Interview with Fara Mansoor, Part I. The hostage crisis in Iran: A coup d’état against both the Shah and Carter

This fascinating and incredibly massive several hour interview features Fara Mansoor, a member of the Iranian Resistance. It was recorded in January and March 1993 on Dave Emory’s radio show, For The Record, during three separate shows. At the time, Dave Emory had a 4-hour airtime format at his disposal. That’s why he could allow his guest to utilize so much space to talk, present and explain all the different connections, details, etc, about this case, and Fara Mansoor certainly didn’t miss such an opportunity. The wealth and scope of detail in Mansoor’s research is absolutely fantastic, impressive and beyond description. In these times of mass media tyranny, where everything is downsized to its simplest expression and where the Twitter format of 140 characters has relegated the classic tools of expression such as the book, the academic journal, the Ph. D. thesis, the university or scientific research to the antics of history, this interview tastes like an oasis of science, research and intelligence.

In these eight segments, representing the first two shows, that I have attached here for you and that you will find regrouped in the second link titled « The Terror Connection », Fara Mansoor explains something that is never presented anywhere else in the media. In a nutshell, these are the basic elements that you will discover:

The received story about the hostage crisis of 1979 and the Iranian Revolution is a lie. In order to understand what has taken place during these crucial months, one has to know certain facts of history. The first and most important, is that the Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi, has been brought to political power by a coup d’état fomented by the CIA against the moderate and Moscow-backed goverment of Mossadegh in 1953. The connections between U.S. intelligence agencies and governements and the regime of Iran are overt. What is the link between that and the Iranian Revolution, you will ask? This: Richard Helms, former CIA director (1966-1973) and then U.S. ambassador in Iran (1973-1976), learned around 1975 that the Shah had cancer. So the geo-political and geo-strategical motivations that were behind the destitution — because that’s exactly what we are talking about here — of Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953 were sent back in motion again. But this time, it would be the Shah who will have to be replaced by again another fierce anti-communist. Continuer la lecture

The last day of the Soviet Union or the hunting party coup d’état

Relive the last day of the Soviet Union, on December 8th 1991. On that famous day, Stanislav Shushkevich, Head of the Supreme Council of Belarus, Leonid Kravchuk, President of Ukraine and Boris Eltsine, President of Soviet Russia, held a secret meeting at the Viskuli Residence in Belavezha Forest, Belarus. There, they decided the fate of the Soviet Union, in only 24 hours. Mikhail Gorbatchev, who was in Moscow, was unable to prevent it, due apparently to his liberal character or weak position. The three men created a Commonwealth of Independent States to replace the previous structure. The documentary presents the tense hours in which that meeting was conducted and also the most important facts that paved the way for the dissolution of the U.S.S.R. in the months prior.

The Last Day of the Soviet Union

What a better way to « celebrate » November 9th than reading Martin Bormann Nazi in Exile?

On this blessed day for all Nazis, I just thought it would be fair to remind folks about some real history. The Reich didn’t stop their activities on May 1st 1945. It continued underground into the form of a capital network capable of influencing decisions, manufacturing key events, thus directing and changing history. The main character responsible for this was Adolf Hitler’s right-hand man and financier, Martin Bormann. Paul Manning, a wartime reporter for CBS who was trained as a gunner, have written an exceptional book titled Martin Bormann Nazi in Exile. I strongly suggest that you get acquainted with that remarkable research. The book is pivotal in any effort to understand the world of today. I have written a book review that you can access here. You will also find a link to download a PDF version of it and a URL to read it online.

Martin Borman Nazi in Exile

Le passé fasciste de François Mitterand et la formation de l’Union monétaire européenne

Dans sa toute dernière entrée de blog, le chercheur antifasciste et animateur de radio Dave Emory nous rappelle les liens qui existaient entre l’establishment français et parisien, et le fascisme en Europe. Un des acteurs marquants de l’époque, François Mitterand, a été associé à la Croix de Feu et à la Cagoule, deux organisations fascistes qui ont tenté de renverser le gouvernement français en 1938. Or, c’est François Mitterand qui a insisté pour qu’une monnaie commune soit utilisée en Europe au moment de la réunification de l’Allemagne. Comme nous pouvons voir que les effets de cette monnaie commune sont désastreux, certaines questions s’imposent sur les réelles intentions de ceux, incluant Mitterand, qui ont mis de l’avant cette solution. Cette entrée de blog de Dave Emory explore les différents aspects de l’Axe Franco-Allemand et ses répercussions pour aujourd’hui en se servant du cas de François Mitterand et des actions de Robert Zoellick.

Dave Emory sur François Mitterand

La nostalgie de Jérusalem chez les Musulmans. Un bilan par Eliezer Cherki.

Écoutez cette présentation de Eliezer Cherki, orientaliste et islamologue, présentée dans le cadre du colloque L’avenir de Jérusalem, tenu le 13 mars dernier. Cette allocution, d’une qualité exceptionnelle, présente les raisons profondes expliquant la soudaine fascination que les Musulmans éprouvent pour Jérusalem, alors que le nom de la ville n’est même pas mentionné une seule fois dans le Coran. Cherki retrace l’histoire de l’Islam naissant, de son rapport avec Jérusalem et des transformations qu’il subit lors de la période de Médine. Pour vous donner les grandes lignes, au début de l’Islam, les Musulmans priaient en direction de Jérusalem mais cette coutume a été abandonnée à partir de la période de Médine. Dès ce moment, ils tournent plutôt le dos à Jérusalem. Au fil des siècles, les Musulmans ont montré plus ou moins d’indifférence envers Jérusalem, jusqu’au jour de la création d’Israel en 1948. Depuis cette date, ils ont démontré une passion pour Jérusalem qui ne peut s’expliquer autrement que par les raisons présentées par le professeur Cherki. À voir absolument.

3 - Eliezer Cherki from Raison Garder on Vimeo.