Voici un dossier préparé par l’équipe de l’excellent site web PointdeBascule sur Tariq Ramadan. Il vous permettra, si vous ne le saviez pas déjà, de mieux connaître l’arrière-fond idéologique de Ramadan et de la pensée islamiste des Frères Musulmans. Avec Ramadan et les Frères Musulmans, on a pas affaire à Maman Canard et ses poussins. Ce sont de dangeureux idéologues qu’il faut combattre de toutes nos forces.
I have only a few questions regarding Rupert Murdoch and his newspaper News of the World. Because, let’s speak frankly here (you know how much I like to do it!) from the outside, that’s exactly what it looks like, an intelligence service. Phone hacking, email hacking, etc, that’s what intelligence agencies do for a living. The real question is whether Murdoch was doing it for an official established governmental agency or if it was his own thing. Unless it was somebody else’s? We must never forget that Prince Alwaleed from Saudi Arabia, who is an Islamist linked to the Muslim Brotherhood, is the second largest shareholder. Was Alwaleed running the operation behind Murdoch’s back? That is a possibility. Anyhow, it seems now that the curtain has fallen on Murdoch or the one(s) running that show. After all, if you spy on people, you have to make sure that you don’t get caught, otherwise you’re going down with the plane (so to speak).
And while it is all very interesting to speculate about these possibilities, something really big happened as the scandal was unfolding. The media, as usual, either slept on the switch or avoided to touch it by fear of retaliation, cowardice, lazyness or anything of that sort. I am talking about the mysterious death of the whistleblower, Sean Hoare, who initiated the scandal that led to Murdoch’s demise that we are seeing today. You don’t need a Ph.D. in criminology or political science to see that he was liquidated. By whom? Hard to say with precision, but members of Murdoch’s empire, of the British government, of the Police, of the Secret Service, in other terms anyone who find themselves today in deep shit because of the reporting of this journalist who only did his job. In a previous post, I praised the work of whistleblowers like Sibel Edmonds, Julia Davis and Steve Kohn who have shown the true nature of whistleblowing. It is sad that Sean Hoare had to die because he reported on misdeeds happening in his own country, but you have to realize that it is not a good period for democracy on Earth. Liberal democracy is under attack and everybody seem to behave as totalitarians, even those who sincerely try to maintain democracy.
Now, I formally ask the question: Where were you, the media, when the news came out that this whistleblower, Sean Hoare, was found dead? Even the excellent National Post didn’t cover it. Heeeeelllllooooo!!! Are everybody on vacation in the media at this time of year in the whole world? Apparently not when it is time to report sensationalist news about Rupert Murdoch’s demise and humiliation anyway. With our sweet media, we have the privilege to get the latest crunchy details on how for example the atmosphere was bad at News of the World, on how Murdoch protected Brooks, etc, all of which are NOT that important if you consider that a man was killed and that an intelligence operation was under way…and that it benefitted evidently somebody. Heeellllllooooo!!!! Somebody in the media doing its job? Do you need an expresso or something to wake you up? There is probably a Starbucks coffee shop around the corner. Why don’t you go there and buy something to stimulate your synapses. Because we, the people, need you, the media, to do your job. How can we assess the state of world affairs if you don’t do what you are supposed to do? Unless you are afraid of losing your own lives? In my case, when I started this blog, I made the decision that I would go to the end to defend my ideas, to the death if necessary. If you have not made the same decision, maybe journalism is not cut out for you. Serving coffee, at Starbucks for example, or in any other brand of your choice, might be something more appropriate.
Ce documentaire essentiel pour une compréhension de l’esclavage complète vraiment bien la série sur l’esclavage arabo-musulman que je vous ai présentée dernièrement. On y apprend, entre autres, que ce ne sont pas seulement les Européens, en général les seuls blamés, qui ont pratiqué l’esclavage des Noirs. Non. Ce sont aussi les peuples arabo-musulmans qui les déportaient vers l’Arabie et autres pays, ainsi que des roitelets et dirigeants Noirs africains qui profitaient financièrement de cette traite humaine. Leur collaboration était nécessaire pour qu’Européens et Arabes puissent pratiquer la déportation aussi facilement. Ce sont donc, aussi, les peuples arabo-musulmans, eux qui aujourd’hui lavent le cerveau des Noirs africains en leur disant que ce sont les Européens chrétiens qui les ont réduits en esclavage, en ne disant mot bien sûr de leur propre participation. Et ce sont aussi des dirigeants africains qui pouvaient ainsi amasser des fortunes et gouverner sur de vastes populations. Que dites-vous de ces quelques « précisions » historiques?
Le Judaïsme est né du refus de l’esclavage. On se souvient de l’Exode des Hébreux au désert vers la terre promise. Or, dans l’Islam, il n’y a rien de tel, au contraire. Le mot « Islam » signifie soumission. C’est l’antithèse du Judaïsme. Les Chrétiens ont abandonné l’esclavage depuis quelques siècles déjà. C’est pourquoi Juifs et Chrétiens doivent s’unir pour mettre fin à la dégénérescence culturelle et civilisationnelle de l’Islam, cette religion à l’agenda réactionnaire et fasciste, qui menace de faire sombrer le monde dans la barbarie. Pour ce qui est des Noirs africains qui se faisaient les entremetteurs entre les populations locales et les esclavagistes étrangers, s’ils n’y avaient pas eu de clients avec lesquels entrer en négoce, ils n’auraient pas pu pratiquer ce commerce avec une telle ampleur. Le documentaire mentionne que l’esclavage était déjà pratiqué en Afrique avant l’arrivée des Européens, par les Africains eux-mêmes, ainsi que par les peuples arabo-musulmans. Apparemment, plusieurs tribus africaines se livraient à des guerres féroces pour le contrôle des territoires et de la main-d’oeuvre, les esclaves. Je crois que ce documentaire est incontournable, ne serait-ce que pour neutraliser la propagande islamique cherchant à présenter le christianisme comme étant à la source de l’esclavage des Noirs.
Guy Millière analyse ici de façon frappante les raisons qui nous ont amenés dans le merdier international dans lequel nous sommes. Barack « Hussein » Obama n’est pas celui que l’on nous a vendu. Il a un passé d’islamiste et de gauchiste pro-palestinien. À Chicago, il est vrai qu’il s’est impliqué dans des groupes communautaires, mais c’étaient des groupes d’obédience islamiste et/ou pro-palestinienne, ça, c’est le bout que l’on ne nous a pas mentionné. Selon le chercheur anti-fasciste Dave Emory, Obama a été délibérément lié avec des islamistes et des activistes pro-palestiniens par des gens comme Karl Rove et Grover Norquist, de façon à lui faire prendre le blâme pour toute une série de problèmes et catastrophes qui allaient subvenir. Emory appelle ces manoeuvres politiques, « badjacketing ». Pour entrer dans les détails de l’analyse, voyez les liens en bas de page. Vers l’âge de 20 ans, Millière se rend en Palestine dans un camp de « réfugiés ». Là-bas, il se rend compte que ces « réfugiés » sont en fait des activistes professionels. Entre autres, on lui présente un exemplaire de Mein Kampf, l’ouvrage d’Adolf Hitler, et il assiste à des « cours » dans lesquels on montre aux enfants comment égorger des Juifs sous le regard approbateur des parents. Ce n’est seulement qu’ensuite qu’il se rend en Israel.
Millière dit les choses telles quelles sont. L’Israel présenté dans les médias de France n’existe pas. Les médias français sont tous des Pravda. Le Monde, entre autres, est le pire. Il compare le « Printemps arabe » à des « jacqueries », faisant référence aux soulèvements de paysans français de 1358. Selon Millière, la civilisation musulmane va s’effondrer dans dix ans au maximum. Étant donné qu’elle n’est pas porteuse d’innovation, qu’elle est stérile, elle va mourir, surtout avec le déclin démographique. L’Europe de son côté est au bord du sinistre et Obama ne fait rien pour aider la situation, au contraire. Obama met en place toute une série de politiques qui déstabilisent le monde. Millière finit en disant que, dans l’histoire, quand les États-Unis se sont montrés forts, la démocratie a avancé ou s’est fortifiée, et quand ils se sont montrés faibles, la démocratie a reculé. C’est ainsi que l’on doit comprendre les événements qui se passent présentement. Le deuxième vidéo nous présente la période de questions qui a suivi la conférence.
Conference GUY MILLIERE Miami Beach 1ere partie par Mael_Chemla
Conference GUY MILLIERE Miami Beach 2ere partie par Mael_Chemla
Fils d’un imam, Fethullah Gulen fait sa première prêche à l’âge de 14 ans en Turquie. Alors qu’il n’a pas terminé ses études primaires, il commence son oeuvre d’islamisation dans les années soixante. En 1998, il immigre aux États-Unis et s’installe dans l’État de Pennsylvanie. Un procès lui est intenté en Turquie in absentia en 2000 pour des propos tenus exprimant le désir de renverser la société séculière de Turquie. Il est acquitté en 2006. Gulen est très proche du Premier Ministre actuel de Turquie, Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Ensemble, ils semblent avoir concocté le projet de faire de la Turquie un état plus proche de l’Islam. Gulen a mis sur pied un réseau de plus de 2000 écoles dont plusieurs se trouvent en Asie centrale, au Pakistan et dans le Caucase, les Madrasas, ainsi qu’aux États-Unis, des « écoles à charte » qu’on dénombre à plus de 119 et liées à de nombreux organismes à but non lucratif, rassemblant de 6 à 8 millions d’étudiants et de gens sous son influence à travers le monde. Au total, son organisation vaudrait au minimum plusieurs milliards de dollars, 20 milliards et plus au moins selon l’ex-agente du FBI, Sibel Edmonds. Afin d’accélérer le virage de la Turquie vers l’Islam, Gulen a planifié l’infiltration de diverses institutions du pays comme l’armée, la police, le gouvernement, etc, en plus de nombreux autres composants de la société civile qu’il contrôle maintenant, comme le syndicat patronal Tuskon, et des entreprises médiatiques, tels que des journaux et des stations de télévision. Gulen soutient les « réformes » qui ont lieu en Turquie depuis quelques années, puisqu’elles permettent d’islamiser doucement, progressivement mais sûrement le pays. Le parti politique du Premier Ministre Erdogan, l’AKP, serait rempli de ses partisans.
This National Post article about a Nebraska rancher opposed to the passing of the Keystone Pipeline XL expansion on his land is revelatory. Randy Thompson, a cattle buyer, is fighting to avoid a foreign company, TransCanada Corp, from bringing its pipeline on his land. I am saying revelatory because similar situations have happened on thousands of different occasions in the past. Everytime a new empire sets foot, or a new civilization takes roots, or an old one dies, we see good and decent people being caught in the implosion, explosion or redefining of the old ways to set the path for the new ones. People like Mr Thompson who have been forced to relocalize or cede a part of their land, by persuasion or by force, have been millions throughout history. Whether we talk about the Roman Empire conquering the world, the French Revolution cutting a few strategic heads, the armies of Muhammad conquering North Africa or the American colonies declaring their independence, in these occurences, there were always people who, even though they hadn’t done anything wrong, were caught in the processes of change to their detriment. That’s the way I see what is happening to Mr Thompson.
The Anglo-American Empire is under attack by the forces of the Third Reich that have gone underground after WWII, and they are more alive than ever. In effect, they have veiled their activities in all kinds of cloaks, such as the Green movement, social activism of all sorts, counter-culture activities, religious cults, religions per se, and sometimes intelligence agencies and other governmental, military and international organizations that they have infiltrated and co-opted to implement and push forward their agenda. Furthermore, the Anglo-American Empire is under attack as well by the most reactionary people that you can find on the surface of this Earth, the Arab/Islamic world that has been, since WWII, contaminated by nazism due to the collaboration of Hasan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, with Adolf Hitler. This world, driven by the morals of Sharia, proposes of bringing the world back to what it was in 7th century A.D. Clearly, we can’t go back to that era, simply because of the most basic rule of human history: to always look forward. These reactionary elements that we find in the Arab world, in Middle Eastern countries such as Saudi Arabia and other states of the Gulf, are basically 7th century Bedouins…with billions of petro-dollars in their pockets…which makes them extremely dangerous. Contrary to westerners, these Bedouins have not worked to get their wealth. They were only lucky enough to be the nomads walking the country when the gasoline engine was invented and that oil became something important. Continuer la lecture
During his second trial on charges of inciting hatred toward Muslims and Moroccans, Geert Wilders made these final remarks on June 1st 2011. It is a pity that anyone should be tried for defending his own society and civilization. It is not him who should be tried, it is those Muslim and Islamist bigots who are subverting our western world with 7th century ethics and codes of conduct. But, because we are governed by traitors and cowards who have sold Europe and the whole world to Islamists to advance their business deals and desires for hegemony, we get that result. In my case, I will not surrender without a fight. I will resist up to the end. I will never submit or convert to Islam. Like Djemila Benhabib says, it is preferable to die on your feet than to live on your knees.
Geert Wilders Final Remarks at The Amsterdam Trial - English Subtitles
Listen to this marvelous video on free speech in Europe, published in 2010. I know that I am a little late but better late than ever. Pat Condell is extremely effective in summing up the situation of freedom of expression in the old continent. First, you have biased judges who act with contempt toward anyone who tries to defend the European culture against deliberate attacks coming from Islamists and pro-Sharia fanatics. Members of Parliament are frequently held to court and treated as if they were high-level criminals, such as in the case of Geert Wilders. Phony trials are organized all over the place to satisfy the bigotry of Islamists and/or of their submissive and coward European-born lap dogs. And for what purpose? To silence dissent. It is the most insidious form of censorship. And evidently, journalists are playing this game as well, buying the propaganda and showing no form of critical thinking.
As Condell points out, the Left is the new Far-Right. A group that greatly exemplifies this is the UAF, United Against Fascism. They are united against fascism, yeah, but they are no democrats either. In fact, they behave like a bunch of thugs, disrupting peaceful protests, often vandalizing property, etc. Europe is infested with activists of this kind, ready to sabotage every single aspects of democracy, in the name of democracy itself, this is the irony of it. Laws are protecting those who wants to destroy Europe. We can see it in the way courts behave, in the way journalists report the news, in the way activist groups are taking position on issues and acting on them. It is almost as if freedom of speech only exists for one side of the board: those who want to destroy Europe. As incredible as it may sound, that’s the reality. There is a diagnosis of the EU presented by Nigel Farage that you don’t wanna miss either, here.
Décidément, il y a des choses qui ne changent pas. Au contraire, on dirait qu’elles changent pour le pire. Voyez ce bel article de Postedeveille.ca reprenant un récent rapport de Statistiques Canada sur les crimes haineux. Ça veut tout dire.
Here are two videos. The first shows Obama during the adress when he uttered the famous « 1967 lines » for the borders of Israel. The second is Obama’s presentation at AIPAC a few days later when he tried to say that he didn’t say what he said… I don’t know about you but I begin to turn sour about Obama. His Cairo speech was dubious but at that time, I wasn’t ready to think that he would put into jeopardy the future of the world. I thought he would favor an evolution of the situation in the Middle East, a resolution of the conflict. But still, it was kind of strike 1. Then happened the uprisings in North Africa. At this occasion, he could have taken the opportunity to warn the world and the American public about terrorist groups or Islamist/reactionary elements that could try to take advantage of these « revolutions » to further their own agenda. Did he do it? No, he endorsed the uprisings, he vouched for them regardless of whoever was involved, whatever their political platforms were, whatever their backgrounds were. Was it enough to throw the towel with Obama? No, that could still turn out good for the world, we would have to wait and see. But still, that was strike 2. And now, with that proposition on the 1967 lines, the terrible fiasco that it produced with Netanyahu during his last visit and the vote that is coming to the UN in september, I think that’s it. Three strikes out! I don’t see how this guy could be re-elected as President for another term. The world is more unstable now since he is in office, much more than when Bush was there… Can you imagine that? But, what is Obama’s agenda anyway? Are you sure that you know what it is? Because, speaking for myself, I don’t know. Is he an Islamist? Possibly. It’s beginning to be dubious and scary. He acts almost as if he would like the Islamists throughout the Middle East to get a firmer grip on their societies, at the detriment of pro-democratic elements and the West as a whole. After you watch these two, don’t forget to watch as well the marvelous presentation that Netanyahu gave to U.S. Congress a few days later. He took the opportunity then to retort as a real head of State can only do. Continuer la lecture