Poseidon comments on the intentional wrecking of Greece by the globalists, on Red Ice TV

Dalai-Lama: Europe is for Europeans, on Red Ice TV

Lana Lokteff comments on some very wise words by the Dalai-Lama…I wish we had a Pope like that!

Jana on discrimination ethnic Germans face in Germany, on Red Ice TV

Alex Jones comments on the rightful decision by President Trump to bring the troops back

Trump is right to pull the troops from Syria and Afghanistan. The Conservatives are mad about the decision. They are saying that it will leave a vacuum that will be filled by the Russians and the Iranians and that’s probably right, at least in the short term. But I agree with President Trump because in the middle and long term, it is not in our interest to continue these wars in foreign lands. I think we have been had and it all started at the time of the Viet-nam war at a minimum. You see, the people that we call the globalists like to create wars in which they drag the United States. Alex Jones discusses this topic in this video while being on the phone. He is right on the money. The globalists create these phony/fake wars abroad to entrap the Unites States and its allies into fighting them. There, western countries send their best men and women, the youngest, bravest, fittest, strongest and most intelligent of our people. Inevitably, these fine individuals get killed or injured and sometimes their lives are ruined forever. Generation after generation, that makes a lot of people who won’t reproduce and transmit their great qualities to their offspring. Fast-forward to today, we can see now that we have been depleted of what makes a nation great, of its youth, its life and its power. The globalists had one goal that anyone can see here: They wanted to weaken our countries to make them easier targets for invasion and conquest. Anytime the military of a country is deployed in a foreign land, that makes the homeland more vulnerable, as soldiers are no longer there to defend the territory. Combined with the end of mandatory military service and the absence of a second amendment (in a lot of western countries), the effects are dramatic on the national security of any country.

So that was the plan. Attract our soldiers outside the country to be able to invade and conquer it more easily. Is it surprising then that we are being invaded both by Islamist terrorists and by hordes of migrants from the third-world? No it is not. It’s only logical. Trump brings back the troops to allow them to do what they were meant to do: Defend the territory of the United States. The flow of migrants who think they are entitled to everything we have is just beginning. Thankfully, the United States have a President who sees clearly the world as it is. All countries of the world that let their borders wide open for the migrants and refugees will crumble and disappear. By building the wall and maintaining the military inside the territory of the United States (with a few exceptions) this President will be able to save the day and it will be up to the next President to continue with this very wise policy decision.

Lana Lokteff: Why They Want To Replace White People

This video is very well produced and delivered. Take a listen.

The Dalai-Lama: Europe belongs to Europeans…

The Dalai-Lama stated the obvious. Of course, migrants, refugees and a lot of so-called ‘immigrants’ should go back to their home countries once the situation has settled there (the sooner the better). Here is Lana Lokteff of Red Ice TV commenting on the news. This only proves that Buddhists have the heart at the right place. There is a proverb in French that says: «Charité bien ordonnée commence par soi-même», which means that you should always provide for yourself before considering providing for others. There are thousands, millions of people in America and Europe who are desperately in need of medical care and of decent food and housing…and we are welcoming refugees by the millions? A few years ago, I started a series of articles in French under the title Le déploiement de l’axe christo-bouddhique, or in English, the deployment of the Christico-Buddhistic Axis. The idea behind that association, collaboration, alliance, is that these two religions, the two big religions of each side of the planet, are completely compatible, the same way Islam and Communism are compatible. So, if they are compatible, we should work together to fight for a better world and to deter threats to our rights and freedoms. If the association of Communism and Islam is often referred to as the Red-Green Axis, the alliance between the freedom-loving christian West and the Buddhist East could be referred to as the Blue-Orange Axis – orange for the most common color of a monk’s garment. If we don’t pull our strength together, both Christians and Buddhists are going to disappear, be massacred by either communists or Islamists. Europe for Europeans…and the East for those who agree with the Buddha! Here are the four articles in French of the series I was talking about, if you would like to take a look at them.

Le déploiement de l’axe christo-bouddhique ou le rayonnement bleu-orange

Le déploiement de l’axe christo-bouddhique, deuxième partie: Le Bouddha bleu…

Le déploiement de l’axe christo-bouddhique, troisième partie: Jésus aurait été moine bouddhiste…

Le déploiement de l’axe christo-bouddhique, quatrième partie: Le Sanctuaire de Rozabal…

Sweden Special: Election meddling, civil unrest and immigration

In order, Henrik Palmgren of Red Ice TV comments on the recent elections in Sweden where there was evidence of meddling. The second video features Daniel Frandelov, interviewed by Palmgren, commenting on the riots and violence in Sweden, notably in the no-go zones. And third, the documentary ‘Testing Tolerance’ produced by RT covers the situation of massive immigration in Sweden and the problems that it brings.

Soeren Kern on immigration and the future of Europe on SFR

To look at the webpage of the show, please visit: Soeren Kern: EU Refugee and Migrant Influx

A very strong wall with its four layers between the United States and Mexico

The Trump Administration is getting ready to begin the construction of the wall between the United States and Mexico (some might say that a wall between the United States and Canada would be needed as well but that is a subject for another day…). Also, discussions are going on Capitol Hill about certain programs dealing with immigration and refugees such as DACA for example. In this context, I think it is important to have a complete view and understanding about the problem we are facing and the solutions necessary to solve it. There are four layers to the ‘wall’ the way I see it. First, President Trump wants to build a physical structure between the United States and Mexico, to prevent illegal immigration and the flow of drugs. Good. I support the idea. But we have to realize that the problem is more complex than that. The ‘wall’ as to be understood in a larger manner in order to be effective. The very perspicacious and astute Michael Cutler, a former INS agent, has brought to our attention over the years the question of the ports of entry into the United States. In effect, airports, seaports and border crossings are important vectors of illegal immigration and drug trafficking. So, secondly, unless these ports of entry are secured correctly as well in a way that is satisfactory, the wall will remain insufficient to really protect the country. Also non-physical elements such as programs like E-Verify and others can give a hand to secure the United States. Thirdly, the question of cybersecurity remains central in any security strategy. Since a cyber attack can happen anywhere anytime, the construction of a protective wall must be accompanied by a capable, strong, resilient and effective network of cybersecurity protections, methods and safety mesures in order to support the important investment that will be made in the south of the country. Everybody understands that if a strong border wall is built, invaders and criminals will simply look for weaker spots to attack the United States, physical or cyber.

And fourthly, the question of the virtual or psychological wall is important as well. I think it is the great Chinese military general Sun-Tzu that said that wars are won in the minds before being won on the battlefield. Enemies of the western world know that pretty well, I think. Ideologies have a strong impact on people and they pave the way very often for the quiet conquest of territories. Since a couple of years, we have seen the deployment of islamist militants to impose Shariah Law on our populations. Some have used guns to do it, others have used words. The bottom line is that the ideology of Shariah Supremacism has a strength and a power that is a threat to all western countries and nations. A national security strategy must include that in order to be effective and President Trump seems to be inclined to do just that. Also, ideologies are not the only things that fall under the category of the virtual or psychological. Language is a very potent tool of conquest too. Very often the conqueror will try to suppress the use of the language of the conquered, either at work or in the public space. The slow and progressive diminution of the language in use by a people brings with it the disappearance of the people itself speaking it. It is a very effective way to wipe out a whole nation without using guns or bombs.

Which brings me back to the physical wall…The wall between the United States and Mexico will stop the uncontrolled migration to the United States and Canada of people from around the world but especially from South America. In last years, listening to conservative media in the United States, I heard many times that South Americans, referred to currently as latinos, are creating problems in the many businesses where they work in the United States. We are getting reports that they refuse or can’t speak English there. From what I see here in Canada, it is the same thing. As soon as they reach a certain number of Spanish-speaking employees in one enterprise, they stop speaking English (or French in the Province of Quebec) to use Spanish instead. Some might say that in the era of diversity and multiculturalism it is not a problem. I think it is if we understand the real nature of warfare. The imposition of a language on a people brings about the conquest of this people. This problem has metastasized so much in the United States that certain elected officials have begun to talk openly about making English the official language in certain states of the Union if not in the entire country.

The Province of Quebec has been a precursor in these matters. In 1977, the National Assembly adopter Bill 101 to protect the status of the French language in Quebec and make it both the official language of the province itself and the language of the work place. At the time, it was made specifically to protect the population of Quebec from the imposition of English used by Anglo-Canadians or Americans to operate the conquest of the territory. As you can see, times are changing. Now all western nations see their territory being invaded by foreign and hostile populations, sometimes using violence but some other times using stealthy means such as religion or language. So I beg President Trump, in parallel with the construction of the physical wall, to order the preparation of a bill that would make English the official language of the United States. Our countries face an emergency and strong measures must be put in place to save all our nations with their culture, history and civilization. No need to say that it stands to reason that all nations of the western world should do the same and adopt such a law to protect the language of their national population.

To Make America Great Again starts with a strong wall with its four layers. If it works, the United States will have a very very bright future…in English!