Alberta and Quebec: the birth of the new Canada

First, let me congratulate you, Neil, for having written this piece. By the way, the alchemical reference in the title is terrific. I think you begin to get the picture. Canada, historically, used to be a bipolar entity run by Ottawa, where resides federal power, and by Quebec with its « société distincte » based on language and culture.  So Ontario and Quebec used to be the two provinces where decisions were made or where trends were manufactured or developed. Now, in the 21st century, things are changing. With a planet of roughly 7 billion inhabitants, energy is a key element in the composition of a state.

In that regard, it is only logical that Alberta emerges now as the new center for English-Canada. Oil being increasingly determinant in shaping countries’s foreign policy, the province imposes itself as the new voice for stating the political agenda in the country. And Quebec, being already a giant in the production of electricity, may keep its position as a leader of influence, and even more if you consider that the province decided to add the oil-and-gas-industry to its portfolio and to undertake the exploitation of the Old Harry pit and of shale gas deposits in the St-Lawrence valley. If Ontario and Quebec used to be the two main voices in Canada until today, now it is Alberta and Quebec. Why Ontario isn’t anymore a leader in Canada, would you ask? Maybe because Ontario is synonymous with the past, when Canada was considered to be not much more than just a colony where companies could pillage natural resources and exploit the population for its workforce capabilities. In those years, much emphasis was being put on Canada’s inclusion in the Commonwealth and its disguised submission to the british royal family. In other terms, that vision of the country, which was fabricated for the 19th century when the country itself was born, is now outdated.

Like everything else, the political life evolves and countries with it. That is why the arrival of the Conservative Party is something interesting. Overall, they have a vision of the country, of foreign policy, of geo-politics that is much more mature than the one of the other parties. And the Bloc Québécois, after 20 years, begins to show cracks in the wall as many Quebeckers ask themselves about the pertinence to keep a sovereignist party in Ottawa that can’t do the sovereignty anyway and leaves us in the opposition forever. I always voted for the Bloc since its inception. But this coming election, I will vote for the Conservatives. They have a lot of policies with which I disagree…but they support Israel. You see, Israel is the barometer of a country’s foreign policy. You wanna know where a country lies on the geo-political scale? Check its policy toward Israel. It tells all. The fact that the Conservatives support Israel means that they would increase the pressure on Islamists, use tribunals to expulse them out of the country, take measures to protect our culture, our civilization and our values, etc. But, most importantly, it means that they get the picture of the geo-political theater and have a good take on the actors that are playing in it.

The Bloc Québécois was born when MPs from Quebec split away from their parties after the Meech Lake debacle. To use an image, it is almost as if the Progressive faction of the Progressive Conservative Party would have split. It probably has, since the Party slowly disintegrated afterwards. When it was brought back to life through a merger with the Canadian Alliance Party, the Progressive element had disappeared, only the Conservative element remained. You know what? I just had a crazy idea… What if the Conservative Party and the Bloc Québécois create a coalition to allow ourselves to have a majority in the Parliament? Wouldn’t it resemble Alberta and Quebec united? Wouldn’t it resemble a new Progressive Conservative Party? Michel Kelly-Gagnon is right with his analysis. It is time that we move on. And you are right, Neil. The fleur-de-lys and the rose could and can unite. It is probably one of the greatest realization of alchemy if we can achieve it. Let’s keep our eyes on the goal.

article1977524

Afghanistan: Bzrezinski’s Grand Chessboard game and the continuation of the Anglo-Afghan War

Since the early ’80s Paul Fitzgerald and Elizabeth Gould have been highly devoted to expose the truth about what is really going on in Afghanistan. They have travelled there on a few occasions, notably at the very inception of the Afghan War in 1981, in 1983 and also more recently after 9/11. What they have found is extremely different from what you would expect, judging by what you can hear in the mainstream media in the western world. They have produced a documentary titled Afghanistan Between Three Worlds, worked and delivered stories for CBS, ABC, PBS and also have published two very important books, Afghanistan’s Untold Story and their latest, Crossing Zero: the AfPak War at the Turning Point of American Empire. This is an overview here of what they have found in their research.

First of all, I don’t pretend that I can summarize the situation in Afghanistan. It is extremely complex, far more than any westerner can imagine, because Afghanistan is another world. The mainstream media doing the job of blurring all those areas where our thought needs to be educated and informed, we have most of the time a vision of Afghanistan that is caricatural, grotesque, appearing almost coming out of a Lord of the Rings novel. I will try to do my best to sketch the situation as it appears to be according to the information available in the interviews and videos that you can consult on this page. To be able to get the picture about what is going on in Afghanistan, you have to do the efforts yourself to dig in the information and learn. I can’t do it for you.

To begin with, the ISI, the Pakistani intelligence service, which has strong ties to the military, was a creation more or less of the United States from the start. They are in control of the government of Pakistan since its inception in 1947. The Taliban, in turn, are a creation of the ISI. The ISI bring candidates for the Taliban into « seminaries » where they are formed and trained in Pakistan. Also, you have to realize that there are several branches of the Taliban, active in Pashtun territory, in Punjab territory, in Baluchistan which seeks its own independence, and in various areas of Afghanistan, Pakistan and India. So, understandably, the whole region has to be considered as a same geo-political entity. And the Durand Line (1893), which separates Pakistan and Afghanistan, is highly contested and a serious source of conflict that complicates the situation even more.

Second, a long-term geo-political agenda is at play here, which was first implemented in early 19th century by the British Empire. You will remember that Great Britian and Russia were at war at the very beginning of that century (1807-1812) and at other occasions later on, for example during the Crimean War (1853-1856). That was what is called the « Great Game ». But here, it is the reminiscence of the Anglo-Afgha War, with its two phases, 1839-1842 and 1878-1880, that is even more determinant. The foreign policy of Great Britain and of the United States since the beginning of the 20th century is simply an extension, a continuation of that state of perpetual conflict with Russia through Afghanistan and other states in the same area, which were and still are a proxies. Zbigniew Bzrezinski with his Grand Chessboard game is one of the most proeminent modern architect of that strategy today. The general idea is to seal off China and Russia by creating a wall of states and territories that would be friendly to the interests and to the agenda of the U.S. and of other western states. The end goal here is obviously the control of resources, oil, mines, lands, etc. That is why that part of the world is called the Earth Island, a stretch of land that begins at the Detroit of Gibraltar and goes way up to the confines of China. It is in that part of the world where we find the most resources, the most population, the most lands, etc.

Continuer la lecture

Contrer l’ignorance et la propagande haineuse contre les Juifs et Israel: un travail des tous les instants

© Emirsimsek | Dreamstime.com

J’ai rassemblé quelques textes du site web Aschkel Info ainsi que la transcription, disponible sur le site JSS News, d’une conférence donnée par le professeur Alan Dershowitz. En cette période trouble de notre histoire où la propagande et le contrôle de l’information n’ont jamais été aussi omniprésents et déterminants, il est essentiel de remettre les pendules à l’heure pour aider nos concitoyens et compatriotes à comprendre les vrais enjeux, afin qu’ils puissent ainsi résister intelligemment et de façon efficace. Il serait trop long de reprendre point par point le contenu de tous ces articles. Il est plutôt à votre avantage et de votre devoir de le faire vous-mêmes, puisque cette information n’a pas passé à travers le prisme déformant de la propagande médiatique occidentale, vendue aux islamistes.

Voyez-vous, l’Occident craint de manquer d’énergie dans les prochaines années si jamais la Chine ou la Russie réussit à prendre le contrôle des ressources pétrolières au moyen-Orient et en Afrique. Comme Israel est un pays modéré, démocratique, européen de culture et donc incompatible avec le fascisme islamique qui est en vogue présentement, toute une série de mesures sont mises en place pour attaquer Israel et le dénigrer au niveau international, et tout ça pour faire plaisir à nos « alliés » islamistes, notamment les Frères musulmans. Soit dit en passant, la philosophie économique et financière adoptée par les islamistes se réclame d’un penseur musulman du XIVième siècle, Ibn Khaldun. Il propose système capitaliste basée sur les corporations, tout à fait compatible avec les systèmes fascistes du vingtième siècle que l’on a vu naître, comme l’Italie mussolinienne et l’Allemagne nazie. En gros, l « entente » est la suivante: les islamistes collaborent avec les efforts occidentaux de déstabilisation de la Russie, de la Chine et au fond de l’Orient en général pour sécuriser son accès au pétrole, et en retour, les occidentaux permettent aux islamistes d’assumer plus de leadership au niveau politique et de déverser leur fiel haineux envers les Juifs, fiel qui est présent je vous le rappelle dans le texte même du Coran. La haine des Juifs n’a pas commencé avec la création de l’État d’Israel. Si on se concentre uniquement sur l’Islam pour les fins de notre discussion, il est bon de savoir que la première chose que Mahomet a fait après avoir conquis la péninsule arabique au 7ième siècle, a été d’exterminer les Juifs. Tout un démocrate, hein? D’autres passages du Coran appellent les croyants à tuer les Juifs, à mentir au non-musulmans, etc. C’est pourquoi l’information présentée ici doit être véhiculée et partagée avec vos amis, familles et connaissances. Il en va de notre avenir à tous et d’une paix durable sur Terre.

J’ai également joint un vidéo montrant des célébrations tenues lors de l’anniversaire de la libération de la vieille cité de Jérusalem. Observez bien l’énergie qui se dégage. Est-ce que ça ressemble à ce qu’on dit des Juifs dans les médias, à savoir que ce sont des gens remplis de haine, qui ont soif de sang, qui ne peuvent s’empêcher de tuer, torturer et d’expulser des pauvres Palestiniens? Pas du tout, on le voit par ces images. Les Juifs sont, de façon générale, des gens doux, gentils, aimables, pacifiques, démocrates. En fait, ce qu’il faut comprendre, c’est que ce que l’on reproche aux Juifs dans les médias occidentaux en termes de comportements et attitudes, ce sont les islamistes et les Arabes qui les incarnent la plupart du temps. Hitler parlait de la propagande comme étant l’art de complètement renverser les faits. C’est exactement ce qui se passe ici avec la propagande anti-juive et anti-israelienne. Réveillez-vous avant qu’il ne soit trop tard.

Terre juive, terre arabe

Si la paix vous intéresse

Identité historique des Palestiniens

Alan Dershowitz

Michel Duguay en entrevue à Dutrizac: Sortons le Québec du nucléaire!

Le porte-parole du mouvement « Sortons le Québec du nucléaire », Michel Duguay, présente ici les raisons pour lesquelles la société québécoise devrait tirer un trait sur le nucléaire comme source d’énergie. En gros, on peut résumer la situation comme suit: le nucléaire coûte cher à opérer, on doit gérer les déchets radioactifs et c’est très coûteux, il comporte des risques pour la santé qui sont énormes, les conséquences d’un accident sont difficiles à gérer et nous avons déjà passablement de sources d’énergie avec les barrages électriques et l’éolien. Nous n’avons pas besoin de Gentilly 2. Les événements qui se sont produits au Japon sont un élément de plus dans la balance.

audioplayer.php?mp3=94797