JOIGNEZ LA RÉSISTANCE ET LE COMBAT CONTRE LA TYRANNIE MONDIALISTE AFIN DE DÉFENDRE LA CIVILISATION, LA TRADITION, LA LIBERTÉ ET LA MÉDECINE…AVANT QU'IL NE SOIT TROP TARD!
Where the hell has gone the man who has been elected President on November 8th 2016? One wonders. Lou Dobbs nailed it in a few minutes on his show on March 6th 2019. His commentary on the matter runs from 11:56 through 15:42 minutes of this video. It is a beauty. He expresses here the confusion that many on the Right have felt for months now. We don’t recognize anymore the man that we have supported during the presidential campaign and during the first two years of his presidency. Clearly, something happened that has changed the game and not in the favor of his supporters. It is a dark day for America. As Dobbs says very relevantly: «in politics as in life, it’s important to never forget who your friends are». Red Ice TV contributor Patrick Casey made a similar analysis a few weeks ago, so I am joining the video featuring that as well.
This article is rather difficult to write. I will struggle with many things at the same time so bear with me. We are going through some very troubled times and things are often very complicated to sort out correctly. Let’s begin. The Special Counsel Investigation into Russian interference has become a real witch-hunt against President Trump, anybody can see that. The investigation is leaded by Robert Mueller who was the head of the FBI when 9/11 happened. What does it have to do with the investigation on Trump, you might ask? Probably a lot. I find it particularly curious that the officer in charge of that witch-hunt against Trump was in that job when the attacks on the World Trade Center occurred on September 11th 2001. After all, among all the responsibilities that the FBI has remains the duty to protect the homeland from terrorist attacks. The Bureau didn’t prove very good on that day and neither the other agencies by the way. How that a bunch of mercenaries from Afghanistan were capable of pulling out something like 9/11 without being detected long before the attacks and wrapped up is completely beyond logic.
During the Presidential campaign, Trump made allusions to 9/11 as something that could have been preventable and he also showed signs, if you read between the lines, that he would like the light being shed on 9/11. Americans and citizens of the world have the right to know the truth about the attacks on the World Trade Center. The official version of 9/11 makes certainly a very nice plot for a movie but that is not what happened in the real world. The facts that are presented to us about 9/11 are misleading and don’t present a picture of events that is credible. No need to say that if such light should be shed on 9/11 one day, Robert Mueller would be among the first people to lose and to lose a lot.
Also, again during the Presidential campaign, Trump promised to ‘drain the swamp’. The Washington swamp is certainly very resilient and they have a lot of power and will to protect their interests, which are very often not compatible with those of the American people. When you observe the kind of shenanigans and gambits that the Clintons and the Clinton Foundation are involved in and the people who are associated with these enterprises, you realize that the elites of this country don’t give a damn about what happens to the little people. The technical term for that is ‘nepotism’. Nepotism happens in a country when the political elites give the jobs, the privileges and so forth to their friends and relatives and not to the people who are either qualified or based on merit. And here, please don’t worry: that nepotism seems to be contagious in the West. It is present in a lot of countries, not just in the U.S.
One of my greatest disappointment with the Trump Presidency is the performance of Attorney General Jeff Sessions. He recused himself in the investigation on Russia interference in U.S. elections. It was a terrible decision of very grave consequences. That paved the way for Rod Rosenstein to take charge of the investigation and nominate Robert Mueller to lead it. That investigation, as we know, as turned into a witch-hunt against President Trump. It now has nothing to do anymore with Russia. It’s all about Trump.
That brings me to talk about the swamp again but a little more precisely this time. I know exactly what is going on with that investigation because what Trump is going through is greatly similar with what I had to endure since I created this blog back in 2010. And I am not the only one here. Thousands of people like me throughout the world had to go through a similar experience. You see, democracy is gone. Now throughout the West, you have these nepotist regimes, disguised as democracies, that use everything they can find to enrich their officials and clients. And one of the most powerful tool they can use is, of course, the judicial system. So they weaponize the police, the courts, the investigation processes and so forth in order to put pressure on the people who are deemed not to be part of their circle of friends, relatives or clients. Concretely, that means that they can put anybody of their political opponents under investigation and, reversely, put off the hook anybody who belongs to their clique.
For President Trump, who promised to drain the swamp and who doesn’t belong with the people who let us down on 9/11, it is clear that it implies this: the swamp has decided that he is guilty and they will investigate him until they find something. That is the modus operandi of the swamp. It is fair to assume, throughout the West, that the local swamp of a country has a black list of individuals to be framed as criminals or/and terrorists. Obviously, if an individual is put under surveillance 24/7, recorded, filmed, tracked, etc, something may come out at some point. It could go as far as planting false evidence to incriminate somebody. When you know what somebody is doing and where he/she is 24/7, it is not complicated to do. But that is not constitutional. The job of the police and the judicial system is to investigate crime and punish crime, not to fabricate crime. The whole purpose, the real purpose in the real world, of the Special Counsel Investigation is to transform President Trump into a criminal. I can say that with a lot of confidence since, as I said earlier, I have been subjected to that same kind of procedure. As a blogger, a political activist and a political dissident, I am not part of the canadian nepotist swamp, to say the least, and every day is a fight to stay alive.
For Trump, it is very easy to predict how it is going to end. After months of being smeared and framed as a criminal, he will be impeached. So President Trump now must act quickly. Two options present themselves here. The first option involves Jeff Sessions. He could terminate Mueller’s investigation with or without firing Rod Rosenstein and Robert Mueller. That would allow him to save his job and the President. Option number two involves Trump. The inaction of Jeff Sessions will force the President to fire Sessions and probably Rosenstein and Mueller to make a clean slate and have a new start. Time is running out. The White House must make a decision. With so much important work to be done on security and on the economy, the Special Counsel Investigation has become a distraction and a drain on resources that must end now. I am wondering what the White House would think about Rudy Giuliani as Attorney General. Let’s see.
It pains me a great deal having to write this article but it is my duty as a responsible citizen to do so, so bear with me. Things are not going well with the Trump Administration. The policies put in place by President Trump are importantly different from those advertised by Candidate Trump and it doesn’t bode well for the future. What we saw in Charlottesville a few weeks ago when the supposed ‘white supremacist’ rally, called Unite The Right, happened was a real circus, a theater of smoke and mirrors to deceive the many. The media lied about it in a way for me that was unprecedented. I knew the media was lying but they surpassed anything I was expecting. Even Fox News, a supposedly right-wing network, lied up to their cheeks. The female host who was describing the events going on live was absolutely horrible, calling rallygoers racists and nazis. She was so completely over the top, unprofessional and dishonest that you were wondering if she was not making a pitch to be hired by some other network. I had to check the station identification logo to be sure.
To set the record straight, here is what happened at Charlottesville, from the facts and witnesses accounts that I could gather. Right-wingers of a variety of school of thought and political philosophy gathered in that town to protest the removal of Confederate monuments, the statue of Robert E. Lee among many. It was also an occasion to meet other right-wingers, to network and create bonds. A lawfull permit was given to the organizers and the police was informed of every detail. Everything was looking good. Rallygoers start to assemble in the morning and the atmosphere was peaceful. The police was monitoring and securing the event. Then the antifa showed up and increased their numbers rapidly. Some of them were armed with clubs and other weapons. Then for some reasons not explained the rally was declared unlawful, the State of Emergency was declared and things deteriorated rapidly. The police, at the request of local authorities clearly not in sync with the ideas and values of rallygoers, pushed Unite the Right participants toward the antifa thugs making them easy targets for injuries of all sorts. What is important to precise here, again according to people who were there such as Richard Spencer and others, is that the perimeter had been set in a way that made rallygoers trapped and had nowhere to go to escape the antifa. So violence broke out between the two groups. That’s a chance that right-wingers brought shields to defend themselves. Then, there was also the incident with the car but we don’t even know if it was intentional. We don’t know the circumstances.
The media portrayed the whole event as a nazi and KKK event while it was nothing of the sort. There might have been a few people with nazi flags but that doesn’t make all rallygoers nazis. Effectively, if your neighbour puts a Bolivian flag on his balcony that doesn’t make the whole neighbourhood Bolivian. You also have to remind yourself that sometimes people in the New Right or the Alt-Right for exemple use nazi paraphernelia as a means of provocation, not because they are real nazis. I agree with Richard Spencer when he says that the Charlottesville rally was a total set up. Everything was ready, the police, local authorities, the media, to be able to present the event as a nazi rally.
But then who was the target of such an extensive operation? Obviously the Alt-Right movement first, which is gaining momentum and in strength rapidly. I think that those who planned this ‘coup’ against the movement wanted to be able to tie in the stain of nazism to the Alt-Right to be able, in turn, to get to President Trump. You see, the media and the Left have been trying unsuccessfully for months to portray Trump as somebody who ‘collude with Russia’. They have been repeating this story over and over again but it doesn’t stick. It is obvious that they have decided to change tactics: If the Russia label doesn’t work maybe the nazi label will. That’s what it was all about. Members of the Alt-Right movement, largely represented at this rally in Charlottesville, were instrumental in providing support to Candidate Trump to assure his victory on November 8. They made the difference, so to speak. So they were targeted to be smeared as nazis in Charlottesville, by the Left and other nefarious forces, to be able to smear Trump himself in a second step as a nazi and discredit him.
Then you have Trump’s response to the events. To be perfectly honest, I am not sure that Trump gets it the way he should. Or maybe he gets it but his entourage don’t let him think besides what Washington expects. In the very dangerous world in which we live, the puck is going very fast. So, in order to survive and win, you have to think fast and act fast. In the aftermath of the rally in Charlottesville, Trump provided a response that was rubber-stamped by the swamp, so to speak. He talked about ‘bigotry, hatred, racism, etc. Then, a few days later, going off script, he provided a much better response when he denounced ‘violence on both sides’. But again that’s not what happened.
It is obvious that Charlottesville was a set up, a very clever, meticulous, articulate information warfare and propaganda operation designed to break Trump’s Presidency. All the signs are there showing that a soft ‘coup’ is under way to overthrow the President and marginalize his supporters. Within the Administration, those who support his agenda and policies are being pushed aside, fired or dismissed. The ousting of Steve Bannon and Sebastian Gorka are sending the signal that the Trump Presidency will not be about what Candidate Trump made campaign on. Also, those who support or used to support President Trump are being kicked out of social media, they see their videos on Youtube being demonetized, censored, they see their access cut from payments services, etc, in other terms they are being targeted for their political ideas. In that regard, everybody can notice that there seems to be more censorship going on since Trump took office than there was during Obama’s Presidency. Obama transfered the control of the internet to ICANN, the organism that delivers names and numbers for websites. Technically, while that is still a matter of interpretation by legal experts and lawyers, that transfert took off the protection offered by the First Amendment on speech, since now it is no longer the government that is in control of the internet but a non-profit organization.
President Trump could have easily denounced that transfer and proposed to cancel it, bringing it back under the government’s control. Why hasn’t he done that? President Trump said a few times that he would defend ‘religious liberty’. Well…there’s just one problem. Religious liberty and freedom of speech are not compatible. If you look at history, you will notice that very often religions were imposed on populations by force, sometimes by the sword. So religions spread throughout the world thanks to their ability to suppress the freedom of speech of those they wanted to convert. As far as I know, all religions of any importance did it. And today, we have to face the problem of Muslims trying to impose shariah law on non-Muslims. To let the Muslims deliver their propaganda in order for them to impose shariah on us is not ‘liberty’. It is folly and submission. When President Trump made his trip to Saudi Arabia to meet with the leaders of the Muslim and Arab nations, he was received and treated as a king. Personally, I am not sure I like it. Islam is a supremacist religion that tolerates nothing and no one outside its realm. When Muslims don’t like somebody, usually, that’s a good sign, a sign that that person is not submitting to shariah and is actually defending our values and freedoms. In that regard, you could say that Muslims are divided on Trump. Some of them like him, others don’t. Recently, Muslim activitst Linda Sarsour proposed the idea that resisting Trump was a form of jihad. Was the whole circus of Charlottesville part of that jihad?
I would like to finish with this broader question: How far are we willing to go in the West to accommodate the Muslim world before getting destroyed? I suggest that you listen to these two witnesses accounts, those of Richard Spencer and James Allsup.
Secure Freedom Radio a consacré aux moins deux émissions complètes de suite sur l’affaire Michael Flynn, qui avait été choisi à l’origine par Donald Trump pour être son conseiller en matière de sécurité nationale. Flynn a démissionné dernièrement suite à des fuites dans les médias concernant des communications téléphoniques qu’il aurait effectuées avec des pays étrangers avant que l’Administration Trump n’entre en fonction le 20 janvier dernier. Les invités de Frank Gaffney lors de ces deux émissions présentent des analyses qui mettent en lumière le fait que la communauté du renseignement aux États-Unis semble être dans un état lamentable. Différentes informations ont été coulées aux grands médias dans le but évident de nuire à l’Administration Trump, voire même de la renverser ou la saboter. Ce n’est pas moi qui le dit, ce sont les invités que vous aurez l’occasion d’entendre lors de ces deux émissions. Le concept d«état profond» essaie d’exprimer l’idée qu’il existe dans un pays un ensemble de professionnels, de bureaucrates, de hauts-fonctionnaires, etc, parmi lesquels se trouvent également des agents de renseignements comme tel, qui ont tendance à se considérer comme faisant parti du «vrai» gouvernement qui existe de façon permanente. Ce gouvernement caché peut, à l’occasion, faire des choses pour préserver ses intérêts, ce qui semble être le cas présentement avec la déstabilisation de l’Administration Trump rendue explicitement visible avec l’affaire Michael Flynn. C’est tout à fait inacceptable, évidemment. Le rôle des professionnels du gouvernement et des agents de renseignement, c’est de défendre leur pays, pas de promouvoir leurs intérêts personnels. L’Administration Trump ne peut pas accepter que son mandat commence de cette façon. Le Président devra réaliser sa promesse électorale de «to drain the swamp», puisqu’il apparaît maintenant évident que beaucoup d’employés du gouvernement américain ont été «tournés» pour agir contre les intérêts du peuple américain et du pays.
L’autre point important que l’affaire Michael Flynn met en lumière — et votre humble serviteur vous le répète depuis des années déjà — c’est que nous, les Occidentaux, avons un problème beaucoup plus gros en terme de sécurité nationale que simplement l’existence de l’État islamique ou nos relations difficiles avec des régimes hostiles comme la Russie, la Chine, la Corée du Nord ou Cuba. Ce sont nos institutions elles-mêmes qui sont attaquées, qui ont été tournées contre nous, la population et ses dirigeants, de telle sorte que l’on a l’impression maintenant que les renards sont en charge du poulailler. Les agences de renseignement américaines doivent aider le Président à mettre en place ses politiques. C’est curieux comme tout ce beau monde était bien tranquille durant la Présidence d’Obama. Comme l’a fait remarquer un des invités de Frank Gaffney, le concept de «politisation du renseignement» vient de prendre une toute nouvelle signification. Je m’arrête ici. Je vous implore d’écouter les entrevues que je vous propose ici et de réfléchir sur ce qui est train d’arriver à nos pays.
