Conférence de presse de Maxime Bernier sur son départ du Parti Conservateur du Canada

Cette semaine, le député fédéral de la circonscription de Beauce, Maxime Bernier, a claqué la porte du Parti Conservateur du Canada. Il a aussi du même souffle annoncé son intention de fonder son propre parti politique. En effet, il est grand temps pour les patriotes et nationalistes de prendre l’initiative du débat politique au lieu d’être toujours à la remorque des baratineurs impénitents qui peuplent les partis politique de gauche. Le Parti Conservateur du Canada est, lui aussi, malgré ses prétentions, un parti de gauche. C’est un Parti Libéral avec un bannière bleue, tout simplement. Ils veulent les mêmes choses, votent les mêmes lois, font les mêmes actions et prononcent les mêmes discours. Et lorsque Maxime Bernier parle de «corruption morale», il a absolument raison. Le député de Beauce a très bien compris ce qui se passe au Parti Conservateur du Canada. Bien. Maintenant, Monsieur Bernier doit prendre cela et l’amener vers l’action politique. Il ne doit perdre aucune seconde et fonder son parti dès maintenant pour présenter une équipe complète de candidats pour les élections de 2019.

Évidemment, cela ne sera pas facile. Maxime Bernier aura affaire à la même opposition que celle à laquelle Donald Trump a dû faire face. Des deux côtés de la frontière, ce sont les mêmes élites qui s’accaparent les mêmes richesses, défendent les mêmes intérêts, concoctent les mêmes politiques et nous mènent à la ruine. La propagande contre Maxime Bernier est déjà commencée, on l’a vu dans les commentaires qui ont suivi sa conférence de presse. Aussi, j’ai noté que la vidéo de sa conférence est difficile à trouver en français, sur Youtube et même sur Google, alors qu’on la trouve facilement en version anglaise. Cela semble un cas de censure évident, ce qui démontre que Monsieur Bernier devra avoir la couenne dure s’il désire persister dans cette aventure.

Du côté des patriotes québécois et canadiens, c’est une excellente nouvelle. Cela veut dire que, maintenant, nous avons avoir une figure politique que nous pourrons appuyer et soutenir, quelqu’un qui défendra nos intérêts. De façon réaliste, je m’attends pas à ce que Maxime Bernier prenne nécessairement le pouvoir dès 2019, ce serait beaucoup demander. En revanche, son nouveau parti pourrait constituer une force d’opposition aux Libéraux, aux NPD et aux Conservateurs intéressante pour la suite des choses. Il est évident que beaucoup de canadiens, dans toutes les provinces, seront intéressés à soutenir un parti qui est réllement un parti patriote et nationaliste, au lieu de perdre leur temps avec les Conservateurs ou les Bloquistes. Je dois vous avouer en terminant que j’avais l’impression que la paysage politique canadien était complètement bouché et qu’il n’y avait rien à faire. Par cette conférence de presse, Maxime Bernier vient de fracasser le moule rigide qui existait depuis quelques décennies et cela ouvre des possibilités intéressantes pour les patriotes. Enfin, la lumière apparaît au bout du tunnel. L’avenir s’ouvre devant nous. Vous trouverez plus bas le lien pour visionner la vidéo de sa conférence de presse en français, ainsi que la vidéo de la version anglaise de la même conférence et celle de la période de questions qui a suivie. On peut se réjouir ici car ce sont de très bonnes nouvelles pour les patriotes de partout au pays.

Conférence de presse de Maxime Bernier

Justin Trudeau fait preuve d’intolérance contre une citoyenne…au nom de la tolérance

Justin Trudeau est entré en colère contre une citoyenne tout simplement parce qu’elle a posé une question sur l’immigration. Lors l’on entend cela, on se prend à rêver à Maxime Bernier comme Premier Ministre du Canada. Maxime Bernier a un discours beaucoup mieux adapté aux réalités de l’immigration. Bien sûr, pour que cela puisse se produire, Monsieur Bernier devra trouver une façon de déloger Andrew Scheer comme chef du Parti Conservateur et cela ne sera pas facile. En attendant, on doit s’habituer à ce genre de comportement de la part de notre Premier Ministre actuel.

Analysis of Dinesh D’Souza’s film Death of a Nation on Red Ice TV

In this episode of Week-End Warrior, Lana and Henrik of Red Ice TV discuss the latest film form Dinesh D’Souza, Death of a Nation. To make things brief, D’Souza tries to sell us the idea that the Democrats were the real Nazis and fascists and that the Democrat Party was the party of slavery, etc. Although this thesis has certain merits, I agree with Lana and Henrik that Dinesh D’Souza twists reality in order to propagandize against the Democrat Party and that is wrong. There were partisans of slavery and of nazism in both parties. But I want to cover another aspect of D’Souza’s view of things that they don’t talk about (not directly). It is the question of White supremacy. Dinesh D’Souza covered the subject of White supremacy in an interview given to Frank Gaffney on the air of Secure Freedom Radio (the audio files are below). During the interview, he explains to Gaffney that fascism and Nazism were left-wing ideologies and that is an argument that can be made if we look at their doctrine. He says that the Left put the blame on the Right for the crimes of Nazism and fascism and that is true. Right-wingers don’t commit mass murder and try to reduce the rights of the citizens. But he fails to see that, in that regard, the so-called White supremacy is a concept that was invented by the same Left to try to portray patriots in a bad light. During the interview, he makes references to figures of the Alt-Right like Jason Kessler and Richard Spencer and says that they are wrong, etc, etc. People in the patriotic and/or nationalist movement are not ‘White supremacists’. They are activists or advocates for the white race. That means that they want the best conditions for the white race, to thrive, to be prosperous, to grow, etc, and there is nothing ‘supremacist’ about that. And that is done not at the expense of others. Every race and ethnic group has the right to be free and live in an environment favorable to its development. Dinesh D’Souza falls into the trap of calling ‘supremacist’ good men and women who simply want to protect us from harm and avoid the catastrophe of totalitarianism. Dinesh D’Souza is trying to have it both ways. He wants the public to believe that those who call right-wingers ‘fascists’ and ‘nazis’ are wrong when they do that, but on the other hand, that they are right when they call certain right-wingers ‘white supremacists’. According to Dinesh D’Souza those so-called ‘White supremacists’ are not really right-wingers. The truth is that they are really right-wingers but they are not White supremacists. They are trying to protect us.

To visit the page of the show on SFR: Interview with Dinesh D’Souza on Death of a Nation

Interview with Russian dissident Vladimir Bukovsky on SFR

In a recent article, I blogged about the unfortunate imprisonment of British patriot Tommy Robinson. In Russia, one of the most famous and courageous person who had decided to confront the local totalitarian forces there is Vladimir Bukovsky. He passed many years in prison and faced many hardships. Among others, you can read one of his books,To Build a Castle: My Life as a Dissenter. In this interview on the air of Secure Freedom Radio, he explains to Frank Gaffney that everything that is happening in the West right now was foreseeable. Because once you allow the germs of totalitarianism to take roots, it is only a question of time before the whole society is overturned.

The ‘room 101’ treatment of Tommy Robinson…

It is a very dark day for Great Britain. Tommy Robinson has just been released from prison, and that’s good news. The bad news is, as anyone can see in this interview given to Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, that Robinson has apparently suffered from some kind of psychological damage or trauma as a consequence of his imprisonment. Will that damage be permanent? Nobody knows but the British government bears responsibility. During the interview, Robinson recalls that he was placed in solitary confinement in a prison with a large representation of Muslims and that those Muslims used to throw feces through his open window, among other things. He was arrested on very disputable grounds, his rights were not respected, due process was not followed, etc. The whole thing seemed like a kangaroo court-type of procedure. The look of horror on Tucker Carlson’s face while Robinson tells his story is worth the trip because it says it all. What country on Earth, supposedly a democratic one, would treat one of its citizens like that, especially a patriot who, beside a few minor things, does nothing wrong and is beyond reproach? Great Britain apparently.

But why, would you ask yourself. Let me provide my own explanation. Robinson was arrested simply because he was protesting in front of a court building where a specific case that interested him was held. Authorities used the pretext that he was already in the vicinity of a court building to bring him in, if you know what I mean, before a judge. Again why? Probably because they wanted to punish him for doing the unthinkable: speaking his mind, courageously, in public. In effect, he was the one who read the famous speech at Speaker’s Corner that Martin Sellner, in the company of Brittany Pettibone and Lauren Southern, was supposed to give there. You see, it has been a long time since Great Britain is no longer a democracy. Remember that both George Orwell’ 1984 and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World see their action taking place in Great Britain. It is not an accident. Also, the famous cult TV series The Prisoner, starring Patrick McGoohan, was a british production. These three artistic productions were trying to portray reality as it is, not the fantasy world that the media would like us to believe. And by the way, Canada is a former british colony (they took over from the French in 1760) and curiously, I have seen before these kind of tactics. I can recognize the modus operandi. They are used regularly here against individuals with a strong mind a strong personality, so I am not surprised. Business as usual in the British Empire.

However here, contrary to the life of relative comfort and abundance that Patrick McGoohan’s character enjoyed in The Prisoner, Tommy Robinson was given a treatment reminiscent more of the ‘room 101′ treatment in George Orwell’ 1984. In that novel, room 101 was the room where the prisoners were interrogated and tortured to break their will and their mind. And I think this whole episode with Tommy Robinson has to be considered like that. The powers that be in Great Britain are trying to break him psychologically, and to a certain degree, they seem to have succeeded at least partially and temporarily, judging by the non-verbal signals and language given in this interview. We have to denounce that vigorously because if we don’t, tomorrow, it could be anyone of us going down the same road. Yes, it is a dark for Great Britain. The least the government could do would be to apologize to him and drop charges. Will they do it? Don’t hold your breath…

Robert Spencer on Jihad: The greatest threat to western civilization…

Robert Spencer on Secure Freedom Radio with Frank Gaffney. To listen to the show on the original Secure Freedom Radio page, please visit: The Greatest Threat to Western Civilization.