The bourgeoisie and the political DisneyLand sleep pill

Publié le par
Répondre

© Cammeraydave | Dreamstime.com

Something else that gets on my nerves is the bourgeoisie or the middle-class. Don’t get me wrong. I like the middle-class and I think it must continue to exist. The middle-class is essential to the preservation of democratic life. It is a recurring fact that where democracy doesn’t exist or is deficient, just by coincidence these are countries where the middle-class is almost non-existent. My point is that the middle-class lives in a paradise of ideas, theories and concepts that lead it to become estranged from the reality of the political life of its own country or territory. How is that? Simply because in any society, the rich exploit the poor. The rich know that they exploit the poor and the poor know that they are exploited by the rich. But what happens with the middle-class or the bourgeoisie? Well, because they are not the ones exploiting the poor and that they don’t experience directly the exploitation made by the rich, they tend to deny that this exploitation is even happening, they try to downsize it or they express relativist ideas about it.

By personal experience, I know how difficult it is to explain to someone from the middle-class how the world really works. They have all those theories learned at the university or at their workplace about the various aspects of life. They play with a lot of concepts such as: the Right, the Left, social currents, capitalism, communism, Third-World, etc, and obviously, they absolutely have no clue about what these concepts really refer to. Among other sources of phony DisneyLand theories about the world that they express, I have to mention the academic discipline of Sociology. It is incredible the amount of stupidities that it can produce. Sociologists build these gigantic theories about the world and yet it is obvious that they don’t understand the fundamentals. You see, they build their models of the world as if secret societies, intelligence agencies, blackmail, death threats, smear campaigns, double agents of all kinds, infiltrators, etc, wouldn’t exist. It is incredible the naivety of those people.

And the other problem that is revealing itself when we try to alert the minds of bourgeois about the state of the world, is that they have all those nice jobs with social positions and classes that go with them. Are they ready to put that into jeopardy for some « conspiracy theory » proposed by a friend or a family member? I don’t think so. They say to themselves: « If that were to be true, they would have talked about that on CNN or in the Washington Post ». That’s how it works. They’re willing to accept anything that comes from the corporate media without counter-examination or criticism but ready to reject the same that is not reported in the big media. It seems that their whole view of the world is determined by what they are told in the corporate media.

So the bourgeoisie feeds on these theories and gets carried away on a disneylandesque fantasy that brings it to a state of complete hypnotism, unconsciousness and profond sleep. Am I ready to throw the towel on the bourgeoisie? Not yet. But I am getting tired of it. I would like to see more consciousness on its part. That’s probably what Jesus meant when he said that the Kingdom of God belong to the poor. Remember that there was no middle-class in Israel at the time he lived. Even if there was, it probably wouldn’t have understood how the world works anyway, like the middle-class of today.

The « Israel lobby » or how to masquerade anti-semitism

Publié le par
2

© Ivan Mikhaylov | Dreamstime.com

I’m going to talk to you about something that is getting on my nerves pretty much since a couple of months. Yeah, that’s right, the so-called « Israel lobby ». At the forefront of propagandists for this alleged lobby are a whole bunch of right-wingers, Islamists, Arabs, bourgeois and people from the middle-class, leftists, so-called progressives and liberals. In other terms, it covers rather the whole spectrum of the political life. Everybody whines about this, except Jews and Israelis, of course. To begin with, it is obvious that everybody in a democracy is entitled to have his or her own opinion on the subject and express it. I don’t have any problem with that. My problem is that all those awareness-raisers that entertain us so generously on the « Israel lobby » don’t bring anything to substantiate their claims. No names, no dates, no files, no amount of money, no representative’s names, etc, nothing. They don’t propose anything to back up what they say. I am somebody very open and I am ready to listen to anyone. If I have the occasion to learn something new, I will take it. I am ready to give a chance to anyone. But the problem is that these individuals show neither proof nor evidence to back the alleged Israel lobby theory that they postulate. So I am forced to conclude that the whole thing is in fact a fabrication, manufactured to express but hide at the same time anti-semitic sentiments. It is as plain as that. Because if there was such proof of an Israel lobby, don’t you think that Israel’s detractors wouldn’t present it to give credibility to their case? They certainly wouldn’t miss such an opportunity. That’s what leads me to believe that it is a complete fabrication to masquerade anti-semitism.

Ray McGovern’s performance during Clinton’s speech on freedom on the Internet: childishness or more smearing?

Publié le par
Répondre

I hesitated a lot before covering this story, and then suddenly I decided to go ahead with it. I wasn’t sure exactly what to think, I had certain doubts and questions but now I see more clearly. In fact, what I actually thought on first impression has imposed itself as the valid explanation. I also have to mention that the story was covered as well by people I respect in the progressive sector and because they covered it in a way that I feel is not correct, I feel obligated to retort and set the record strait. I became aware of this story through the Boiling Frogs show and the Peter B. Collins show. As you may know, the websites for these two shows are listed on your right in the category Politics and Policy, and I also took the time to write a description of them in the section Resistance that you can read here. So I was more than perplex about the incident and the coverage they made of it.

First of all, let me set the scene to help you understand the context. Hillary Clinton is giving a speech about freedom of speech on the internet and let me precise as well that he video available on Youtube for this incident could be better. The framing, at the beginning of the scene, doesn’t allow us to see the whole room, with McGovern it it. We only see Clinton and we have to make do with it. This room, as the camera frames back, reveals itself to be of a relatively small dimension, and filled with people who are relax and seemingly willing to listen to a speech. And then we witness McGovern being seized by security guards, and after a few seconds we can hear him shout « So this is America? », and the video ends. I wish we could have a better document on which to base our analysis but all we can do is rely on this one. Continuer la lecture →

Yes, Israel, that’s it! Fight back against Islamists and show no mercy!

Publié le par
1

© Penny Mathews | Dreamstime.com

Congratulations, Israel, that’s the spirit of the Resistance! Fight back! Stand up and don’t let yourself be intimidated by a fifth column living inside your borders! That’s the spirit! Make sure that the Hamas pay a heavy price for every drop of Israeli blood that they would take! Let the blood of Jews be the most difficult thing to get on this planet! And mostly show no mercy, because if they ever have a chance, whether it is the Hamas, the Hezbollah or the Muslim Brotherhood, they wouldn’t pass over the opportunity to destroy you and kill all your citizens to the last one. Keep on fighting! As a Christian, I give you my blessing. Do what it takes to defend Israel and make it prevail!

The problem is Islam – by Wafa Sultan, or how Muhammad created a political system that will destroy the whole world

Publié le par
Répondre

So, what were we telling you since a couple of years? That it is Islam the problem, not the Arabs per se, not radical Islam, not political Islam, not wahhabism nor anything else. Now these statements, which were qualified as islamophobic, are corroborated by a Muslim woman from Syria. Yes, Islam is the problem. Muhammad, this great individual, was an unliterate. He was a killer and probably a psychopath. He married his second wife when she was 6 years old… Yes, you got me right. He was a pedophile, to express it in western terms. Listen to Wafa Sultan, a Syrian woman, explain how she got tired of Islam and its lies. She calls you to stand up and fight back against this « religion of love and peace » because it might be the greatest threat that the world has ever faced. Islam has a power of corruption never seen before in our world, and unfortunately our leaders seem to be complicit in allowing all these Muslims, who are in fact infiltraters, to come over to America and Europe to pervert and force the local populations into submission. Thank you New World Order, you have screwed us all.

Le Québec est-il une société libre

Publié le par
1

© Georgios Kollidas | Dreamstime.com

Les « écoles libres » sont illégales au Québec… Tiens-donc… Selon Marike Reid-Gaudet, qui est détentrice d’une maîtrise en sociologie de l’éducation et que vous pouvez voir et entendre dans cet extrait vidéo du site web La Déséducation, le Ministère de l’éducation du Québec interdirait les écoles libres parce que, supposément, elles ouvriraient la porte aux dérives religieuses… Pourtant, cela n’empêche pas le même Ministère de donner une subvention à l’École Dar al-Iman de Montréal (voir ici, ici et ici) pour qu’elle puisse endoctriner les enfants dans l’islamo-fascisme de la doctrine des Frères musulmans! Franchement, le gouvernement du Québec est dur à suivre. Selon Marike Reid-Gaudet, il y a des écoles libres un peu partout dans le monde mais pas au Québec. Notre gouvernement les interdit pour éviter l’endoctrinement religieux…et il donne une subvention à une école islamiste pour faire exactement cela!

Plus loin dans le vidéo, on peut voir une adolescente en compagnie de sa mère nous raconter son expérience de l’école libre. Franchement, elle a l’air beaucoup mieux dans sa peau que beaucoup d’ados que je croise dans la rue et dans le métro tous les jours. C’est quoi cette maudite manie que l’on a au Québec de vouloir tout contrôler? Le mot nazi est le raccourci pour national-socialisme. Dans notre belle province, le socialisme est triomphant depuis les années soixante et il s’est accompagné d’une montée du nationalisme… En d’autres termes, les risques de dérives fascistiques sont très grandes partout où le socialisme règne en maître, en raison justement des liens étroits qui l’unissent au nationalisme. En passant, est-ce que l’Union soviétique fut un bel exemple de liberté d’expression? Non. Le socialisme mène à la même bêtise totalitaire que le fascisme. Seule la tonalité est différente.

Et d’après vous, est-ce que les syndicats québécois accepteraient volontiers de voir apparaître des écoles libres? Sûrement pas. Après tout, les syndicats sont des mafias légales, organisées en fait pour exploiter les travailleurs qu’elles sont supposées protéger et défendre, en leur arrachant de force des cotisations de toutes sortes, dont les fameuses cotisations pour l’assurance-maladie qu’ils administrent eux-mêmes parfois… Combien s’en mettent-ils dans les poches en bout de ligne avec cette combine, je ne sais pas. Mais il demeure que notre peuple doit lutter contre toute une série d’exploiteurs en tout genre et c’est pour ça que l’école est si mauvaise. Comme tout le monde en a rien à foutre du développement des enfants, comme tous ne pensent qu’à piger dans le pot de biscuits à nos dépens, notre peuple ne cesse de régresser. Nos écoles vont rester des prisons pour longtemps, tant que ce socialisme de toilettes publiques ne passera pas à la guillotine de la sagesse de la tradition.

Quelques rappels importants sur Israel et la Palestine et la réalité des « réfugiés » Palestiniens

Publié le par
Répondre

© Emirsimsek | Dreamstime.com

Jean-Marie Gélinas, Président du mouvement Amitiés Québec-Israel, nous les présente ici.

1.. ISRAËL est devenue une nation en 1312 avant J.C, soit 2000 ans avant même la naissance de l’Islam

2.. Jamais aucune entité géographique et politique indépendante, aucun pays, ne s’est intitulée « PALESTINE » au cours de l’histoire. Par extension aucun peuple ne s’est jamais appelé « PALESTINIEN ».

3.. Les arabes de la « région » du Moyen Orient dénommée « PALESTINE » n’ont commence a s’identifier comme faisant partie d’un peuple « PALESTINIEN » que dans la 2eme moitie du 20eme siècle.

4.. Depuis la conquête juive de 1272 avant J.C, les juifs ont établi leur nation sur cette terre et la nation juive y a prospère pendant 1000 ans, avec JERUSALEM comme capitale.

5.. La présence juive sur la terre d’ISRAËL a été constante et ininterrompue pendant 3300 ans.

6.. JERUSALEM n’a jamais été la capitale d’aucun état arabe ou musulman.

7.. Même lorsque les Jordaniens occupaient JERUSALEM, ils n’ont jamais envisagé d’en faire leur capitale.

8.. Durant la souveraineté Jordanienne sur JERUSALEM (19 ans), jamais un homme d’état arabe ne l’a visitée.

9.. JERUSALEM est mentionnée plus de 700 fois dans le TANA’H, le livre saint du judaïsme.

10.. JERUSALEM n’est pas mentionnée une seule fois dans le Coran.

11.. JERUSALEM fut fondée par le ROI DAVID

12.. Jamais MAHOMET n’a visité JERUSALEM.

13.. Les juifs du monde entier prient en se tournant vers JERUSALEM.

14.. Les musulmans pour prier tournent le dos à JERUSALEM.

 

LES REFUGIES JUIFS ET ARABES:

 

15.. Pendant la guerre Israélo-Arabe de 1948, les arabes ont été encouragés à fuir ISRAËL par les leaders arabes et en particulier le grand Mufti de JERUSALEM, allié d’ Hitler et son hôte a Berlin pendant la guerre 39-45

16.. Les appels radio du Mufti annonçaient clairement le massacre de tous les juifs se trouvant en ISRAËL lors de l’invasion imminente par les armées arabes, ainsi que celui des Arabes qui auraient refusé de fuir et seraient considérés comme « collaborateurs ».

17.. Il est honnête de rappeler que certains arabes, qui en ont eu connaissance, ont également fui suite au massacre de 300 personnes dans le village de DEIR YASSIN perpétré en représailles par le groupe STERN suite à l’assassinat de plusieurs des leurs par des éléments du village. Continuer la lecture →

Alberta and Quebec: the birth of the new Canada

Publié le par
1

First, let me congratulate you, Neil, for having written this piece. By the way, the alchemical reference in the title is terrific. I think you begin to get the picture. Canada, historically, used to be a bipolar entity run by Ottawa, where resides federal power, and by Quebec with its « société distincte » based on language and culture.  So Ontario and Quebec used to be the two provinces where decisions were made or where trends were manufactured or developed. Now, in the 21st century, things are changing. With a planet of roughly 7 billion inhabitants, energy is a key element in the composition of a state.

In that regard, it is only logical that Alberta emerges now as the new center for English-Canada. Oil being increasingly determinant in shaping countries’s foreign policy, the province imposes itself as the new voice for stating the political agenda in the country. And Quebec, being already a giant in the production of electricity, may keep its position as a leader of influence, and even more if you consider that the province decided to add the oil-and-gas-industry to its portfolio and to undertake the exploitation of the Old Harry pit and of shale gas deposits in the St-Lawrence valley. If Ontario and Quebec used to be the two main voices in Canada until today, now it is Alberta and Quebec. Why Ontario isn’t anymore a leader in Canada, would you ask? Maybe because Ontario is synonymous with the past, when Canada was considered to be not much more than just a colony where companies could pillage natural resources and exploit the population for its workforce capabilities. In those years, much emphasis was being put on Canada’s inclusion in the Commonwealth and its disguised submission to the british royal family. In other terms, that vision of the country, which was fabricated for the 19th century when the country itself was born, is now outdated.

Like everything else, the political life evolves and countries with it. That is why the arrival of the Conservative Party is something interesting. Overall, they have a vision of the country, of foreign policy, of geo-politics that is much more mature than the one of the other parties. And the Bloc Québécois, after 20 years, begins to show cracks in the wall as many Quebeckers ask themselves about the pertinence to keep a sovereignist party in Ottawa that can’t do the sovereignty anyway and leaves us in the opposition forever. I always voted for the Bloc since its inception. But this coming election, I will vote for the Conservatives. They have a lot of policies with which I disagree…but they support Israel. You see, Israel is the barometer of a country’s foreign policy. You wanna know where a country lies on the geo-political scale? Check its policy toward Israel. It tells all. The fact that the Conservatives support Israel means that they would increase the pressure on Islamists, use tribunals to expulse them out of the country, take measures to protect our culture, our civilization and our values, etc. But, most importantly, it means that they get the picture of the geo-political theater and have a good take on the actors that are playing in it.

The Bloc Québécois was born when MPs from Quebec split away from their parties after the Meech Lake debacle. To use an image, it is almost as if the Progressive faction of the Progressive Conservative Party would have split. It probably has, since the Party slowly disintegrated afterwards. When it was brought back to life through a merger with the Canadian Alliance Party, the Progressive element had disappeared, only the Conservative element remained. You know what? I just had a crazy idea… What if the Conservative Party and the Bloc Québécois create a coalition to allow ourselves to have a majority in the Parliament? Wouldn’t it resemble Alberta and Quebec united? Wouldn’t it resemble a new Progressive Conservative Party? Michel Kelly-Gagnon is right with his analysis. It is time that we move on. And you are right, Neil. The fleur-de-lys and the rose could and can unite. It is probably one of the greatest realization of alchemy if we can achieve it. Let’s keep our eyes on the goal.

article1977524

Bank shareholders refuse to bite into the apples of social-feminism

Publié le par
Répondre

© I3alda | Dreamstime.com

That’s the spirit of the Resistance, folks! Anytime there are signs of a totalitarian ideology showing its face, we must react and fast. Because when we allow these stupid quotas to be considered in the management of our institutions and companies, we open the door for mediocrity. Institutions, businesses, companies, governments must have the best people in charge, period. Whether they are white, black, blue, handicaped, female, male, young, old, native, immigrant, native, extraterrestrial or from this very Earth, is not relevant. A nation builds its strength and power by giving opportunities to those who can make a difference. To hire somebody based on something else than his or her competence is stupid and unacceptable. Congratulations, shareholders! You stood up against socialism and feminism!

article1972265