Interview airs in segment #3.
He is absolutely right. Think about it folks before giving your consent or approval to laws, principals, rules, accommodations, arrangements, etc, that go against the laws and constitutions of our countries and that are often in direct contradiction with the values of western civilization. Stand up for democracy while you still can. Here is Frank Gaffney on The Frank Gaffney Show.
Listen to this marvelous video on free speech in Europe, published in 2010. I know that I am a little late but better late than ever. Pat Condell is extremely effective in summing up the situation of freedom of expression in the old continent. First, you have biased judges who act with contempt toward anyone who tries to defend the European culture against deliberate attacks coming from Islamists and pro-Sharia fanatics. Members of Parliament are frequently held to court and treated as if they were high-level criminals, such as in the case of Geert Wilders. Phony trials are organized all over the place to satisfy the bigotry of Islamists and/or of their submissive and coward European-born lap dogs. And for what purpose? To silence dissent. It is the most insidious form of censorship. And evidently, journalists are playing this game as well, buying the propaganda and showing no form of critical thinking.
As Condell points out, the Left is the new Far-Right. A group that greatly exemplifies this is the UAF, United Against Fascism. They are united against fascism, yeah, but they are no democrats either. In fact, they behave like a bunch of thugs, disrupting peaceful protests, often vandalizing property, etc. Europe is infested with activists of this kind, ready to sabotage every single aspects of democracy, in the name of democracy itself, this is the irony of it. Laws are protecting those who wants to destroy Europe. We can see it in the way courts behave, in the way journalists report the news, in the way activist groups are taking position on issues and acting on them. It is almost as if freedom of speech only exists for one side of the board: those who want to destroy Europe. As incredible as it may sound, that’s the reality. There is a diagnosis of the EU presented by Nigel Farage that you don’t wanna miss either, here.
Yes, dear readers. Ghadafi MUST continue fighting the Islamo-fascists that are trying to take over the country. It is a question of life and death for western civilization! We are assisting now at an attempt to recreate the Ottoman Empire, through a Caliphate that would begin at the Detroit of Gibraltar to end at the confines of China. An immense land-mass, the Earth Island as it is called, containing the biggest concentration of natural resources, of oil, of land, etc, where unadulterated Islamic beliefs and practises, Sharia, would be the law of the land. An Empire where pure corporate capitalism would have the time of its life, free to conquer, submit, destroy and exterminate at will! Really, you have to continue the fight, Ghadafi. You might be our last hope to avoid such a nightmare. If Libya stays strong, firm, defiant, it might be enough to sabotage this attempt by the forces of darkness to corrupt the world more than it already is and to bring it to total destruction. Keep fighting back! Stay strong! The future of the whole world is on your shoulders! Check these articles where Ghadafi is seen arriving in a hotel in Tripoli, his fists high in the air in sign of combat and defiance. Really, that expresses beautifully the spirit of resistance!
Here are three videos in which Frank Gaffney, founder and president of the Center For Security Policy, tries to fight back against Islamists in America and elsewhere. The most interesting thing here happens in the third video and it is the attitude and behavior of CNN Anderson Cooper. What is the problem with this guy? In the interview, he literally gives a free pass to Suhail Khan. If you want to know who Khan really is, check the earlier post about him on this site. It is incredible to see how in the interview Cooper tries to demolish and demonize Frank Gaffney’s argument. Cooper doesn’t even bother to look at the argument and facts and to ask Khan at least to comment on them. It must be, in his whole career, the easiest interview Khan has ever given. He was not interviewed as a matter of fact. He just stood by while Cooper was playing either the fool, the ignorant, the bigot, the leftist or something else. In the end, it is either this: Cooper is in with the Islamists or he doesn’t understand at all how the world really works. Personally I don’t know. I will let you decide.
I would like very much that the Egyptian revolution be genuine. It probably is, in the sense that people who gather in central Cairo are young Egyptians desperate to have a job, some money in their pockets and some food in their stomach. They demand for democratic changes to be able to better their situation and have a life, finally. That’s great. My apprehensions remain on the aftermath of all this. The Muslim Brotherhood hasn’t dissolved into thin air since the beginning of this popular uprising. They kept themselves at a distance, more or less into passivity. Will they accept that a democratic government take control of Egypt if President Moubarak leaves now? Well, that remains to be seen. As far as I’m concerned, they haven’t abandonned the Jihadist and pro-Sharia agenda that they used to have so far. The way I see the Muslim Brotherhood, they are the equivalent of the CIA for the Muslim World. They infiltrate, analyse, study their opponents and with a strategy to defeat them. Is it possible that they are simply waiting in the dark, willingly using these democratic protesters to do the dirty job of ousting the dictator for them, in order to seize power after he has left the country? I think it is a distinct possibility.
Dave Emory in his last For the Record show FTR#734 refered to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in the early years of the twentieth century. Effectively, a more moderate group, the Mensheviks leaded by Martov, was trying to bring about a revolution as well. Both groups, Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, were competing to do it and at first, the Mensheviks were the ones who succeeded to implement the first stages of the process. But in the end, the Bolsheviks, the more radicalized group of these two, violent and anti-liberal, probably better trained in propaganda and tactics, recuperated the movement and chased the Mensheviks from power. Many of them went into exile after this. The spectre of a new manifestation of this sociological drama is waving in the distance in the so-called Egyptian revolution. The Egyptian democrats, the equivalent of the Mensheviks in this case, those who believe in democracy and in the liberal system, might end up doing the dirty job for the Muslim Brotherhood, the equivalent of the Bolsheviks.
Some observers have made the case that foreign influence might be at work in both Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings. While German and Sweden nationals have been arrested recently in Tunisia with weapons, which is definitely curious and dubious, the Moubarak government itself is putting the blame for the uprising on western influence. Western journalists are even harassed and beaten sometimes by the angry mobs. So I think that, in order to have a real understanding of the situation, we have to reach out again and use the marvelous science of geo-politics. It comes down to this: what are the signs with which we can appreciate the context of the uprisings in terms of western foreign policy in the cases of Tunisia and Egypt? Here are three basic facts to take under consideration:
- Tunisia and Egypt already are non-Islamic states;
- Tunisia and Egypt are ‘friends’ with the western world and Israel;
- Egypt has signed a peace treaty with Israel.
Considering the possibility that pro-democratic forces in the western world could have manufactured or stimulated these protests, what are the odds that it is the case? What improvement would revolutions bring in Tunisia and Egypt if they already are friends of the western world and of Israel? What supplemental benefits would pro-democratic interests and players from the West receive from all this?
Considering now the possibility that fascist/reactionnary elements in the western world have been working in the shadows to foment these uprisings, now the possibility is much more distinct. If we take the same three elements concerning Tunisia and Egypt, you see that Islamists/Jihadists and their Fascist International sponsors have every interests to foment trouble in these countries favorable to the West and Israel. They would like very much indeed to seize power to be able to implement Islamic governments with Sharia as the governing Law. It is obvious because Islamists have a corporate fascism view of capitalism. Then, the Fascist International with their proxy warriors, the Islamists pro-Sharia fanatics, have all the reasons to try this. Especially at this point.
Besides a few authors such as John Loftus who have identified Muslim Brotherhood and nazi connections with regard to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, some institutions have begun to do the same in an effort to mobilize the citizens of the ‘free’ world against a danger that is rising rapidly in the geo-political arena. In effect, the Center for Security Policy, a think tank based in the U.S., has produced a document this last fall titled: « Sharia: The Threat to America ». Although the document doesn’t venture to pinpoint the mistakes and errors of judgement that Westerners have commited in their war against communism, namely their use of not only nazi war criminals but fanatic Islamists as well to destabilize parts of the U.S.S.R. and China, it nevertheless identifies clearly the Muslim Brotherhood as being the center group that is doing the covert undermining and slow sabotaging of the liberal world here and abroad. This document of the Center For Security Policy exposes the connections between all Islamic groups and the way they coordinate their work in order to take over the ‘free’ world.
So the Islamists have been exposed in their attempt to co-opt the liberal world or social-democracy and transform it into a Sharia-based society. It is expected now that they will react swiftly and strongly and I suspect that is exactly what is going on in North Africa these days, still with the help and ‘encouragement’ from their Fascist International sponsors. But we will have to wait for the dust to settle in order to have a clearer view of the situation. The action is just beginning. Stay tuned.