William Cooper predicts 9/11 and comments on the Oklahoma City bombing and Osama bin Laden

Here is a series of radio show extracts about William Cooper. Cooper was a conservative, in the true sense of the word. He didn’t want the country of which he was a citizen, to change into something else. He believed that a shift was in preparation that would turn the United States into a socialist country, and that this would pave the way for a One World totalitarian utopian government. On that I disagree with him. The tendency we are witnessing on the earth today is definitely not socialist, but rather fascist. Nevertheless, he was accurate in his prediction of 9/11. 9/11 is the reverse of the 9th of November, 11/9, which is a very important date in nazi mythology.

In this series, he comments on a few elements that, put together, provide a good picture of the situation. First, a CNN reporter was capable of locating and interviewing Osama bin Laden in June 2001, while all the intelligence agencies in the world couldn’t locate him. That sounds impossible to anyone with a brillant mind. He does say that, according to him, this interview is the sign that something bad would happen in the U.S. very soon. He also speaks about the Oklahoma City bombing that couldn’t have been perpetrated by the two twits that were presented to the public. The fact that the attack happened on the eve of Hitler’s birthday, on April 19th, is certainly the indication that it is the Third Reich that is behind it. The fourth extract features a caller who is trying to blame this slow descent into fascism or totalitarianism, on the Jews. Again, that is another person who thinks that the Jews are to be blamed for everything and that they control the media, etc. Cooper tries to make him understand how the culture of corporations works. I am not sure that everything he says is accurate but again it is certainly a better position that trying to smear the Jews.

There is a lot of work to be done about the perceptions, especially on the Jews. It is easier to blame them than to face reality as it is. We are governed by mad men. We are descending back into barbarism, because our leaders have decided that a totalitarian utopian society was better, for them, than a society based on the principles of the Enlightment. That’s our predicament. For now, the best we can do, for those of us who are aware of that, is to protect ourselves and behave with intelligence and judgement. If we can’t save our brothers and sisters, at least maybe we can save ourselves.

Continuer la lecture

Addendum on the piggy-back coups in the Middle East: the Turking Taffy series

To wrap things up on the piggy-back coups in the Middle East, I present to you the Turkish Taffy series by Dave Emory. I explored with you these complicated and highly evolved operations in these earlier posts: Karl RoveLibyaThe Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Qaeda. Make sure to go back and read the information available to refresh your mind before continuing your study. This is not an easy case. Fascism is on the rise on Earth and we must learn the new tricks that the transnationals have found to deceive us. Don’t be fooled: they are always several steps ahead, or so they believe or so they want.

FTR #737

FTR #738

FTR #739 audio

The end of Glenn Beck’s right-wing rampage: Fox News shoots and scores!

Finally, Fox News most popular ranter has been dropped, or should I say, flushed. Right-wing network Fox News’s controversial host will certainly be remembered for his unappropriate comments and most of the times outrageously unacceptable attacks on everything that is liberal, leftist or progressive. But it is his comments on the Democrats in general that will be most remembered and specifically this line: « will we have to shoot them in the head? » Saddly, as we all saw, they appear to have inspired mind-control job Jared Lee Loughner to commit his killing rampage in Tucson, Arizona. In the months just prior to the shooting, Sarah Palin had also the same bad taste to present electoral billboards with targets on it where Democrat representatives were elected, just by coincidence, and that included Arizona.

Beck made the announcement himself on his show Wednesday, April the 6th. Among the many reasons we could find to justify this firing-in-disguise are declining ratings, tense relations between Beck and Fox president Roger Ailes, increasing difficulties to find advertisers ready to present their products during that kind of show, an older audience, etc. But let’s face it, there are more obvious motivations to why he would have been fired. To start with, he decided to expose George Soros for what he was, i.e. a Jewish nazi collaborator in Hungary. And second and most importantly, his calls for the murdering of Democrats. Fox News, even as a right-wing media, can’t live with such a bad publicity. Beck certainly attracts good ratings, he is popular, o.k. But there are limits to everything. When he made those calls to the murdering of Democrats, combined with George Soros’s reaction to his public exposure as a nazi collaborator, that was it. It was too much.

In the end, Beck is lucky to have had the opportunity to work in the United States. In Canada, after publicly saying that people should fire in the head members of a certain political party, a tv host would have been sent packing right away. Nobody would have been able to keep his job here. But in the United States, where fascism is much more advanced than in Canada, in principle at least, somebody can be a complete asshole and show absolutely no form of respect to anyone and get away with it. Well, Beck got away with it but only for a while. From now on, he will make other things, hopefully far away from progressives and liberals. As well, I am proposing the video where he announces that he will leave the network. What is most curious is that when you listen to him, you almost believe him. So either he is sincere in his crazyness or he is a goddamn good actor.

07beck.html

Globe and Mail

Gulf of Mexico oil spill: the environmental Reichstag fire of the century…or just a plain example of pure greed?

© Madmaxer | Dreamstime.com

Deep waters are on the horizon for humans. Many things can be said about the BP oil rig that blew out. The fact that the « accident » happened on Hitler’s birthday, April 20th, gave it a bad smell to begin with, so to speak. Also, the gravity of the explosion was so important that it was impossible not to imagine either a conspiracy or a case of gross negligence. First, there is the question of whether or not the cement installation of the well was properly executed. Apparently, over a period of 14 years, 18 out of 39 wells blew out in the Gulf of Mexico due to incorrect cementing installation. That particular rig is just one among many. However, there is another reason that might have provoked the explosion. The fact is that a BP executive and a Transocean official were arguing in the morning of the accident about the safety of removing heavy mud to replace it by seawater. Heavy mud serves precisely to keep the pressure down to avoid oil from leaking up the pipe. So, to accelerate drilling and to save costs, the BP executive imposed the decision on Transocean’s managers and workers to their upmost consternation and concern. During the day, workers on the rig were getting more and more nervous as the rig experienced all kinds of strange kickbacks. A few hours later, the rig exploded and 11 workers died.

Then, as if it was not already enough, James Patrick Black, the BP executive put in charge of the cleaning of the Gulf Coast, died mysteriously in a plane crash in November 2010. Considering the consequences and the responsibility that BP would have to face eventually, one cannot but wonders if it isn’t some kind of unfortunate accident and what are the real facts that Black may have uncovered during his brief assignment.

The Justice Department is hesitating between two scenarios in its prosecution of BP: negligence or gross negligence, which sums itself to criminal conduct. If that second scenario is retained, fines could go up to 21 billion dollars. Can you imagine that? To save a few millions in drilling costs, BP could pay up to 21 billion dollars, plus some additional money for lawsuits, settlements with the families, clean-up costs, etc!

And there’s even more to it. Here is an excerpt from the second article of the Globe and Mail:

« According to an ongoing lawsuit in Houston, Kevin Lacy, BP’s former senior vice-president for drilling operations for the Gulf of Mexico, reached a mutual agreement with the company to resign in December of 2009 because Mr. Lacy believed the company was not adequately committed to improving safety protocols in offshore drilling operations to the level of its industry peers.

The suit said Mr. Lacy, an experienced drilling engineer who had implemented a rigorous drilling safety program while at Chevron, had been recruited to join BP in 2007 to improve and standardize its drilling policies and protocols. »

What do you think of that? BP hires someone to improve its safety measures and the person in question has to resign because BP doesn’t seem that much interested after all by safety and security. Strange? The more I look into this case, the more I am puzzled by the conduct of humans. To save a few millions and some time, a multinational corporation is ready to jeopardize its reputation, its capability to stay in business, the people who work for and around it and the whole environment in which the very executives of that corporation live and thrive? Decidedly, I don’t understand humans. Please, someone, come to my rescue. With these kinds of people in charge of the Earth, it is no big surprise that things are going so bad. We are governed by crooks, nutcases and psychopaths. Anyhow, I have also attached the video of the interview that survivors of the oil rig explosion gave to Anderson Cooper. It is worth watching because you can see that it is real. Some executives at BP have played with the workers lives and with the health and food of the whole planet, for a few bucks.

trouble-on-oiled-waters-halliburton-bp-bush-cheney-and-blair

trouble-on-oiled-waters-pt-2

bp-executive-in-charge-of-gulf-clean-up-killed-in-plane-crash

Globe and Mail

Globe and Mail – Manslaughter charges

Encore une autre fatigante, prise 2: lorsque la ségrégation des hommes a bon ton

© Skumar2008 | Dreamstime.com

Bon, ça y est…encore une autre fatigante. On est a pas assez de toutes ces hystériques qui réclament que les jupes soient plus longues, que les décolletés soient moins plongeants, que les bas soient moins sexy, etc, etc, etc, qu’il faut en plus se faire achaler par des pro-égalité? Et oui. Les grandes tenantes du féminisme, cette idéologie prônant « l’égalité » i.e. donner des avantages et des traitements de faveur aux femmes quand cela fait leur affaire, eh bien ces tenantes n’en démordent pas: il n’est pas question que les hommes dans l’enseignement puissent avoir leur chance, non! Écoutez ici Chantal Locat, responsable du comité de la condition des femmes à la CSQ. Soit dit en passant, comme l’a fait remarquer Dutrizac lors de son entrevue avec Locat, il n’y en a pas de comité de la condition des hommes à la CSQ, parce que les hommes au Québec, ce n’est pas important.

Toujours est-il que dans une lettre publiée dans La Presse du 29 mars 2011, Madame Locat s’en prend à Égide Royer, spécialiste en éducation. Pourtant, s’il y a quelqu’un de sensible, d’intelligent, de posé et de mature dans ses réflexions sur l’éducation, c’est bien Égide Royer. Mais…voyez-vous…Royer a un défaut: il essai d’aider les hommes. Et ça, c’est un péché au Québec. Cette Belle Province, qui est la deuxième plage la plus dorée du féminisme après la Norvège, est un paradis artificiel dans lequel les féministes s’enivrent jusqu’à l’inconscience depuis plus de quarante ans. Le féminisme est une idéologie totalitaire qu’il faut combattre comme toutes les autres idéologies. Et le Québec, malheureusement, a été noyauté et neutralisé par cette mafia féministe qui n’en a rien à foutre du bien-être des hommes et nous en avons un cas clair ici.

Je dois dire que, en tant que lecteur et écrivain, je trouve la lettre de Locat difficile à suivre et plutôt mal écrite. Il y a trop d’idées qui se bousculent et on suit mal sa pensée. Ensuite, elle nous livre des statistiques qu’elle sort d’on ne sait où et, évidemment, elle ne mentionne pas les statistiques qui pourraient contredire son propos. Son attaque contre Égide Royer est déplacée et manque de jugement mais tout à fait révélatrice du fond inconscient féministe: les hommes sont des salopards qu’il faut mater et ceux qui osent parler devront être ramenés à l’ordre. Malheureusement pour Royer, on dirait que madame Locat a décidé d’en faire un « exemple ».

C’est drôle. Les féministes ont prôné la discrimination positive pour aider les femmes à faire des « gains » sociaux. Mais le retour d’ascenseur ne se fait pas. Lorsque Royer propose d’appliquer le principe de discrimination positive pour aider des hommes à accéder à l’enseignement, alors là, ça ne marche plus. Quel autre signe avez-vous besoin pour comprendre que le féminisme est une idéologie? Cela ne peut pas être plus clair. Même la ministre Beauchamp lors de l’entrevue avec Dutrizac, que vous trouverez ici en deuxième place, a hésité à appuyer l’idée de la discrimination positive favorisant les hommes en enseignement en disant qu’elle préférerait « avoir les personnes les plus compétentes en avant ». C’est curieux, quand il était question de faire de la discrimination positive en faveur des femmes, est-ce que l’on s’en souciait d’avoir les personnes les plus compétentes? On dirait que non, soit dit en passant, si je regarde par exemple l’efficacité des forces policières depuis que les femmes y ont fait leur entrée en masse. Et il y a d’autres exemples.

Au fond, le féminisme est une idéologie suprémaciste. Les féministes combattent l’idée que les hommes sont supérieurs parce qu’elles croient que ce sont les femmes qui sont supérieures. Vous vous souvenez de la consigne traditionnelle d’évacuer les femmes et les enfants d’abord lors d’un naufrage? Et avez-vous déjà vu des manifestations, des « marches », pour protester contre cette « discrimination », ce « sexisme » en faveur des femmes et contre les hommes? Eh bien, vous n’en verrez pas. Les féministes prônent « l’égalité » quand les femmes n’ont pas le haut du pavé dans telle situation mais elles sont tout à fait capables de négocier avec des cas clairs de discrimination lorsque cela avantage ces dernières. Je vous offre la lettre de Locat, ainsi que les entrevues de Locat, Beauchamp ainsi que la tribune téléphonique qui a suivi. Je vous en supplie, ne mordez pas dans la pomme tentatrice du féminisme.

Lettre de Chantal Locat

Chantal Locat

Line Beauchamp

Tribune téléphonique

La Gestapo de l’allaitement: une autre grande réussite du Québec soviétique

Benoit Dutrizac a encore frappé dans le mille. Après avoir soulevé avec justesse la gestapoïsation de la sécurité aérienne en Amérique du Nord, voilà maintenant qu’il récidive en révélant un autre grand exemple de pensée totalitaire à voir le jour au Québec: la Gestapo de l’allaitement. La Ligue La Leche a vu le jour dans les années ’50 aux États-Unis dans le but d’aider les mères à allaiter. Le groupe a maintenant des succursales dans plusieurs pays dont le Canada et le Québec. Jusque-là pas de problème. Ce qui a mis le feu aux poudres de Benoit Dutrizac, c’est qu’il a reçu une lettre d’un auditeur lui relatant l’expérience douloureuse que sa conjointe a vécu lors de l’accouchement de leur dernier bébé. Dutrizac a interviewé l’auditeur en question.

Voyez-vous, la situation est la suivante. La Ligue La Leche, loin de se contenter d’être un groupe qui fournit de l’information et des services aux mères désirant allaiter, a maintenant envahi le territoire des hôpitaux du Québec. Apparemment, selon les témoignages recueillis lors de la tribune téléphonique qui a suivi l’entrevue avec l’auditeur et que je vous présente également, les partisans de cette philosophie sont assez insistants au point où cela en devient totalement indécent, intolérable et inacceptable. Écoutez l’entrevue avec Pascal, le père du nouveau-né. C’est à glacer le sang tellement on est fou au Québec d’avoir laissé des fascistes de la sorte prendre le contrôle des salles d’accouchement pour littéralement tyranniser les mères. Il me semble que cela ne prend pas un doctorat en sciences de la santé pour comprendre qu’après un accouchement, qui se rapproche à peu près d’une crucifixion au niveau des douleurs et de la fatigue, on laisse la mère tranquille…

Comment cela se fait-il qu’au Québec ce soient maintenant les hommes qui prennent la défense des femmes? On l’a vu dernièrement dans le cadre du dossier dans la burqa dans les garderies, les hommes montent au front pour défendre les femmes parce que celles-ci, brainwashées et contrôlées par des idées totalitaires, comme le féminisme, le socialisme et autres, ne le font plus quand cela compte. Dutrizac, un homme, nous révèle cette histoire dont, personnellement, je n’étais pas au courant non plus. Peut-être est-ce en raison du bolchévisme soviétique avec lequel nous nous saoulons depuis les années soixante qu’une telle situation soit possible. C’est bien normal, dans un régime totalitaire, le jugement et le discernement ne sont pas de mise. Ce qui compte, c’est la norme qui est donné par l’État. Les mères et les individus en général, on s’en fout. Remarquez que la Ligue La Leche a des appuis de tailles comme l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé et UNICEF. On dirait que c’est une nouvelle tentacule du gouvernement mondial après la Banque mondiale, l’ONU, l’OMS, etc, pour contrôler les mères en leur « montrant » comment allaiter leurs bébés… Je rappelerais ici que les femmes ont depuis toujours allaité leurs bébés, comme les femelles de toutes autres espèces de mammifères. Elles n’ont pas attendu que la Ligue La Leche fasse sont apparition.

Franchement, cela pue le fascisme à plein nez. Dans le fond la Ligue La Leche, c’est à l’allaitement ce que Greenpeace est à l’environnement, i.e. un groupe d’extrémistes prêts à faire du terrorisme socialement plus acceptable que de poser des bombes pour faire passer leur point. C’est encore une autre arnaque pour nous priver de notre libre pensée et de notre discernement. Le gouvernement devrait sortir ces fascistes des hôpitaux avant que les mères se ramassent avec des traumatismes post-accouchement. Et pour les pères, la chose la plus simple est celle-ci: après une minute ou deux d’essai infructueux pour allaiter, vous mettez les Lécheux dehors de la chambre. C’est votre femme qui accouche, pas elles. Si elles appellent la sécurité et que celle-ci vous sort de l’hôpital, vous pourrez toujours déposer une plainte contre les Lécheux pour harcèlement et voie de fait sur votre conjointe et contre l’hôpital pour atteinte à vos droits parentaux. Je crois que cela serait la bonne attitude à adopter avec ces Lécheux fascistes: prenez garde sinon on vous poursuit. Quelques millions plus tard en dommages et intérêts, ça pourrait refroidir leurs ardeurs. Qu’ils prennent donc un lait glacé à ma santé, dans une bouteille.

La Leche League

Entrevue avec Pascal

Tribune téléphonique

The 50-Point Manifesto of Hasan al-Banna: where catholic bigotry meets Soviet Russia and Mussolini’s Corporate State

Here is the link to a page on Pointdebascule website where the 50-Point Manifesto of Hasan al-Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, is presented. Jesus-Christ that it must be boring to live in such a society! No gambling, no nightclubs, no alcohol, no drugs, no prostitution…but can we still eat, just to be sure? Everybody has to wear the same uniform, there is only one political party, women and men are being separated in schools and in other activities… With the Muslim Brotherhood, we are witnessing the birth and expansion of probably the worst ideology that the world has ever conceived. In effect, it combines the worst elements of ideologies of the past. The islamic bigotry that is apparent here is  only too reminiscent of catholic bigotry that was rampant before WWII. In Quebec for example, we had our shares of that crap, believe me. These elements of islamic bigotry merge, in Hasan al-Banna’s doctrine, with means of social control typical of soviet Russia for finally transfiguring themselves in a corporate state philosophy that would have given Mussolini his best orgasms. Frankly, the way things are going, we are pretty much screwed. If western leaders really think they are doing us and themselves a big favor in toppling Middle East dictators in the wake of the so-called « democratic » revolutions, they must stand corrected. Western leaders and éminences grises are in fact paving the way for a major regression into Antiquity. Today’s Middle East leaders were acting, until recently, as safety valves against all kinds of barbaric social tendencies and groups, which were encouraged by Islamism and terrorism. Now that they are being overthrown, nothing stands in the way anymore of Islamists, terrorists or groups of barbarians to impose their views on pro-democratic populations. To read how I assess the situation in Libya, see my earlier post.

I am suggesting as well Dave Emory’s last show, FTR #736, which continues the analysis on the coup d’état that was perpetrated in Egypt. Bring your attention more specifically, among other elements, on section 2c where an exerpt of  John Roy Carlson’s Cairo to Damascus is presented that shows what are the real « values »  of the Brotherhood. As well, here is Dave Emory‘s latest blog entry analyzing the results of a recent election exercice in Egypt and how in such occasion the Muslim Brotherhood has prevailed against pro-democratic forces of the youth. With all these elements of information, I don’t see how one still could think that the Brotherhood is benevolent.

Sexual repression feminism style: welcome to Pink Fascism

© Skumar2008 | Dreamstime.com

This never-ending quest for « equality » and stop of sexual « exploitation » of women has made another victim this week. The Vancouver Whitecaps Football Club, that will make its debut in the Major League Soccer on saturday 19th, have launched an advertisement video in which a beautiful and young female is seen wearing a body-paint. Look at the video for yourself. There is nothing there, except for a little nudity. And it is not even full nudity nor a real body-paint as we can see the model wearing a bra and panties. Nevertheless, it was to be expected that somebody in the feminist community would try to make a « case » out of it, jumping on the occasion to raise the holy sword of women’s rights and testosterone bashing. Anne Giardini, a local Vancouver forestry executive and novelist, complained to the Whitecaps Football Club and to Bell Canada Enterprises, one of its partners, as we can see the Bell logo on the model’s chest. Giardini, to make her case, points out among other things that her 16-year-old daughter who plays soccer doesn’t look like that at all.

I am asking you folks, when will that complaining ever end? While the human race regresses into barbarism and that the whole world is going to annihilation, crashing down under the heavy-weight pressures and attacks of the International Fascist, some women are losing their time and are making us lose ours on such trivial and stupid things. Don’t they have anything else to say and do than worrying about body-painted women in ads? Frankly, there are things much more important in our world than protecting their sensitive eyes from sexy girls…

I am talking to you, feminists. Why don’t you attack women wearing burqas or hijabs and the men who encourage them to do so, instead? That would certainly be more logical and efficient. If there is anything that is a symbol of women’s exploitation, it is the burqa, the hijab, not the body-paint. And I have another question for you. If your daughter is the victim of incest, what do you do to protect her from that harm? Feminism has gone very far in defending women’s rights but has completely forgotten to do the basics. Defending women’s rights starts in your own home. If you can’t or won’t protect your own daughters from sexual exploitation, what are you trying to achieve here by « denouncing » sexual exploitation, sexy fashion, nudity or pornography? Start with you own life, we’ll see then what happens.

article1943550

Republicans strengthen right-wing Jihad against the poor, leftists, liberals and anyone who don’t think like them

Well, well, well… Look at what we got here… These days, in Wisconsin, there is literally a vendetta against unions to finish off any capacity from the poorest segment of the population of our so-called « democratic » countries to organize and defend themselves against the sharks and wolves of the ultra-rich. Many Republicans perceive unions as being « socialist ». Really? But… haven’t they read the Gospel, where Jesus is presented as somebody who shares with, gives and help his brothers? How this sacred Jihad against unions is in any way compatible with the most basic principles of social-democracy, liberalism, which is based on the Gospel? It is not. And you know why? Because it is just another deception, a mascarade to hide the pro-fascist agenda of the Republican Party. Republicans want to destroy the middle class and with it, social-democracy itself. That‘s what they are trying to do.

You want another example? Take this story about Ron Schiller, Foundation President at the National Public Radio network. It appears that he has been set up by a right-wing activist, James O’Keefe, a specialist of these matters apparently who, among other targets, helped to destroy the credibility of ACORN. O’Keefe sent two of his accomplices, Shaughn Adeleye and Simon Templar (we can bet that is not his real name either…) to pose as members of a phony Muslim Brotherhood front group, the Muslim Education Action Center. During this highly edited interview, we can hear and see Schiller, among other things, making negative comments on the Tea Party and the Republican Party. O’Keefe then posted the hidden-camera video on Youtube, which led to a media scandal and the firing of chief executive Vivian Schiller, no relation with the other. Evidently, taken out of context, the different comments Schiller made sound rather unacceptable for an executive. But O’Keefe hasn’t provided us yet with the unedited version of the interview, which I guess would be revealing. But I think we can assume that we will never have the chance to see the integral of the recording…

NPR is getting accustomed to conservative harassment. In the 1990s and in 2005, similar attempts were made on them. These recent attacks are part of a global strategy from the Republicans to cut off on « federal spending », which is only a pretext to cease all kinds of social measures and programs that help the poor and the middle class in the U.S. Last month, a bill was passed in the House of Representatives that would end funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports NPR. Frankly, this O’Keefe is a manipulator and a right-wing biggot. I provide you here with an article and the videos that O’Keefe made available on Youtube on this story. In the first one, you will be able to judge for yourself how edited it is and how it cannot have any credibility whatsoever for that reason. Not knowing the general context in which these comments were made, one cannot induce an interpretation like O’Keefe does. But it doesn’t matter for the Republican Party. They are after the poor and the middle class and they are ready to crush everyone on their path.

article1936138

LGBT & Anarchists attack Christians in Sweden

Is it just me or maybe you, the Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals and Transgendered haven’t understood at all the modern social contract of our society? Well, let me explain it to you. The deal, at least applied to your situation, is that society will accept your sexual orientations. In counterpart, you must behave in a way that is respectfull of others, which is clearly not the case here in this video. What is the problem with you? The western world is the only society that accepts other sexual orientations than heterosexuality and you display these aggressive behaviors? Can I suggest to you that you move your manifestations to the ambassies of certain Muslim countries, such as Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Pakistan, Yemen? We’ll see then if you have the same « courage » that you display here. It is always easy to attack Christians because they are an easy target. It doesn’t hurt. Frankly, I think you are cowards, not because of your sexual orientations but rather because of your behavior. You could at least have chosen a bigger target, such as these countries where homosexuals are put to death, sometimes solely on the basis that they are homosexuals. Honestly, you are a pity.

Also, I would add that these supposedly « anarchists » are in fact probably poor useful fools manipulated by the Right to destabilize western society. In Sweden, were highly questionable Karl Rove is the personal eminence grise of the Prime Minister, big financier fascist Carl Lundstrom has been working in the dark for many years to further the Third Reich agenda, as it was shown in some of Dave Emory’s past shows, FTR #724, FTR #725 and FTR #732. So it comes as no surprise if such behaviors and demonstrations take place in a country that is such a paradise for fascism.