Insecure securities and irregular regulation
The rise of financial terrorism
The Standards and the Poors: Series of articles on how the « downgrade » has been a dog-and-pony show to hurt U.S. economy and citizens
Répondre
Selon Michel Pagé, le Québec accueillerait deux fois trop d’immigrants
Évidemment que si…mais on dirait que nos bons gouvernements, composés de puissants bureaucrates, ministres et députés, ne le comprennent pas. Le nombre d’immigrants qu’une société accueille doit être établi en fonction de la capacité d’intégration, des perspectives d’emploi, de la langue parlée et du bagage que les immigrants apportent avec eux. La règle générale, c’est que plus le nombre de nouveaux arrivants augmente, plus cela devient difficile. Vous n’avez qu’à penser à un ascenseur. Il y a une capacité limite que l’ascenseur peut supporter de façon sécuritaire, sans parler du confort des passagers. Les sociétés humaines fonctionnent de façon similaire mais les responsables de l’immigration dans les pays occidentaux ne tiennent pas compte de cela. Ils accueillent des immigrants comme on entasse des articles de seconde main chez un brocanteur. Décidément, on est gouverné par des idiots.
Annie Jacobsen and Ralph Steiner on Roswell and UFOs: Two examples of disinformation
Peter B. Collins of the Peter B. Collins Show interviewed recently two individuals who pretend to be able to bring some light on the Roswell incident in particular and on the UFO phenomenon in general. The first interview, recorded or posted on June 22nd, features author Annie Jacobsen who presents new unknown « facts » about the UFO phenomenon and the Roswell incident. In a new book, Area 51: An Uncensored History of America’s Top Secret Military Base, she « reports » that the vast majority of UFO sightings in the ’50s and ’60s were caused by U-2 spy planes, that Area 51 held some captured Soviet MIG fighters, etc. The most bizarre assertion in the book is that the Roswell incident was in fact the result of a crash of a Soviet craft occupied by humans who had been genetically altered using Josef Mengele’s experiments in biology and genetics. The second interview, recorded or posted on August 22nd, features Ralph Steiner, jounalist and scientist. He tries to build to case that the Roswell craft and its inhabitants were from outside this planet. He uses original interviews from 1947 and onward to illustrate that. He states, among other things, that the « weather balloon » theory was a cover story. He disagrees strongly with Annie Jacobsen that the Roswell craft and its inhabitants could have been the works of Stalin.
I could continue the analyses of these two shows but there is no point. We have here two examples of pure and unadulterated disinformation. Whether Annie Jacobsen has been deceived, as a ufologist claims it is the case according to Peter B., whether she let herself being deceived or that she is herself the cause or the messenger of the deception is not clear. I don’t know. But the fact remains that almost everything she says about UFOs and Roswell is just pure B.S.. I’m sorry but that’s the truth. As was remarkably clarified and established by Dave Emory in his research on the subject, UFOs are the product of nazi research during WWII. In effect, Renato Vesco’s book Intercept—But Don’t Shoot remains to this day the most credible source of information on the UFO phenomenon. The only reason why the discoveries and inventions of the Nazis, in terms of physics, don’t belong in the public domain for the moment is that they lost the military war. But they are winning the economic, financial and propaganda wars so soon enough these inventions will be part of our lives, but not before the Bormann Capital Network, or Underground Reich, has finished to implement his domination over the entire world. The crash at Roswell involved a craft of human origin inhabited by humans. Period. Everything else in just propaganda. The fact that Annie Jacobsen replaces the bogus story about weather balloons by the bogus story about U-2 spy planes is not impressive, and her claim that it was the creation of Soviet Russia is completely hilarious. Continuer la lecture
La campagne de salissage contre Pauline Marois: lorsque déception et amertume se transforment en croisade
C’est vrai que cela n’a pas été facile de digérer la défaite référendaire de 1995. Étant passés si proches de faire la souveraineté, nous étions tous « à terre », défaits, déçus, amers, fâchés, désappointés et le reste. Pour la chronique, j’étais présent à la réunion des « Jeunes pour la souveraineté », ou quelque chose du genre, le soir du vote dans une salle du centre-ville de Montréal. Les premiers résultats nous donnaient l’impression de gagner le référendum et puis soudain, comme si quelqu’un avait « joué » avec les chiffres, le vote s’est renversé à la surprise générale. L’idée selon laquelle les élections sont « arrangées » revient souvent dans les discussions de salon et de cuisine entre amis et voisins, et je dirais que cette fois-là j’ai eu de sérieux doutes. Mais comme personne n’a poussé l’enquête dans la communauté politique et journalistique à cet effet, en tant que citoyen, j’ai dû m’y faire et accepter le résultat. En passant, si le sujet vous intéresse, vous pouvez écouter une entrevue radio avec Peter B. Collins et son invité Bob Fitrakis où ce dernier raconte comment l’élection de 2004 a été volée par les Républicains aux États-Unis grâce à un stratagème informatique. On se souvient que celle de 2000 avait été volée elle aussi et c’était vraiment flagrant. Est-il possible que des stratagèmes du genre soient appliqués parfois dans des élections au Canada? Humm, bonne question.
Toujours est-il que l’on se retrouve plus de quinze ans plus tard avec un Québec en complet marasme. Plus rien ne bouge. Bien vite, on verra le bouclier canadien se déplacer sous nos pieds tellement on n’avance plus. Les députés du Parti Québécois qui ont démissionné dernièrement se sont comportés en vrais imbéciles, de façon immature, grossière et irresponsable. Si Pauline Marois avait suggéré de biffer l’Article 1 du Programme du Parti Québécois, si elle avait renié René Lévesque ou fait quelque chose de semblable, là, O.K., je trouverais leur attitude et leur comportement acceptable et louable. Mais démissionner pour un amphithéâtre, c’est idiot. Les députés démissionnaires n’ont plus aucune crédibilité tant qu’à moi. Continuer la lecture
Kanon the Preacher: What is wrong with that kid?
Seeing this video gave me pause. Is he possessed, mind-controlled or brainwashed? Or is he under some kind of hypnotic suggestion or control from the outside? Is there a spirit, a ghost that has taken control of him? To exhibit such kind of behavior at this age is not normal. I suspect that there is something wrong that is interfering in the normal development of that child. Every child has the right to receive the best education and treatment possible to permit him/her to grow up sanely and in a healthy way. I can understand the propaganda purpose of an adult preacher who would say that there is only one god and that this god is no one else than Jesus, but these words don’t mean anything in the mouth of a child. Only a grown man or woman can talk about and understand the deep significations of theological and philosophical subtleties. Care is of the essence here.
Frank Schaeffer on the Evangelical cloak of the Republican Party
Radio host Peter B. Collins receives in this podcast Frank Schaeffer, ex-Evangelical leader for many years in the U.S.. Son of Reconstructionist preacher Francis Schaeffer, Frank has a lot to say about the links that exist between the Republican Party and the Evangelical movement. According to him, that movement has literally taken over the Party. It dictates its policies to the political establishment. Among the many representatives of this trend, Schaeffer mentions Michelle Bachmann who, apparently, is under the spell of the Evangelicals. He goes at length to explain how her politics are the expression of the Evangelical background that she has. Schaeffer also takes the opportunity to present certain parts of the material of his new book Sex, Mom and God, and to talk about his father in relation with the Evangelical movement. Globally, I found this interview rather relevant. Having a master degree in Religious Studies, I am always curious about personal religious backgrounds, narratives and stories. Although I have got away from the religious scene for the most part, out of boringness and sometimes disgust and distrust, it is always interesting to see elements like that surging where you expect them the least.
I share a good part of the explanations presented by Frank Schaeffer here on this subject, but not totally. First of all, I am not sure that the Evangelical movement has taken over the Republican Party. I rather have the impression that it is the Republican Party that uses the Evangelical movement as a cloak to better hide its machinations. People with cash and power don’t have religious beliefs; if they really had, they probably wouldn’t be rich and powerful. The world is not run by religion; it is run by money and money gives power. I totally respect the opinion of somebody like Frank Schaeffer who survived the mind-control and brainwash environment of such a movement, but I think it is more accurate to think that the Evangelical movement is used as yet another tool, garment, cloak, etc, to engineer the American society and the whole world into a pre-determined totalitarian reactionary agenda. In numerous articles in the past, I have said, along with heroic researcher Dave Emory, that the Republican Party is fascist in nature, having among other things links to the Third Reich that go back to WWII. Continuer la lecture
Conrad Black on riots in Britain
Conrad Black is back, it appears. His recent take on riots in Britain published in the National Post is quite good. In effect, these riots are the resulting effect of more than 50 years of welfare state in the western world. Another columnist, Father Raymond J. De Souza, does a similar analysis and take a look at other sources of decay. Also, if you want to hear someone expressing his frustrations and anger in relation with these riots, listen to Pat Condell here, in a previous article.
Ctirad Masin, an example of Resistance
Last week a Czechoslovak resistance fighter died at the venerable age of 81. What strikes me as particular and interesting in his case, is that his family fought both the Nazis and the Communists to liberate the Czech and the Slovak peoples from the oppression of totalitarian ideologies. Because, as you may know probably, « resistance » fighters or partisans usually fight only one side of the political spectrum: If they are Fascists they fight the Communists, and if they are Communists, they fight the Fascists, but rarely both back to back as the Masin family did. I just thought it was unusual and that it needed to be stressed out. It seems that I am not the only one who doesn’t believe in totalitarian systems and who is willing to fight them all indiscriminately.
Addendum on Greek Tragedy and the Rape of Europe: The Rise of the Fourth Reich
In a recent article, I was trying to make the point that the European Union was in fact the historic realization of nazi Greater Europe, or Greater Germany, envisioned by Hitler and other people. This week, a Mail Online article came as a confirmation to what anti-fascist researcher Dave Emory has been saying for years and that I completely support and agree with. The European Union is a farce, a masquerade by which Germany has taken control of all European countries with the Euro and other means. European politician Nigel Farage is one of the few critics of the European Union, so once again I am making the suggestion that you take the time to listen to him, after you read the article, here.
L’universitaire égyptien Hamed Abdel-Samad sur l’effondrement du monde musulman
Finalement, je crois que l’on va y arriver. L’islam va s’effondrer. Tout ce que nous avons à faire est de garder le cap et de continuer à résister. Étant habitué au discours de propagande des islamistes qui prétendent que l’islam va conquérir le monde et le reste, nous demeurons sceptiques à tout ce qu’ils peuvent bien dire. Or, en voilà un qui affirme que sa civilisation va s’effondrer! S’il le dit, c’est que les faits doivent être accablants. Il ne se permettrait jamais de spéculer sur un sujet aussi délicat et dangereux si les « preuves » n’étaient pas indiscutables. Venant de quelqu’un de l’intérieur et non pas d’un Occidental, cela donne encore plus de crédibilité au discours. Je vous propose deux articles du très bon site Poste de veille sur le sujet.