The latest spending bill and the National Emergency declaration by President Trump

I am glad that President Trump declared the state of National Emergency on the southern border. However, some people feel very uncomfortable with the spending bill that he approved just prior to his address. Among others, Daniel Horowitz wrote a very depressing but very astute analysis of some of its provisions. In a nutshell, this spending bill (that exists in more that one version, by the way) seems to limit the ability of the President to deter the invasion instead of enhancing it. He got peanuts for the funding (1.375 billion instead of 25) and accepted things such as amnesty, an increase in low-skilled workers, veto powers for local officials, etc. So Trump made his National Emergency address essentially to say that he would seek funds for the wall through some other channels. But that’s not all. On top of that, during his National Emergency address, President Trump missed the point about the invasion. As was cleverly pointed out by Stewart Rhodes of OathKeepers.org, the address failed to underline the military and terrorist dimensions of the invasion, focusing only on the crime and drug aspects of it. Cartels are not only in the business or drug and crime but also active in the fields of terrorism and military operations. With all that in mind, I think it is a sad day for America. It would have been better for the President not to sign the bill at all and simply declare National Emergency. At this point, we don’t even know if there will be a wall at all. In closing, I think we can see now some pattern emerging from the political machinations of both Democrats and establishment Republicans. Washington politicians are doing anything they can to obstruct President Trump. When spending bill negotiations occur, they impose on the President the worst possible conditions and demands. In other terms, they put Trump into a position where he has to give his consent to a lot of crap and poison pills in order to get a little bit of what he wants. That was already obvious in the spending bill last fall that renewed the funding for the military and it is even more obvious now. To shut down the government is better than to sign bills that go against national security. Rosemary Jenks at NumbersUSA gives her take about this recent bill on the air of Secure Freedom Radio just below. I also provide the video of the National Emergency address by the President.

Réunion publique du Président Trump à Harrisburg, 29 avril 2017

Le Président Trump a tenu cette réunion publique pour souligner les 100 jours de son administration et pour honorer sa promesse de boycotter le dîner des correspondants de la Maison-Blanche.

Robert Zubrin comments on the rise of Green Fascism on Secure Freedom Radio

Listen here to Robert Zubrin as he explains the deep foundations of the green movement that makes it, in fact, a fascist ideology. His interview can be heard on segment #3. Then on segment #4, the excellent Gordon Chang brings an update on China.

Robert Zubrin and Gordon Chang on Secure Freedom Radio

Chris Hedges on ‘Brave New World’ and ’1984′

Chris Hedges is a senior fellow at the Nation Institute. Here, he discusses and compares two forms of fascism, one focused on pleasure and another focused rather on surveillance. Welcome to the modern world.

2011_a_brave_new_dystopia_20101227