Fascism and gun control: What you don’t know

This lecture by Dave Emory takes a look at a phenomenon that has taken place around the world, and here at home as well in the U.S. and in Canada. The whole issue about gun control appears to be a gimmick conceived by pro-fascist elements of the intelligence community in order to suscitate a reaction against gun control itself, thus creating a tension in the population between partisans of gun control and people who oppose it. If it eventually passes into a law, it has the advantage of disarming the people, rendering them susceptible to surrender to a coup d’état of some kind. In the event of such coup d’état, bunch of thugs belonging to the extreme-right type, such as neo-nazis, would be deputized, i.e. transformed into agents of law and order, such as the Freikorps or Brownshirts were in pre-war nazi Germany. Nazi Germany passed a gun control legislation in 1938, just before the war, so Jews, liberals and dissidents couldn’t defend themselves against these thugs who were sent to round them up. Also, it appears that the gun control legislation that was passed in the U.S. in 1968 copy-pasted to a large extent the German law of 1938.

An argument that is made pretty often to justify gun control is that guns kill people, so by reducing the number of guns and their accessibility, a society then reduces statistics on murders. Well, if you think about it carefully, that’s stupid. A gun by itself has never killed anyone. It is humans who kill. Nothing will ever happen until a human being takes the gun and shoots. Dave Emory brings (at the time of the lecture, in the ’90s) a very important statistic concerning Switzerland. Although the country had a very high proportion of citizens who possessed a weapon, the crime and murder rates were among the lowest in the world. You see? That’s the opposite of what the propaganda says. A disarmed population has a much higher chance of being subject to crime and agression if they can’t defend themselves. Emory goes on to say that everyone in Switzerland had to do some time in the army…and that they brought their weapon with them when they got out of it, with full rounds of amunitions. The concept that is being defended here is that every citizen in Switzerland is considered to be a member of the army and as such, is susceptible to be called to defend the country in case of a coup or agression. According to you, what would happen to bunches of Brownshirts who would try to round up these citizens? They would receive a bullet between the eyes. That’s why everybody keep quiet in that country. In the end, what is important to remember, is the fact that an armed population favor the decrease of the crime rate, not the other way around. I am particularly glad that the Conservative government here in Canada is willing to abolish the long-gun registry. In case of a coup d’état, the population needs to be able to defend themselves.

And in Norway, people there should not let themselves be disturbed, distracted and influenced by the mass-killings that have happened recently. What is important is the well-being of the community in the long run. Being aware that Breivik is probably an agent of these same pro-fascist elements of the intelligence community that Emory describes in this lecture, the population has to keep the focus on what is good for them and not let themselves be carried away by their emotions. Judgement and discernement are always essential.

L-4 Fascism, Gun Control and the Intelligence Community

Michel Juneau-Katsuya, ancien chef du SCRS, en entrevue à Benoît Dutrizac

Un dossier présenté par Pierre-André Normandin dans La Presse du 4 août 2011 fait état d’une conversation compromettante tenue en 2000 entre Adil Charkaoui et Abousfian Abdelrazik ayant eu pour objet le plan de faire sauter un avion entre Montréal et Paris. Benoît Dutrizac s’entretient avec le journaliste ici en première partie. En deuxième partie du segment audio, l’ancien chef du SCRS, Michel Juneau-Katsuya, intervient sur le sujet. La conversation est intéressante car elle touche plusieurs choses importantes. Je ne vais pas vous les énumérer point par point. Je vous propose de l’écouter, ce sera mieux. Je vais plutôt concentrer mon commentaire sur un point précis que voici. Quelques minutes après le début de la conversation, Juneau-Katsuya fait remarquer à l’animateur que le Canada est relativement juvénile en ce qui concerne la gestion du terrorisme, et le cas Charkaoui-Abdelrazik est éloquent. Or, j’aimerais renchérir sur ce propos. Disons les choses telles qu’elles sont, le Canada souffre d’infantilisme, d’immaturité et de naïveté en ce qui concerne le domaine du renseignement et de la sécurité, et pour une raison fort simple. En effet, le Canada ayant bénéficié de la protection des États-Unis après la Deuxième Guerre Mondiale et de celle de la Grande-Bretagne jusqu’à celle-ci, l’intelligentsia politique et stratégique canadienne a eu tendance, je crois, à se déresponsabiliser de cette sphère de la gestion des affaires de l’état. Concrètement, ce qui se passait sur le terrain, c’est que le Canada laissait aux États-Unis le soin de s’acquitter des sales besognes, parfois dégueulasses, à accomplir pour assurer la sécurité des citoyens de l’Amérique du Nord. Le problème, c’est que pendant tout ce temps, le Canada n’a pas développé sa propre expertise dans le domaine du renseignement. En se fiant trop sur les Américains, les Canadiens ont oublié qu’ils vivaient dans un pays souverain qui doit gérer ses affaires lui-même.

Aussi, et ceux qui sont des habitués de ce blog me voient venir, la situation politique aux États-Unis est inquiétante, tout le monde le sait. Selon mon évaluation personnelle et selon les différents signes et indices qui se manifestent au sud de la frontière, je m’attends à un effondrement des États-Unis dans les dix prochaines années. Et ceci veux dire une chose très claire pour les Canadiens en termes de renseignement: nous sommes dans la merde. N’ayant jamais assumé nos responsabilités dans ce domaine ni durant le « protectorat » britannique ni depuis que ce sont les Américains qui s’en chargent, nous allons nous retrouver comme des gamins pris au beau milieu d’une bande de mafieux, malfrats, enragés et fiers-à-bras. En effet, certains pays qui se retiennent d’essayer de venir piller nos ressources naturelles (sans notre consentement…) et s’emparer de notre territoire par la force parce que les Américains sont là, eh bien ils n’auront plus cette gêne dès lors que les États-Unis n’existeront plus et que les républiques autonomes qui en résulteront vont s’entre-déchirer entre elles pour des parcelles de territoires et pour le contrôle des ressources.

En clair, voici la situation. Le Canada dispose d’une fenêtre d’environ dix ans pour arriver à maturité sur le plan du renseignement et de la sécurité. Après, il sera trop tard. Il faut faire vite. Monsieur Juneau-Katsuya me semble un type bien qui a un bon jugement. Je crois que cela n’est vraiment pas le temps de laisser partir à la retraite des gens d’expérience comme cela, il faut les retenir. Aussi, je crois que nous n’aurons pas le choix d’aller chercher des gens de l’extérieur de pays pour nous aider à combler ce déficit dans le domaine du renseignement. Le Canada entretient des bonnes relations avec, en plus des États-Unis, Israel, la Grande-Bretagne et d’autres. Il y a sûrement des gens d’expérience dans ces pays qui peuvent venir se greffer à nos unités de renseignement.

Dix ans…pour combler un déficit de plusieurs décennies. Je sais que cela a l’air énorme mais on a pas le choix de toute façon.

P-A Normandin et Juneau-Katsuya

A scenario for WWIII: Israel, the EU and the United States

You think that the world is going just right ? Well, think again. This world is going right to the brink, sliding little by little, notch per notch, toward Armageddon. Obviously, if we are ever going to engage into a new world war, it won’t be the progressives’s fault, nor the liberals’s, nor the democrats’s. It will be the fault of all the totalitarian stooges and agents that are way too numerous out there in the open. It will be because of their machinations, manipulations, misdeeds to deliberately sabotage liberal democracy that we will face ourselves with a world that will have crumbled from within into total collapse. We may very well be the last humans of history to experience what is called democracy. It has been invented during the Enlightenment, so it can disappear, it is not eternal, especially if we don’t do anything to protect it.

You may wonder where I am going with this. Well, follow my train of thought. If you have been observant of the international scene, with its political, economical and geo-strategical dimensions, you must have noticed that certain signs are present that lead to conclude that big changes are on the way. Nothing is permanent. We have seen it during history many times. States and Empires only last for a time, inevitably they all end up collapsing one day or another. It is just a question of time. In recent years, many events have sent us clues to gather and analyse. Among other elements, we can mention 9/11, the creation of the Euro Zone and the European Union, the rise of Islam, tensions and conflicts continuing to increase within the United States, the rise of China’s economic power, the desire for a greater variety of sources of energy and for healthier food and medecine, water becoming more important as a natural resource, important migration of populations, the number of cars reaching the numbers of humans on Earth, pollution problems, etc. This list is not exhaustive.

Here is what I see in these events for the future. Very soon, a combination of three things will undoubtably unleash the dogs of WWIII. First, a series of Arab countries will declare war on Israel over the pretext of the question of Palestine. Around the same time or a little later, civil war will begin in Europe, due to the high level of social tensions caused by the Euro Zone and the European Union that have been custom-built to benefit Germany, and by Muslim immigration that refuse to integrate into european society. And finally, the United States, once the greatest democracy in the world, will collapse in shame, breaking into smaller republics, becoming the Balkans of North America. Each one of these new republics will have its own agenda, political regime and ideology, sometimes ready to join the Canadian Federation but sometimes not. In certain cases they will embrace fascism to become corporate states and some other times they will try to continue clinging to the notion of liberal democracy. I continue to think that Vermont and Maine are made for being Canadian provinces. If Canada collapses as well into smaller entities, they would fit perfectly into a new larger state composed of Quebec, New Brunswick and the states of New England. Can you imagine all Franco-Americans and French-Canadians of the North-East in the same state? That would be cool.

Listen to me folks. This is not necessarily what I wish for but rather what the signs are telling me concerning the future. There will be a lot of people that will wake up in astonishment and bewilderment when it all starts. In my case, I will be ready to continue the fight even harder for democracy, because I am already aware of the big game that is being played. While the masses will still be into the stages of trying to come out of their sleep and get awake, I will be a warrior for our great civilization made out of Greco-Roman culture, Judeo-Christian moral values, Enlightenment philosophical principles, liberal democratic political ideology, and secularist social and civil organization. If the world has any chance of survival, it is with that program. Any totalitarian utopia will inevitably fail, for the simple reason that humans are fallible. Totalitarian regimes need perfect people to make it work. As it can’t find any, it governs through force using terror and torture to discourage dissent, resistance and revolution. Totalitarians seek to build a glass castle. However, as soon as somebody drops something, the whole building breaks into pieces.

The TransCanada Corp Keystone XL expansion: personal tragedies and human suffering through civilization changes

This National Post article about a Nebraska rancher opposed to the passing of the Keystone Pipeline XL expansion on his land is revelatory. Randy Thompson, a cattle buyer, is fighting to avoid a foreign company, TransCanada Corp, from bringing its pipeline on his land. I am saying revelatory because similar situations have happened on thousands of different occasions in the past. Everytime a new empire sets foot, or a new civilization takes roots, or an old one dies, we see good and decent people being caught in the implosion, explosion or redefining of the old ways to set the path for the new ones. People like Mr Thompson who have been forced to relocalize or cede a part of their land, by persuasion or by force, have been millions throughout history. Whether we talk about the Roman Empire conquering the world, the French Revolution cutting a few strategic heads, the armies of Muhammad conquering North Africa or the American colonies declaring their independence, in these occurences, there were always people who, even though they hadn’t done anything wrong, were caught in the processes of change to their detriment. That’s the way I see what is happening to Mr Thompson.

The Anglo-American Empire is under attack by the forces of the Third Reich that have gone underground after WWII, and they are more alive than ever. In effect, they have veiled their activities in all kinds of cloaks, such as the Green movement, social activism of all sorts, counter-culture activities, religious cults, religions per se, and sometimes intelligence agencies and other governmental, military and international organizations that they have infiltrated and co-opted to implement and push forward their agenda. Furthermore, the Anglo-American Empire is under attack as well by the most reactionary people that you can find on the surface of this Earth, the Arab/Islamic world that has been, since WWII, contaminated by nazism due to the collaboration of Hasan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, with Adolf Hitler. This world, driven by the morals of Sharia, proposes of bringing the world back to what it was in 7th century A.D. Clearly, we can’t go back to that era, simply because of the most basic rule of human history: to always look forward. These reactionary elements that we find in the Arab world, in Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and other states of the Gulf, are basically 7th century Bedouins…with billions of petro-dollars in their pockets…which makes them extremely dangerous. Contrary to westerners, these Bedouins have not worked to get their wealth. They were only lucky enough to be the nomads walking the country when the gasoline engine was invented and that oil became something important. Continuer la lecture

The Great Lakes – St. Lawrence Region Summit: A region of terrific opportunities…for all kinds of folks

On June 13th 2011, the National Post published the first in a five-part series on the future of the Great Lakes region in advance of a North American summit on the subject. The Mowat Centre and Brookings Institution will hold the « Great Lakes – St. Lawrence Region Summit » on June 21st-22nd in Windsor and in Detroit. Many speakers will be heard from all over the areas concerned, i.e. two provinces, Quebec and Ontario, and 8 American states. The point of holding this conference is that there is a growing awareness in the business and political communities that regions are becoming more and more important around the world because of geographical « clustering » of populations, capital, talent, education centers, private research centers, culture centers, etc, that go beyond official borders. Since a couple of years, new industries have come to replace traditional heavy industry in the region of the Great Lakes, which is a sign that it can only grow up again after a certain period of decrease in the last decades. Canadians and Americans share the area of the Great Lakes and St-Lawrence as a land mass to live on, to prosper, to do business, and basically to be happy and enjoy freedom and democracy. The authors of the article, Matthew Mendelsohn and John Austin, recall that in 2050, 1/3 of the world’s population will live with a short supply of water, which makes the Great Lakes and St-Lawrence region a little treasure to be cherished for the future of our children, and even for us. Skipping down in the article, they mention that apparently, we have « an inability to imagine our shared future » on both sides of the border. It is probably true.

I knew it was coming. In George Orwell’s 1984, whole continents are considered regions and the world is united in a totalitarian fascist-socialist regime. After the marriage of a bunch of european countries to form the European Union, now we can already see certain movements beginning the same process in North America. The summit that will be held this week is a good idea but I think it is the symptom of something else. A political event drew my attention recently. In three U.S. states that are concerned with the Great Lakes issue, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin, moves have been made to attack the middle class and the unions, among other things. For example, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder has made some questionable manoeuvres in the last weeks concerning the future of his state. The next paragraph is an extract of an earlier post, on the seastedding movement:

Continuer la lecture

Update on Green Fascism in the National Post: The tar sands agenda and other subjects

© Oystein Sando | Dreamstime.com

Last week, the National Post published a series of articles related to what I call Green Fascism. Under the file name « Junk Science Week », these articles try to expose anti-capitalist propaganda that proliferates under the cover of the defense of the environment. If sometimes bogus science can be used to deny good and sound research or facts, on the other hand, it can be used as well to push forward phony « research » and « discoveries » with a clear agenda. The Third Reich is more alive than ever. The Green movement being one of his spearheads, it pushes forward a propaganda rhetoric aimed at the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom and Israel, in other terms at the Anglo-American Empire that is supposed to be the enemy. For what purpose? To de-industrialize them. For whose benefit? Germany’s, of course. First, Germany is the world leader in anything that sounds « clean », like solar energy, wind energy, recycling, greenhouses, reutilization, etc, that sort of things. Any de-industrialization of the West would benefit the German corporations that patented and marketed all those inventions or new processes. Second, the European Union was a trap set by totalitarian dreamers and schemers to submit, conquer and bankrupt country members, for the economic and financial power center of the EU, Germany, to be able to take them over. By bailing them out, Germany takes over the economy, i.e. the wallet of those countries, and that’s the end of their national sovereignty. Look at the map. The territory of the EU is more or less the historical realization of nazi Greater Germany, or the revival or the Roman Empire. Leaders of the EU are non-elected officials and they decide for the fate of the hundreds of millions of Europeans. Often, citizens of its various country members can’t even have a referendum in which they can approve or disapprove a policy. It is imposed on them as a fait accompli. The EU is not a democracy, it is a totalitarian empire disguised as a democracy. If you are curious about what a U.K. politician like Nigel Farage might have to say about the EU, click here. For some information on the links between the history of the Green movement and fascism properly or nazism, provided by anti-fascist researcher Dave Emory click here, by authors Janet Biehl and Peter Staudenmaier, click here or by Peter Staudenmaier alone, Anthroposophy and Ecofascism.

Continuer la lecture

Xavier Rolet on a sales pitch spree in Montreal…Don’t waste your energy, we don’t « buy » it

© Philcold | Dreamstime.com

The excellent National Post published on Thursday June the 16th a follow up to the still ongoing imbroglio surrounding LSE’s bid for TMX, versus the local bid presented by the Maple Group created out of several canadian banks and pension funds. Xavier Rolet, CEO of the LSE, and Thomas Kloet, chief executive of TMX Group Inc, paid a visit to corporate Quebec on last Wednesday in a Marriott Hotel ballroom. They went there basically to try wining over the opinion of Quebec’s financial elite who had nevertheless already presented a counter-offer through the Maple Group for the acquisition of TMX. As Premier Jean Charest does endorse Maple Group’s bid and that the Group includes many financial institutions based in Quebec, the task ahead was difficult.

First, we must all admit that Xavier Rolet does what he has to do: he gives his sales pitch like a professional. He presents arguments, elements of interest, etc, to try to win over a favorable opinion. As an example, he even said that Maple’s bid was based on « worry and fear ». Now, that’s a big statement but it misses the point. Those who back LSE’s bid think there is no problem with it, since Canada is an open market economy. O.K. But again, that’s not the point. TMX-LSE merger has been presented, from the start, as a « merger of equals » . I am not inventing it, these are their own words. But when you end up with only 45% of the shares, compared to 55% for the opposing merging company, that’s not a « merger of equals », it is an acquisition, a take-over in disguise. I am not an economist. I don’t even have an undergraduate degree in mathematics. But I know my numbers. 45 doesn’t equal 55. Period. Whatever way you want to put it, these two numbers will never equal. Are you taking us for fools? Continuer la lecture

Christie Blatchford is back at her Post: Her first task, nailing down anti-prostitution bigots

© Fabrizio Zanier | Dreamstime.com

It is good news for the National Post to have been able to recruit back somebody « behind enemy lines » (for those who don’t know, The Globe and Mail…) Personally, I think she made the right decision, you already know my call on that. She began last tuesday her new but somewhat previous and authentic job on a difficult task: trying to convince the Canadian public that prostitution is not a crime against humanity. Knowing that readers of the National Post may be a little more conservative or conventional possibly than the average one, it was not a small thing. Her article titled « Frank talk from the front lines » about prostitution, of tuesday June 14th, was more in fact a talk from the front lines of journalism itself.

How often do you hear, on the topic of prostitution, the usual following bullshit: prostitutes are all hooked on drugs, they are all beaten by their pimps, they were sexually abused when they were young, they are forced to do it, they don’t have any diploma, they all have STDs, etc? You must hear that on a regular basis. In fact, this is the official rhetoric on prostitution of our phony liberal-trudeauist-relativist ideology that came to prevail in the last decades. With this illusion put forward by the same people who brought confusion in the country using multiculturalism (and that alienated Quebec at the same time) of course, victimization and whining are key elements. It is not conceivable, for these people, that prostitutes could have a normal life, not use drugs, be able to pay their bills, even raise children, etc. They absolutely want to victimize prostitutes, and that says a lot about their psyche… Some of the reader commentaries on her article, published on thursday June 16th, were good illustrations of the incapacity for a large chunk of the public to really understand what prostitution is…because they have never been there. They don’t know what they are talking about.

What is going on between a client and a prostitute is, to begin with, a human relationship. That, the activists of « human rights » and glass knights of « human dignity » and all the other parasites that pollute our democratic life don’t care about. Knowing that they can draw attention by victimizing various groups and whining in their name on whatever issue, they continue to instill this cheap propaganda ad nauseam. I have a proposition for them: why don’t you take the boots, the whip and the lubricant and do it for a while. Then you could talk. I am tired of these bigots who have an opinion on everything but clearly don’t have a clue. There is a saying in the french language: « Ils ont des idées sur tout mais surtout des idées » . Literally translated, it gives « they have opinions on everything but mostly opinions » . That’s what we are dealing with here, anti-prostitution bigots who have an opinion. Blatchford didn’t condemn without knowing. She met with a prostitute in flesh and blood, like a true journalist does, she talked with her, put aside the widely spread propaganda and made her own opinion. That’s honest reporting. I just thought it was important to point that out for you, my followers, and I take the opportunity to welcome her back where she belongs…on this side of the front lines.

Christie Blatchford on Prostitution

Confrontation at Concordia: an Iran-Nazi fifth column in Canada

This film, Confrontation at Concordia, is a great follow up and complement to Discordia, that documentary produced by the National Film Board of Canada about the 2002 riot at Concordia University. This short film shows how the activist, pro-Islamist, leftist and sometimes extreme-leftist milieu in North American universities is in fact an Iran-Nazi fifth column among us that threatens to destroy our society. People who participate in protests against Israel in our universities are often violent, racist, anti-semitic, obnoxious. They encourage mayhem, vandalizing and destroying property and denying freedom of speech to Jews and opponents. I would like here to remind Palestinians and Arab nations a few things, in case you haven’t got history right. First, if we go back in past centuries, the Arab world made no significant development in terms of science, culture, civilization, in roughly 8 centuries, from the 12th to the 20th. It looks as if the Crusades had struck such a blow on the Arab civilization that it virtually stopped there its development. And that’s not Israel’s fault. Second, you lost WWI and as a result, the Ottoman Empire was divided into several countries but no country was formed under the name Palestine. Israel didn’t exist at the time, so it can’t be blamed for it, although a lot of people do. So I wonder on what basis exactly you are blaming the Jews for your predicament and your situation. You should look at yourselves first. Look at what you did wrong to explain your situation. It takes only cowards to blame the Jews for anything. Look into yourselves.

Next, in the second video, Benjamin Netanyahu adresses the students of Canada about the situation in the Near-East, Israel and its relation with Palestinians. The contrast between the « democratic » expressions of the pro-Palestinian activists and the moderation of Netanyahu is staggering. He also sketches the various reasons, historical, ideological, political, cultural, etc, that have led to so much hatred toward the Jews and the State of Israel. Netanyahu is a moderate man, civilized, democratic, liberal. To label him as a war criminal is nonsense. It gives you an idea about the level of brainwashing, mind-control, propaganda and hysteria that exist in the Arab/Muslim worldwide community. Nothing is never their fault; it’s always either Israel’s or America’s. This has got to end. Come on, brave men. I summon you to rise up and fight back against this tyranny of lies and deceptions! Israel is our Fatherland. We have to protect it. If it is destroyed, peace will never come in the Middle East nor anywhere else on Earth. Continuer la lecture

Série de cartes sur les frontières de 1967: pour contrer la propagande occidentale et islamique

© Emirsimsek | Dreamstime.com

Je vous propose une série de cartes et d’informations utiles pour vous aider à contrer la propagande haineuse dirigée contre Israel provenant de l’Islam, ainsi que celle provenant de l’Occident et qui sert à protéger ses intérêts financiers et investissements. En effet, malheureusement, pour ne pas froisser leurs partenaires d’affaires, plusieurs pays occidentaux semblent prêts à mordre dans cette propagande de pacotille sur les lignes de 1967 qui, si elles sont retenues, vont tout simplement ouvrir la porte à l’extermination pure et simple de tous les Israéliens. Car les Islamistes ne vont jamais se satisfaire de simplement obtenir, entre autres, le territoire de la Cisjordanie. Non. Ce qu’ils veulent, c’est exterminer Israel, car Israel, ce sont des Juifs. Le Coran compare les Juifs à des chiens et tous les musulmans sont indoctrinés depuis l’enfance à haïr les Juifs, les tuer et souhaiter leur extermination. Obama, consciemment ou non, se fait l’intermédiaire et le messager de ce désir profond, et de ce fait, vient de perdre toute crédibilité comme intervenant sur la question. Au fond, je commence à me demander si Obama ne serait pas la marionnette de puissances islamiques, liées aux pays producteurs de pétrole, ou encore d’intérêts occidentaux ayant des liens commerciaux étroits avec ces gens. D’une manière ou d’une autre, Obama vient de montrer son vrai visage. On ne peut plus lui faire confiance. Maintenant, Stephan Harper, Premier Ministre du Canada, devient le meilleur allié de Netanyahu dans son projet de protéger Israel, le seul État démocratique du proche et moyen-Orient. Donnons-leur notre appui inconditionnel. Ne manquez pas le commentaire de Rav Dynovitz que j’ai joint. Cela résume bien le ridicule de la position d’Obama.

article-israel-realites-du-terrain-cartes-pour-mieux-comprendre-74374079.html

article-les-lignes-indefendables-de-1967-et-le-protectorat-americain-d-une-souverainete-d-israel-sous-cautio-74265967.html

article-les-frontieres-de-1967-ou-comment-faire-avaler-des-couleuvres-au-monde-entier-74350459.html

article-videos-quelles-sont-les-lignes-de-1967-74351429.html