Dearborn U.S.A.: A fine example of Barack Obama’s « change »

When I watched this video, I couldn’t believe my eyes. It got me angered for the rest of the day. It’s a chance to come to America. North America is a land of peace and prosperity. No foreigner or recent immigrant has the right to despise or criticize the U.S. or Canada, precisely because we offer the very conditions and advantages that exist nowhere else in the world. In this footage, we see Middle Eastern new « Americans », if we can use that term, throwing bottles, cans, pieces of concrete, rocks, at a group of Christians peacefully demonstrating… Yes, you read correctly. No need to reach for your glasses to make sure you got it right. These so-called new « Americans », just getting of the boat, their feet still being soaked, are displaying the rudest, most impolite, unrespectful, obnoxious and violent behavior toward the very citizens who  are welcoming them here in the first place and who, by the way, are also paying for their social benefits through taxation. This totally crosses the line. I’m fed up with Middle Eastern immigrants. Is there something they respect?

The other totally unacceptable thing in that incident is the attitude of the local police. Looking at their performance and listening to what they say, you almost have the impression that it is the Christians who are the newcomers in a Middle East country. The police clearly has a biais against the white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant or Catholic, Christians who peacefully demonstrate their faith during what is, from what we can see, an Arab festival of some kind. How much of this « change » will we have to endure before somebody gets the clock back to our values and traditions? You don’t need a Ph.D. in sociology to see that these Arab/Muslim immigrants are not here to integrate into the larger population. They are here to conquer us by slowly imposing their culture, religion and customs, and they do it by coercing the authorities, political, civilian and police force. I feel the need to throw up. Our leaders have let us down to please voters. And we can also bet that big cash from the oil sheiks certainly helped them to « understand » the importante of « tolerance » and « comprehension » in these matters. Christians and westerners have become estranged in their own land. Shame on our leaders.

The Cold War’s Arab Spring: The Russians did it

This brilliant article by Claire Berlinski presents new facts on how the Middle East was wrecked beyond redemption. In effect, according to Kremlin records stolen by Russian exile Pavel Stroilov, the Soviets are responsible for it, in a large part. The article depicts a quite different picture from what we are used to imagine, i.e. that it is the oil industry and its unquenchable thirst for drilling and pumping that destroyed the whole Middle East and the life of its populations. The article points out to Mikhail Gorvachev as one of the main perpetrator and facilitator of this scheme. Also, it puts into context the main design of Russian geo-political and geo-strategical experts: the control of the Middle East jewel, the Persian Gulf. Once it appeared impossible, detrimental or risking to start a world war to actually succeed in doing that, Israel became the next target. The role of the KGB is explored at length. Excellent article, two thumbs up!

The Cold War’s Arab Spring

Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich on Secure Freedom Radio: We need to reform our foreign policy on the Middle East

© Aleksan | Dreamstime.com

I can’t agree more. I wish Gingrich could become the Republican nominee to beat Barack Obama. Featuring Cully Stimpson, Newt Gingrich, Thomas Scheber, and Bill Gertz.

Newt Gingrich on Secure Freedom Radio

Interview with Diana West on Secure Freedom Radio: Bogus « democratic » revolutions, civilization jihad and the subversion of western societies

When the so-called Arab Spring took place last year, very few people actually showed any form of moderation in their analysis of the situation. Heated by the French Revolution-type atmosphere of the events, they displayed emotions ranging from euphoria, joy, happiness, etc, but very little in terms of careful examination of history and in terms of reflexion. A few media personalities and political analysts recommended caution on the contrary, and we have to acknowledge today that they were right. Dave Emory, a radio host and antifascist researcher for more than thirty years, was one of them. In a series of shows starting in FTR #733 through #739, he presented a whole collection of elements and connections that bring anyone studying this event to seriously put into question the official version of things. In effect, a careful examination of the so-called revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya show that there is virtually zero chance that any democracy could come to the light of day in these countries. Why? For a lots of reason, among them history, the type of Islam preached and imposed there, and the absence of significant civilian society structures. In all fairness, we have to recognize that his analysis was correct. You can access these shows below.

Last week, we learned that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood will in the end present a candidate, Khayrat el-Shater, for the Presidential Election, after stating earlier that they would not. On Secure Freedom Radio hosted by Frank Gaffney, Diana West, a member of Team B II and of the Center for Security Policy which produced the marvelous report Shariah: The Threat to America, offered this week a testimony on how the Muslim Brotherhood was not only taking control of societies in the Middle East but was successfully infiltrating and coercing the United States. Parenthetically, we could add that they are doing the same thing virtually in every other western societies. To exemplify this, she brings the example of how the U.S. military is slowly being accustomed and acclimated to Sharia, in order to make it more compliant with all the requirements of Islam, to a point of humiliation. In effect, troops in Afghanistan are asked not to do anything that could « offend » Muslims, at the expense of soldiers’ security, and to turn a blind eye to pedophilia. In other terms, soldiers are expected to show « respect », i.e. obedience and submission to Sharia Law, and the result is an immense feeling of demoralization. (By the way, demoralization is the first step in the process of subversion of a society. For more on this topic, check this earlier post in which Yuri Bezmenov, a defector from the KGB, presents the complete process of subversion.) Continuer la lecture

Kevin Freeman on economic and financial terrorism: The Chinese threat and Unrestricted Warfare

© Boroda | Dreamstime.com

This episode from the Frank Gaffney Show on Secure Freedom Radio deals with a more tenuous aspect of terrorism than the one we are used to deal with. In effect, terrorism and warfare undertaken through means of economic and financial manipulations are not easily recognizable and diagnosable by us, the laymen, in normal circumstances. If such shenanigans can have as terrible consequences as 9/11 produced, they can never be as spectacular and so they remain most of the time unnoticed. The 2008 financial collapse produced a loss of wealth estimated at 13 trillion dollars for the U.S. and 53 trillions for the whole world. Frank Gaffney’s January 17th guest, Kevin Freeman, brought to our attention something that unfortunately passed under the radar of a vast number of western observers. In effect, two colonels of the People’s Liberation Army of China, Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui, have written in 1999 a book on military strategy titled Unrestricted Warfare. That manuel seems to have inspired a few of the machinations that we have seen unfolding since the ’90s, including possibly even 9/11 itself. In a nutshell, the book describes how a weaker military power can wage war against a powerful country like the United States through unconventional means, such as lawfare, economic warfare, network (computer) warfare, terrorism, etc, in a way to progressively weaken it and have it crumble from the inside.

Kevin Freeman unfolds the analysis of this case using the example of what he calls « Bear Raids », i.e. the aggressive and hostile financial and market manipulations that were used and that led to the crash of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. George Soros is widely known to have used these kind of tricks against institutions perceived as weak links to become the rich man he is today, and he certainly didn’t miss the opportunity to do so prior to and during the 2008 crisis. He is even mentioned by name in the document itself of Unrestricted Warfare, at least once on page 135 of the English version. Anonymous people betted against these firms, in other terms they betted on their collapse. Freeman mentions a bet of some 1,7 million dollars. Who would take such a bet without having concrete evidence that the market will effectively collapse? Signs were indicating that these bets were coming from the Middle East and London. Kevin Freeman then alludes to more specific tricks used by financial predators and sharks, like short selling and naked short selling. Without puting into question the competence of Kevin Freeman on these matters, I think Lucy Komisar has done a better job of explaining the mechanics of these two particular gambits, so as a complement I would refer you to this previous post where you will be able to get a lot of detailed information about short selling and naked short selling. I recommend that you listen to the one-hour interview that she gave to radio host Dave Emory in For The Record #650. Freeman also touches on some complementary elements to try to sum up the question of financial terrorism in relation with Unrestricted Warfare. That show is a not-to-miss to understand a little better the world in which we live.

Kevin Freeman with Frank Gaffney