he means by the « Underground Reich », he tries to make us reflect on the possibility that such tactics as described by Sun-Tzu could very well be applied here in the western world, and on the means that we could use to fight back against them. Finally, through psychological, spiritual and metaphysical analyses, Emory invites us to reflect on the higher meaning of life and on what it means to resist and fight back against tyranny. This show is absolutely fabulous. This is a must-listen!

A Fireside Chat

FBI Whistleblower Coleen Rowley, Patriot Act Victim Susan Lindauer and radio personality Dave Emory on NDAA 2012

The U.S. Senate and House have just approved a very dangerous bill that could mark the end of democracy itself in America. Here are the reflections of a few significant personalities who have very interesting things to say about it and its implications for our lives, the future of western society and for the principle of democracy to begin with. First, let’s hear Coleen Rowley and Susan Lindauer on the Peter B. Collins radio show. Next, a recent blog entry by radio host personality Dave Emory presents a similar analysis: It could reveal to be the end of democracy itself in the U.S.

Peter B. Collins Show

Bye Bye Democracy…