Je vous suggère ces deux vidéos de Nomos-TV. Dans la première, Philippe Plamondon présente le cas de l’Office québécois de la langue française, qui de toute évidence ne remplit pas son mandat. Montréal s’englicise très rapidement et les Québécois de souche perdent du terrain de plus en plus. Certains disent même que le combat est déjà perdu à Montréal et que les patriotes doivent continuer leur combat de résistance depuis les régions. Dans la deuxième vidéo, Alexandre Cormier-Denis présente le problème de l’ethnicisation de la politique au Québec. En effet, les minorités constituent une part de plus en plus importante de la population. Certaines études font état que les citoyens provenant de la race caucasienne, communément appelés les «Blancs», seront minoritaires d’ici quelques décennies dans l’ensemble des pays occidentaux, avec quelques variations. Dans le cadre de cette confusion multiculturaliste moderne, les «Blancs» sont en train de perdre le contrôle de leurs propres pays au bénéfice d’une immigration du tiers-monde à la peau colorée, dont les valeurs, les coutumes et la religion sont souvent très éloignées des nôtres.
The father of DNA was stripped of honors recently simply because he said IQ differences exist between races. It is a fact proven by all research and studies. Cultural marxists are pushing to replace reality with their rosy-glass vision of an ideal society where everybody would be equal. What they call ‘equality’ never existed in any society. Humans are very different and unequal from one another, not only between races but also between individuals of the same race. If you take an average ethnic group, you will find individuals with IQ ranging in the ’80s while others will score above 130. The same can be said of animals. Among any species you have a large variety, a large diversity I should say, of individuals with their own characteristics in all domains. If you take the example of cats and dogs, you can’t find two cats or dogs that will be perfectly identical. James Watson is the latest victim in a long string of pioneers, scientists, patriots and nationalists who have been rejected, shamed and destroyed on the altar of political correctness and cultural marxism. And it’s not over.
This is Episode 9 of Flashback Friday on Red Ice TV. I want to draw your attention to a specific portion of this show. From 41:38 to 44:18 minutes, hosts Henrik Palmgren and Lana Lokteff present a short extract from a video showing a discussion about science in a South African classroom. What is going there defies imagination. It is certainly very hilarious at times but it is also very worrying. Young South African Blacks display a total disconnection from reality. In psychological terms, they display characteristics of regression. Their inability to recognize science for what it is and their obsession with what they call ‘decolonization’ speak volume. Throughout the world, Blacks are targeted by a massive propaganda effort to make them reject and hate western and White society and all its values and qualities. South Africa and the United States are certainly two of the worst places. But not only that. In that extract, we can also witness the implementation and the enforcing of the ‘safe space’ mentality. One individual who tried to question and debate what the female speaker was saying, was reminded to respect the ‘rules’ of the safe space, to apologize or leave the classroom if he refused to do so. This is a complete totalitarian nightmare. A real safe space should be safe not only for those who speak but for anyone in the audience to ask questions, reflect on things, doubt, debate, etc. In this extract, we can see that this ‘safe space’ was not safe for the young man who interjected with a personal reflection. And when you see that, then you know you live in a totalitarian community or society.
Red Ice TV (a patriotic and nationalist alternative media) published a tweet today saying that their Youtube channel has just received a ‘strike 2’ on some bogus pretext. It will limit their ability to upload for a while. I am under the impression that it probably has to do with the fact that they are very critical of immigration, migration and that they talk a lot about race, gender and diversity in a way that is critical and not passive and submissive. In that context, I would like to suggest to you some of the videos and interviews that they have published in the past months. They have made really good and solid work in the field of race, ethnicity and diversity, from a patriotic and nationalistic point of view. So before their Youtube channel gets definitely terminated (if that happens), I strongly suggest that you take advantage of the great analyses, studies and opinions available here.
Julian Von Abele took the opportunity to defend white and western civilization on a college campus when he was confronted by a crowd of angry leftists. The scene was recorded and posted on Twitter. He stood up for himself, for the white race and for our civilization and we owe him a debt of gratitude. In this interview with Alex Jones, he explains the context of the event and shares his thoughts about it. Thank you, man. You have been terrific. Two thumbs up!
In this episode of Week-End Warrior, Lana and Henrik of Red Ice TV discuss the latest film form Dinesh D’Souza, Death of a Nation. To make things brief, D’Souza tries to sell us the idea that the Democrats were the real Nazis and fascists and that the Democrat Party was the party of slavery, etc. Although this thesis has certain merits, I agree with Lana and Henrik that Dinesh D’Souza twists reality in order to propagandize against the Democrat Party and that is wrong. There were partisans of slavery and of nazism in both parties. But I want to cover another aspect of D’Souza’s view of things that they don’t talk about (not directly). It is the question of White supremacy. Dinesh D’Souza covered the subject of White supremacy in an interview given to Frank Gaffney on the air of Secure Freedom Radio (the audio files are below). During the interview, he explains to Gaffney that fascism and Nazism were left-wing ideologies and that is an argument that can be made if we look at their doctrine. He says that the Left put the blame on the Right for the crimes of Nazism and fascism and that is true. Right-wingers don’t commit mass murder and try to reduce the rights of the citizens. But he fails to see that, in that regard, the so-called White supremacy is a concept that was invented by the same Left to try to portray patriots in a bad light. During the interview, he makes references to figures of the Alt-Right like Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer and says that they are wrong, etc, etc. People in the patriotic and/or nationalist movement are not ‘White supremacists’. They are activists or advocates for the white race. That means that they want the best conditions for the white race, to thrive, to be prosperous, to grow, etc, and there is nothing ‘supremacist’ about that. And that is done not at the expense of others. Every race and ethnic group has the right to be free and live in an environment favorable to its development. Dinesh D’Souza falls into the trap of calling ‘supremacist’ good men and women who simply want to protect us from harm and avoid the catastrophe of totalitarianism. Dinesh D’Souza is trying to have it both ways. He wants the public to believe that those who call right-wingers ‘fascists’ and ‘nazis’ are wrong when they do that, but on the other hand, that they are right when they call certain right-wingers ‘white supremacists’. According to Dinesh D’Souza those so-called ‘White supremacists’ are not really right-wingers. The truth is that they are really right-wingers but they are not White supremacists. They are trying to protect us.
To visit the page of the show on SFR: Interview with Dinesh D’Souza on Death of a Nation
Lana Lokteff responds to accusations that white people would like to mass murder non-whites, while it is the opposite that is true. The current trend shows an increasing danger for the lives and well-being of whites. The case of South Africa, where white farmers are being killed regularly, is certainly the most extreme. But we can see the threat growing in the western world as well as non-whites become increasingly aggressive and impolite toward whites, on top of predatory moves made on their property, their wealth and resources.
In this video, Lana asks her viewers why is that interracial relationships are pushed on white women. Effectively, everywhere in the media we constantly see couples made of a black guy and of a white woman. That translates into the real world as well. Look around you and you will notice these couples everywhere you go. So why is that this type of relationship is pushed on white women? Lana Lokteff gives a lot of good reasons here, like the intention to erase the white race by mixing it with other races. But the main reason she doesn’t mention (not in plain terms) is that this type of relationship is designed to signify to the white man that he has been conquered by the black man. Following the conquest of a territory, men of the victorious tribe always take the women of the conquered ones. It is a constant in history. So, if black males appropriate white females for themselves, leaving white males to be alone or to watch porn, that can only mean that they have, or at least that they consider that they have, conquered our western territory, home of the white men. You see, that type of relationship has nothing to do with love or desire. It is engineered to make the white man feel subdued and conquered by depreciating him before his peers, before the women of his tribe and before himself. Again, unfortunately, that is another thing that we can add to the legacy of Barack Obama. No one in the history of the United States has done more to divide people among themselves.