The Libyan operation: another piggy back coup?

In Dave Emory’s FTR #735, we have seen that the « uprisings » in the Middle East are probably to a large extent the results of a vaste operation conducted by the intelligence agencies of the West in order to change the leadership in that area of the Earth. Although there is nobody more convinced than me that these regimes need to be changed for democratic ones, I have been, as Dave Emory and other observers of the geo-political scene, more than skeptical about the « democratic » nature of the so-called revolutions. And with reason. When you have been deceived more than once, as it is the case with several events that happened since WWII, you develop a certain apprehension, prudence and carefulness when dealing with sudden changes.

Now, is the Libyan operation a piggy back coup on the Egyptian one, which was in itself a piggy back coup on the Tunisian operation? It is possible. In an earlier post, I have already said that Khadafi should remain in power for the moment, at least temporarily, to fight  back against Islamists forces, because the risks of such a takeover is too great in case of an overthrow. First, let me ask you this: where do the rebels get their weapons to fight Khadafi forces? Well…I guess that is one information that we don’t have but it is definitely important. In effect, in order to have weapons the rebels must buy or obtain them from a source that is ready to provide such weapons to that group, knowing very well that they will serve to try to overthrow Khadafi. So who is selling these weapons to the rebels? I don’t know. It is the job of the journalists to find out anyway but nobody does a particularly good job at this for the moment.

Second, haven’t you noticed that Libya shares a border with Sudan? The last time I checked, the north part of the country was controlled by Islamists and terrorists, while the south part has recently voted in favour of its secession from the north, its citizens being tired of the incessant harassment, killings, tortures, rapes, etc, brought so « generously » by the Islamic Jihad of the northmen. Maybe the weapons with which the « rebels » of Libya are fighting against Khadafi are coming in fact from the Islamists of North Sudan. That would be logical. And from whom these North Sudan Islamic Jihad warriors get their weapons? Again, and I don’t want to be patronizing, but it is the journalists’s job to bring these facts to the light of day. The operation launched by the Coalition Forces against Khadafi, although maybe sincere, might prove fatal in the long run for western civilization. Khadafi is definitely the strongest man in the area and if he falls, I don’t see who could be able to stand against the Islamists and their western sponsors.

According to Dave Emory, this vaste operation launched in the Middle East has got the approval of both branches of the CIA/State Department, the Democrat branch and the Republican branch (for that matter, see the  interview with John Loftus FTR #731). It is probably the truth. However, I fail to see how the Democrat branch would be able to recuperate those messy countries and bring them to democratic parlementary or presidential governments after such violent and improvised overthrows. Democratic life is not like flipping a switch. It doesn’t take on immediately. It takes time, during which any totalitarian mafia can organise itself and seize power. It will be interesting to see what measures the Democrat branch of the CIA/State Department will put in places to make sure that these countries really get on the path of democracy. But it will certainly have to counteract first the machinations of the Republican branch, and that is not small stuff.

Also, and Emory alluded to it in its last show FTR #736, one possibility that is certainly foreseeable, is that a plan is under implementation to create a wall between the western world and an Eastern Block of nations that may form in the near future or already in formation, that may comprise China, Russia, India, Pakistan and satellite nations such as Vietnam, North Korea, maybe Japan, etc. Is the West trying to secure oil reserves in anticipation for a takeover of these by entities created by or under control of a number of states of such an Eastern Block? It is certainly possible. If one takes China alone, just by the growing demand in energy of its population of 1.5 billion people, that’s enough to make anyone envision the worst scenarios. And I am even not mentioning here the fact that China is still a communist regime and that we don’t know for sure to what extent Russia has really succeeded in extinguishing the soviet flame or its imperialistic ambitions. That certainly doesn’t help the situation either.

I will cease here the speculation. Just keep your eyes open and question everything you are told. I think that is the best attitude. I have attached two news. The first concerns the  latest « facts » about the Libyan « uprising » and the next covers sudden investments made by the Saudis in the Middle East. According to you, are the Saudis trying to calm down the population by injecting money into the economy or are they securing their earlier investments because they know very well that they will become even more profitable in the near future? I will let you decide.

west-pounds-libya-with-air-strikes-tomahawks

saudis-boost-middle-east-stocks

1 600 guerriers de l’Arctique débarquent à la Baie-James

1600 soldats canadiens, français, américains et polonais(?) s’entraînent actuellement dans le secteur de la Baie James. Le poste de commandement est situé à Radisson, tandis que les sites d’entraînement sont localisés à l’intérieur de communautés cries.  Quel est la raison d’être de l’exercice? Selon le journal Métro, « en ce qui concerne le scénario global, l’exercice consiste en la simulation d’un sommet international sur l’environnement. Les militaires prennent part à divers scénarios dans lesquels ils ont à assurer la sécurité du sommet et à effectuer des opérations de recherche et de sauvetage ».

Je vous avoue que je suis sceptique quant au but réel des manoeuvres. Pourquoi aller spécialement à la Baie James alors qu’il y a des centaines d’autres lieux au Canada où l’on peut s’entraîner dans des conditions nordiques? Non. J’ai plutôt l’impression que des responsables de ces quatre pays craignent soit un attentat terroriste sur les barrages électriques de la Baie James, par Al-Qaeda ou un autre groupe, soit une attaque provenant du passage du Nord-Ouest, de l’Océan Arctique, de la Baie d’Hudson comme telle, etc, et  qu’ils ont décidé de synchroniser leur stratégie. Des pays organisés en alliance comme l’Iran, la Russie, avec la participation de groupes islamiques et peut-être l’assentiment tacite d’autres pays comme la Chine et le Vénézuela, pourraient être en mesure de lancer une attaque dévastatrice sur le Québec et le Canada. Puisque ces barrages alimentent en partie les États-Unis, le gouvernement américain ne peut pas être insensible à ce scénario. Sans doute ces manoeuvres sont-elles les premières expressions de l’accord sur la zone nord-américaine de sécurité négociée dernièrement entre les trois leaders Nord-américains. Pour ce qui est de l’implication de la Pologne, qui est moins évidente à première vue, il se peut que leur proximité géographique avec la Russie en fasse un allié de taille. Il est aussi possible que la Pologne se souvienne du génocide d’Auschwitz et qu’elle fera tout en son pouvoir pour éviter qu’il se reproduise sur son territoire. Avec des fanatiques religieux à la tête de l’Iran et la montée mondiale du fascisme islamique qui est d’inspiration nazie, les Polonais pourraient bien lutter très férocement cette fois-ci pour contrer une attaque contre leur pays et leur nation, où la présence juive est importante.

788428–1-600-guerriers-de-l-arctique-debarquent-a-la-baie-james