Another chapter in the never-ending saga of anti-semitism and nazi cover-up has been deployed recently, as Ukrainian organizations complain about foreign intervention of intellectuals over the content of the Canadian Museum for Human Rights. An advocacy group, the Ukrainian Canadian Civil Liberties Association, and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress, are accused of distorting historical account of the Holodomor, the genocide perpetrated by Soviet Russia in Ukraine in 1932-33. In a letter signed by a hundred scholars around the globe and published last week, the foreign intellectuals also claim that the UCCLA and the UCC refuse to acknowledge the role played by Ukrainian nationalist movements in the Holocaust. Also, the UCCLA and the UCC are having a different with the Museum on the issue of the place that the Holocaust should occupy in the physical space of the building. They argue that there shouldn’t be a separate room for the Holocaust, or that there should be a room for the Holodomor also, to avoid that such an approach « elevates » the suffering of a particular group to the detriment of other groups.
The first article of the Globe and Mail, that you find below, ends with this sentence: « Others are well known for making unfounded allegations concerning the nature and behaviour of the Ukrainian nationalist movement of the 20th century, assertions serious scholars have dismissed as prejudicial. » If I may try to bring more « foundation » for these accusations, here is an extract from a book authored by John Loftus and titled America’s Nazi Secret, which is the new edition of the original The Belarus Secret. Loftus is a former U.S. government prosecutor for many years. He is also a prolific author acclaimed by the critics. In the early ’80s, he was in charge of the Belarus file for the U.S. Justice Department. His job was to hunt down Belarus Nazis. He had the privilege to read the Top Secret Files and made some astonishing discoveries on a variety of topics, including the Ukrainian File. So, in America Nazi Secret we read, about Mykola Lebed:
« Anti-Nazi resistance leader, indeed. The CIA and Congress were thoroughly suckered in. Lebed had been the head of the SB, the Ukrainian version of the Gestapo. His men murdered tens of thousands of Polish, Jewish and Ukrainian citizens. I know this is true because I found the original files of Mykola Lebed in the Army Intelligence vaults at Suitland, Maryland, and showed them to my two superiors at the Justice Department: Ryan and Sullivan. It will be impossible for them to deny that they were briefed in detail before allowing this killer to enter the United States. » (p. 28)
and now about the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, headed by Stepan Bandera:
« The CIC (the Counter-Intelligence Corps, precision mine: C.H.) had an agent who photographed eleven volumes of Lebed’s secret internal files of OUN/Bandera. These files clearly show how most of its members worked for the Gestapo or SS as policemen, executioners, partisan hunters, and municipal officials. The OUN contribution to the German war effort was significant, including the raising of volunteers for several SS divisions. It was precisely because of its work with the Nazis that Wisner (the head of the Office of Policy Coordination, precision mine: C.H.) wanted to hire the OUN for his Special Forces. The Ukrainian letter succeeded in fooling the immigration officials, however, and OUN/Bandera was subsequently taken off the inimical list. » (p. 194)
Now you understand why these Ukrainian organizations, the UCCLA and the UCC, are not particularly enchanted by this letter published by the foreign scholars. You also have to know that nazi war criminals, including Ukrainians, have been smuggled everywhere around the world, in every country imaginable, and in Canada as well. So it is conceivable that descendants of these Ukrainian who have « immigrated » to Canada, and their families, might feel a little uncomfortable with being reminded of the past too much. Their efforts to mute and discredit these foreign scholars and to present a counter-propaganda explain themselves easily.
Latest blog entry from anti-fascist researcher Dave Emory. Two things here to focus your attention. First, Emory presents the Hamas Charter, which is nothing else than the old anti-semitic routine that we have heard so much through centuries, and lately with nazism. Second, there is a link to a video on LiveLeak, which shows an execution of Fatah operatives by Hamas troops. It seems that Hamas don’t try to negociate, make deals, have a discussion or a vote. They are not interested with accommodations, middle grounds or any such thing that we are used to in democratic societies. They make the law as it used to be in Antiquity.
Question: Are you sure Israel and the Jews are the bad guys with people like that around? Well, you should check your facts again. A good site to help you with that is HonestReporting. They debunk anti-Israel propaganda that comes from the Middle East and they report it as soon as it comes. So first check Dave Emory’s blog entry and then pay a visit to HonestReporting:
Honestly Obama, I am not following anymore. You presented yourself as a progressive, somebody who would uphold democratic values and principles. Acccording to your own speeches, you said that America had to cease the « kind of behavior that has affected us for so long »… And now you’re giving Poppy Bush the Medal of Freedom? I think there’s been some kind of a mistake. Haven’t you read Russ Baker’s Family of Secrets and John Loftus’ books? The Bush Family participated in laundering nazi money during WWII, they are apparently linked to a milieu (among other institutions the Office of Policy Coordination and the Department of Justice) that helped to smuggle nazi war criminals to America, and they made a lot of other things that would be too long here to enumerate. Prescott Bush, the grand-father, and his son, George H.W. Bush, have played a key role in these machinations, while George W. Bush is a more benign figure. Frankly, I think you have mislead us. You are not a progressive. Everything was a deception. Thank you very much for the marvelous show and the terrific emotions that you made us feel. But next time, I think I will go see a movie instead of listening to you. The ‘decoration’ of this great American ‘hero’ happens around 26:30 in the video here. Enjoy.
I would like very much that the Egyptian revolution be genuine. It probably is, in the sense that people who gather in central Cairo are young Egyptians desperate to have a job, some money in their pockets and some food in their stomach. They demand for democratic changes to be able to better their situation and have a life, finally. That’s great. My apprehensions remain on the aftermath of all this. The Muslim Brotherhood hasn’t dissolved into thin air since the beginning of this popular uprising. They kept themselves at a distance, more or less into passivity. Will they accept that a democratic government take control of Egypt if President Moubarak leaves now? Well, that remains to be seen. As far as I’m concerned, they haven’t abandonned the Jihadist and pro-Sharia agenda that they used to have so far. The way I see the Muslim Brotherhood, they are the equivalent of the CIA for the Muslim World. They infiltrate, analyse, study their opponents and with a strategy to defeat them. Is it possible that they are simply waiting in the dark, willingly using these democratic protesters to do the dirty job of ousting the dictator for them, in order to seize power after he has left the country? I think it is a distinct possibility.
Dave Emory in his last For the Record show FTR#734 refered to the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in the early years of the twentieth century. Effectively, a more moderate group, the Mensheviks leaded by Martov, was trying to bring about a revolution as well. Both groups, Bolsheviks and Mensheviks, were competing to do it and at first, the Mensheviks were the ones who succeeded to implement the first stages of the process. But in the end, the Bolsheviks, the more radicalized group of these two, violent and anti-liberal, probably better trained in propaganda and tactics, recuperated the movement and chased the Mensheviks from power. Many of them went into exile after this. The spectre of a new manifestation of this sociological drama is waving in the distance in the so-called Egyptian revolution. The Egyptian democrats, the equivalent of the Mensheviks in this case, those who believe in democracy and in the liberal system, might end up doing the dirty job for the Muslim Brotherhood, the equivalent of the Bolsheviks.
Some observers have made the case that foreign influence might be at work in both Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings. While German and Sweden nationals have been arrested recently in Tunisia with weapons, which is definitely curious and dubious, the Moubarak government itself is putting the blame for the uprising on western influence. Western journalists are even harassed and beaten sometimes by the angry mobs. So I think that, in order to have a real understanding of the situation, we have to reach out again and use the marvelous science of geo-politics. It comes down to this: what are the signs with which we can appreciate the context of the uprisings in terms of western foreign policy in the cases of Tunisia and Egypt? Here are three basic facts to take under consideration:
- Tunisia and Egypt already are non-Islamic states;
- Tunisia and Egypt are ‘friends’ with the western world and Israel;
- Egypt has signed a peace treaty with Israel.
Considering the possibility that pro-democratic forces in the western world could have manufactured or stimulated these protests, what are the odds that it is the case? What improvement would revolutions bring in Tunisia and Egypt if they already are friends of the western world and of Israel? What supplemental benefits would pro-democratic interests and players from the West receive from all this?
Considering now the possibility that fascist/reactionnary elements in the western world have been working in the shadows to foment these uprisings, now the possibility is much more distinct. If we take the same three elements concerning Tunisia and Egypt, you see that Islamists/Jihadists and their Fascist International sponsors have every interests to foment trouble in these countries favorable to the West and Israel. They would like very much indeed to seize power to be able to implement Islamic governments with Sharia as the governing Law. It is obvious because Islamists have a corporate fascism view of capitalism. Then, the Fascist International with their proxy warriors, the Islamists pro-Sharia fanatics, have all the reasons to try this. Especially at this point.
Besides a few authors such as John Loftus who have identified Muslim Brotherhood and nazi connections with regard to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, some institutions have begun to do the same in an effort to mobilize the citizens of the ‘free’ world against a danger that is rising rapidly in the geo-political arena. In effect, the Center for Security Policy, a think tank based in the U.S., has produced a document this last fall titled: « Sharia: The Threat to America ». Although the document doesn’t venture to pinpoint the mistakes and errors of judgement that Westerners have commited in their war against communism, namely their use of not only nazi war criminals but fanatic Islamists as well to destabilize parts of the U.S.S.R. and China, it nevertheless identifies clearly the Muslim Brotherhood as being the center group that is doing the covert undermining and slow sabotaging of the liberal world here and abroad. This document of the Center For Security Policy exposes the connections between all Islamic groups and the way they coordinate their work in order to take over the ‘free’ world.
So the Islamists have been exposed in their attempt to co-opt the liberal world or social-democracy and transform it into a Sharia-based society. It is expected now that they will react swiftly and strongly and I suspect that is exactly what is going on in North Africa these days, still with the help and ‘encouragement’ from their Fascist International sponsors. But we will have to wait for the dust to settle in order to have a clearer view of the situation. The action is just beginning. Stay tuned.
This satellite tv broadcasts disgusting propaganda. They have a series in which a blood libel is shown here, in this video, beginning around the half of it. This document has been made to show the similarities between nazism and islamism. A blood libel, in the Middle Ages, was a fabricated story in which Jews were being accused of sacrificiing christian children in order to use their blood in religious rituals. Look at this. This is utterly disgusting!!! This tv network is based in Lebanon…were the Hezbollah reigns!!! Notice as well in the video a Hezbollah meeting where they give the Nazi salute and the indoctrination of young children like with the Hitler Youth! Same mentality, same habits, same conduct. Wake up world!
Qu’est-ce que Schwarzy peut bien avoir à foutre à Montréal? C’est louche… Est-ce que le Troisième Reich activerait ses armes pour déstabiliser notre pays? Aussi, est-il aussi stupide et ignorant qu’il le laisse croire ou n’est-ce pas plutôt une ruse pour ne pas qu’on se méfie de lui? Pour ceux qui ne connaîtraient pas encore Herr Kommandant, lisez la retrancription de l’émission de radio que Dave Emory lui a consacré.